Regulation 54 Procedure at special case hearing
Subject to these Regulations, the person conducting or chairing the special case hearing shall determine the procedure.
The special case hearing shall not proceed unless the officer concerned has been notified of the effect of regulation 7(1) to (3) in relation to a special case hearing.
Subject to paragraph (4), the person conducting or chairing the special case hearing may from time to time adjourn the hearing if it appears to him to be necessary or expedient to do so.
The special case hearing shall not, except in exceptional circumstances, be adjourned solely to allow the complainant or any interested person to attend.
No witnesses other than the officer concerned shall give evidence at the special case hearing.
The person representing the officer concerned may—
address the hearing in order to do any or all of the following—
put the case of the officer concerned;
sum up that case;
respond on behalf of the officer concerned to any view expressed at the proceedings; and
make representations concerning any aspect of proceedings under these Regulations; and
if the officer concerned is present at the proceedings or is participating in them by video link or other means in accordance with regulation 50(2), confer with the officer concerned.
Where the person representing the officer concerned is a relevant lawyer, the police friend of the officer concerned may also confer with the officer concerned in the circumstances mentioned at paragraph (6)(b).
The police friend or relevant lawyer of the officer concerned may not answer any questions asked of the officer concerned during the special case hearing.
The person conducting or chairing the special case hearing may allow any document to be considered at the hearing notwithstanding that a copy of it has not been supplied—
by the officer concerned to the appropriate authority in accordance with regulation 45(2); or
to the officer concerned in accordance with regulation 43(1).
Where evidence is given or considered at the special case hearing that the officer concerned—
on being questioned by an investigator, at any time after he was given written notice under regulation 15(1) of these Regulations or regulation 14A of the Complaints Regulations; or
in submitting any information or by not submitting any information at all under regulation 45 (or, where paragraph (12) applies, paragraph 19C of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act or regulation 16(1) or 22(2) or (3)),
failed to mention any fact relied on in his case at the special case hearing, being a fact which in the circumstances existing at the time, the officer concerned could reasonably have been expected to mention when so questioned or when providing such information, paragraph (11) applies.
Where this paragraph applies, the person or persons conducting the special case hearing may draw such inferences from the failure as appear proper.
This paragraph applies where the case was certified as a special case following a determination made under regulation 41(3).
The person or persons conducting the special case hearing shall review the facts of the case and decide whether or not the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to gross misconduct.
The person or persons conducting the special case hearing shall not find that the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to gross misconduct unless—
he is or they are satisfied on the balance of probabilities that this is the case; or
the officer concerned admits it is the case.
At a special case hearing conducted by a panel, any decision shall be based on a majority (with the chair having the casting vote if necessary), but shall not indicate whether it was taken unanimously or by a majority.