OpenLegislation

Rule 26 Supplementary provisions concerning reviews

(1)

In proceedings for a review under section 120 or 179 of the 2002 Act F1or section 103 of the 2024 Act, rules 9 to 16 are to be construed and applied as if —

(a)

references to “appeal” were references to “application”;

(b)

references to “the notice of appeal” were references to “the notice of application”;

(c)

references to the “appellant” were references to the “applicant”;

(d)

references to the “grounds of appeal” were references to the “grounds of review”; and

(e)

the words “or expert witnesses” in rule 9(6)(b) were omitted.

(2)

In proceedings for a review under section 120 of the 2002 Act, rule 15(1) applies with the substitution of “ four weeks ” for “six weeks”.

(3)

The Tribunal's power to strike out an appeal under rule 11 F2, in proceedings for review under section 120 or 179 of the 2002 Act, includes a power to strike out an application for review if it considers that the applicant is not a person aggrieved by the decision in respect of which the review is sought.

Annotations

Textual amendments

F1

Words in rule 26(1) inserted (1.1.2025) by The Competition Appeal Tribunal (Amendment) Rules 2024 (S.I. 2024/1233), rule 1(1), Sch. para. 5(a)

F2

Words in rule 26(3) inserted (1.1.2025) by The Competition Appeal Tribunal (Amendment) Rules 2024 (S.I. 2024/1233), rule 1(1), Sch. para. 5(b)

Notes on Part 3

Textual amendments

F1

Words in Pt. 3 heading inserted (1.10.2025) by The Competition Appeal Tribunal (Amendment) Rules 2025 (S.I. 2025/999), rules 1(2), 5

F2

Words in Pt. 3 heading substituted (1.1.2025) by The Competition Appeal Tribunal (Amendment) Rules 2024 (S.I. 2024/1233), rule 1(1), Sch. para. 3