OpenLegislation

Schedule TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT ACT 2004 NETWORK MANAGEMENT DUTIES GUIDANCE ON INTERVENTION CRITERIA FOR WALES

Changes not yet applied. Later legislation changes this provision in ways not yet written into the text below:

  1. 1INTRODUCTION
  2. 2INTRODUCTION
  3. 3INTRODUCTION
  4. 4INTRODUCTION
  5. 5INTRODUCTION
  6. 6INTRODUCTION
  7. 7INTRODUCTION
  8. 8INTRODUCTION
  9. 9INTRODUCTION
  10. 10THE CONTEXT
  11. 11THE CONTEXT
  12. 12THE CONTEXT
  13. 13FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
  14. 14FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
  15. 15FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
  16. 16FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
  17. 17FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
  18. 18THE NETWORK MANAGEMENT DUTIES
  19. 19PROCESSES AND OUTCOMES
  20. 20PROCESSES AND OUTCOMES
  21. 21PROCESSES AND OUTCOMES
  22. 22PROCESSES AND OUTCOMES
  23. 23PROCESSES AND OUTCOMES
  24. 24PROCESSES AND OUTCOMES
  25. 25DEMONSTRATING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE NETWORK MANAGEMENT DUTIES
  26. 26DEMONSTRATING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE NETWORK MANAGEMENT DUTIES
  27. 27DEMONSTRATING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE NETWORK MANAGEMENT DUTIES
  28. 28DEMONSTRATING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE NETWORK MANAGEMENT DUTIES
  29. 29DEMONSTRATING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE NETWORK MANAGEMENT DUTIES
  30. 30ASSESSMENT OF EVIDENCE
  31. 31TO WHAT EXTENT HAS AN AUTHORITY HAD REGARD FOR THE NETWORK MANAGEMENT DUTY GUIDANCE IN PERFORMING ITS NETWORK MANAGEMENT DUTIES? (See section 18(2) of the Act)
  32. 32Considering the needs of all road users. (See NMDG paragraphs 26, 51, 76-79 and 117)
  33. 33Coordinating and planning works and known events. (See NMDG paragraph 27)
  34. 34Gathering and providing information needs. (See NMDG paragraphs 28, 89, 90, 126 and 127)
  35. 35Incident management and contingency planning. (See NMDG paragraphs 29 and 50)
  36. 36Dealing with traffic growth. (See NMDG paragraph 30)
  37. 37Working with all stakeholders — internal and external. (See the Act and NMDG paragraphs 31 to 33 and 57 to 62)
  38. 38Ensuring parity with others. (See NMDG paragraphs 67 and 88)
  39. 39Providing evidence to demonstrate network management. (See NMDG paragraph 47)
  40. 40TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE LOCAL TRAFFIC AUTHORITY CONSIDERED AND WHERE APPROPRIATE TAKEN ACTION AS ENVISAGED BY SECTION 16(2) OF THE ACT?
  41. 41TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE LOCAL TRAFFIC AUTHORITY EXERCISED ANY POWER IN SUPPORT OF THIS ACTION?
  42. 42TO WHAT EXTENT HAVE INDICATORS AND TARGETS TO REDUCE CONGESTION BEEN USED?
  43. 43TO WHAT EXTENT DO INDIVIDUAL CIRCUMSTANCES ACCOUNT FOR AN APPARENT FAILURE OF A DUTY?
  44. 44REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
  45. 45REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
  46. 46REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
  47. 47CRITERIA FOR DECIDING WHETHER TO GIVE AN INTERVENTION NOTICE
  48. 48CRITERION No.1 (Section 17 duties)
  49. 49CRITERION No.1 (Section 17 duties)
  50. 50CRITERION No.2 (Section 16 — the network management duty)
  51. 51CRITERION No.2 (Section 16 — the network management duty)
  52. 52CRITERIA FOR DECIDING WHETHER TO MAKE AN INTERVENTION ORDER
  53. 53CRITERION No.1 (Section 17 duties)
  54. 54CRITERION No.1 (Section 17 duties)
  55. 55CRITERION No.2 (Section 16 — the network management duty)
  56. 56CRITERION No.2 (Section 16 — the network management duty)