Rule 26 Supplementary provisions concerning reviews
In proceedings for a review under section 120 or 179 of the 2002 Act F1or section 103 of the 2024 Act, rules 9 to 16 are to be construed and applied as if —
references to “appeal” were references to “application”;
references to “the notice of appeal” were references to “the notice of application”;
references to the “appellant” were references to the “applicant”;
references to the “grounds of appeal” were references to the “grounds of review”; and
the words “or expert witnesses” in rule 9(6)(b) were omitted.
In proceedings for a review under section 120 of the 2002 Act, rule 15(1) applies with the substitution of “ four weeks ” for “six weeks”.
The Tribunal's power to strike out an appeal under rule 11 F2, in proceedings for review under section 120 or 179 of the 2002 Act, includes a power to strike out an application for review if it considers that the applicant is not a person aggrieved by the decision in respect of which the review is sought.
Annotations
Textual amendments
- F1
-
Words in rule 26(1) inserted (1.1.2025) by The Competition Appeal Tribunal (Amendment) Rules 2024 (S.I. 2024/1233), rule 1(1), Sch. para. 5(a)
- F2
-
Words in rule 26(3) inserted (1.1.2025) by The Competition Appeal Tribunal (Amendment) Rules 2024 (S.I. 2024/1233), rule 1(1), Sch. para. 5(b)
Notes on Part 3
Textual amendments
- F1
-
Words in Pt. 3 heading inserted (1.10.2025) by The Competition Appeal Tribunal (Amendment) Rules 2025 (S.I. 2025/999), rules 1(2), 5
- F2
-
Words in Pt. 3 heading substituted (1.1.2025) by The Competition Appeal Tribunal (Amendment) Rules 2024 (S.I. 2024/1233), rule 1(1), Sch. para. 3