Section 97 Excluded cases
United Kingdom
A payment or other benefit is not a reverse premium so far as it is brought into account under section 532 of CAA 2001 (the general rule excluding contributions) to reduce the recipient's expenditure qualifying for capital allowances.
A payment or other benefit received in connection with a property transaction is not a reverse premium if—
the person entering into the transaction is an individual, and
the transaction relates to premises occupied or to be occupied by the individual as the individual's only or main residence.
A payment or other benefit is not a reverse premium so far as it is consideration for the transfer of an estate or interest in land which constitutes the sale in a sale and leaseback arrangement.
Annotations
Textual amendments
- F1
Words in s. 97(4) inserted (with effect in accordance with s. 381(1) of the amending Act) by Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010 (c. 8), s. 381(1), Sch. 8 para. 263 (with Sch. 9 paras. 1-9, 22)
- F2
Words in s. 97(4) substituted (with effect in accordance with s. 1184(1) of the amending Act) by Corporation Tax Act 2010 (c. 4), s. 1184(1), Sch. 1 para. 596 (with Sch. 2)
Notes on Part 3
Modifications
- C1
Pt. 3 modified (1.1.2010) by Northern Rock plc (Tax Consequences) Regulations 2009 (S.I. 2009/3227), regs. 1, 4(1)