OpenLegislation

Regulation 24 Contamination from pipes

Changes not yet applied. Later legislation changes this provision in ways not yet written into the text below:

(1)

Where there is a risk (“the prescribed risk”) that water supplied by a water authority would, for the reason mentioned in paragraph (2) below, cease to comply with the requirements of Part II of these Regulations after leaving the authority’s pipes, a water authority shall, subject to paragraphs (4) and (5)—

(a)

treat the water in such a way as will, in its opinion, eliminate the prescribed risk or reduce it to a minimum; and

(b)

where the risk relates to lead, remove its part of any pipe to which this sub-paragraph applies when such part of the remainder of that pipe as connects directly to a tap used for the supply of drinking water is removed.

(2)

The reason referred to in paragraph (1) is the presence in the water of a concentration of copper, lead or zinc which exceeds the prescribed concentration and which is attributable to the fact that—

(a)

copper or lead is the major component; or

(b)

zinc is a component,

of such a pipe as is mentioned in section 76A(3)(a) of the Act.

(3)

Paragraph (1)(b) applies to a lead pipe which is subject to water pressure from a main or would be so subject but for the closing of some valve and which belongs, as to part, to a water authority and, as to the remainder, to the owner of any premises to which the water authority supplies water for domestic purposes.

(4)

Paragraph (1) shall not require a water authority to treat water —

(a)

if the treatment is unlikely, in its opinion, to achieve a significant reduction in the concentration of copper, lead or zinc, as the case may be; or

(b)

in any water supply zone where the prescribed risk relates only to water supplied in an insignificant part of the zone; or

(c)

if treatment is not reasonably practicable.

(5)

Paragraph (1) shall not require a water authority to remove a pipe unless it has received a request in writing to do so from the owner of the premises in question.