Regulation 26 Practitioner subject to inquiry in a fraud case
A Health Board or primary care NHS trust that receives notice pursuant to regulation 9(3) may not add the practitioner subject to the inquiry to any list until proceedings in that case are finally concluded.
In relation to a practitioner subject to an inquiry in a fraud case, the provisions of–
section 20 (applications to provide general medical services) of the 1978 Act are modified to the extent that such a practitioner shall not be entitled to the inclusion of the practitioner’s name in a medical list;
section 25(2)(b) of the 1978 Act are modified to the extent that regulations need not confer a right for such a practitioner who wishes to be included in a list of dental practitioners who undertake to provide general dental services to be so included;
section 26(2)(b) of the 1978 Act are modified to the extent that regulations need not confer a right for such a practitioner who wishes to be included in the appropriate list to be so included; and
section 27 of the 1978 Act are modified to the extent that nothing in section 27(3) and (5) shall require regulations to provide for a Health Board or primary care NHS trust to include such a practitioner in a list or to confer on such a practitioner rights of appeal against a Health Board or primary care NHS trust from a refusal to add such a practitioner to a list,
until proceedings in that case are finally concluded.