OpenLegislation

2003/644/EC: Commission Decision of 8 September 2003 establishing additional guarantees regarding salmonella for consignments to Finland and Sweden of breeding poultry and day-old chicks for introduction into flocks of breeding poultry or flocks of productive poultry (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2003) 3190)

EU Decision 2003/644 · Adopted 8 September 2003 · Extends to United Kingdom

Original text. legislation.gov.uk does not revise this item, so later amendments are not shown here. Changes made to it are listed under each provision when known.

Commission Decision

of 8 September 2003

establishing additional guarantees regarding salmonella for consignments to Finland and Sweden of breeding poultry and day-old chicks for introduction into flocks of breeding poultry or flocks of productive poultry

(notified under document number C(2003) 3190)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2003/644/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/539/EEC of 15 October 1990 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in, and imports from third countries of, poultry and hatching eggsf1, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003f2, and in particular Article 9a(2) thereof,

Whereas:

(1)

Commission Decision 95/160/EC of 21 April 1995 establishing additional guarantees regarding salmonella for consignments to Finland and Sweden of breeding poultry and day-old chicks for introduction into flocks of breeding poultry or flocks of productive poultryf3, has been substantially amendedf4. In the interests of clarity and rationality the said Decision should be codified.

(2)

The Commission has approved the operational programmes submitted by Finland and Sweden regarding salmonella controls. Those programmes include specific measures for breeding poultry and for day-old chicks for introduction into flocks of breeding poultry or flocks of productive poultry.

(3)

Guarantees should be established equivalent to those implemented by Finland and Sweden under their operational programmes.

(4)

The detailed guarantees are to be based in particular on a microbiological examination of the poultry to be sent to Finland and Sweden.

(5)

In this context different rules should be laid down for breeding poultry and day-old chicks.

(6)

Rules should be established for this microbiological examination of samples by laying down the sampling method, the number of samples to be taken and the microbiological methods for examining the samples.

(7)

Those guarantees should not be applicable to any flock that is subject to a programme recognised as equivalent to that implemented by Finland and Sweden.

(8)

With regard to consignments originating from third countries, Finland and Sweden should apply import requirements at least as stringent as those laid down in this Decision.

(9)

The methods described in this Decision take into account the opinion of the European Food Safety Authority.

(10)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Annotations to the whole text

Footnotes

f1

OJ L 303, 31.10.1990, p. 6.

f2

OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1.

f3

OJ L 105, 9.5.1995, p. 40.

f4

See Annex IV.

Contents

  1. 1Article 1
  2. 2Article 2
  3. 3Article 3
  4. 4Article 4
  5. 5Article 5
  6. 6Article 6 Repealed
  7. 7Article 7
  8. 8Article 8 Repealed
  9. Signature
  10. Annex I
  11. 1General rules
  12. 2Sampling method and number of samples to be taken
  13. 3Microbiological methods for examination of the samples
  14. Annex IIAnnex II
  15. Annex IIIAnnex III
  16. Annex IVAnnex IV
  17. Annex VAnnex V

1

Breeding poultry to be sent to Finland F1, Norway and Sweden shall be subject to a microbiological test, effected by sampling in the flock of origin.

2

The microbiological test referred to in Article 1 shall be carried out as laid down in Annex I.

3

1.

Breeding poultry to be sent to Finland F1, Norway and Sweden shall be accompanied by the certificate shown in Annex II.

F22.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4

Day-old chicks to be sent to Finland F1, Norway or Sweden for introduction into flocks of breeding poultry or flocks of productive poultry must come from hatching eggs from breeding poultry that have been subjected to the test provided for in Article 2.

5

1.

Day-old chicks to be sent to Finland F1, Norway or Sweden for introduction into flocks of breeding poultry or flocks of productive poultry must be accompanied by a certificate as shown in Annex III.

F22.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7

Decision 95/160/EC is repealed.

References to the repealed Decision shall be construed as references to this Decision and shall be read in accordance with the correlation table in Annex V.

8F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Signature

Done at Brussels, 8 September 2003.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

1General rules

The flock of origin must be isolated for 15 days.

The microbiological test must cover all the salmonella serotypes.

2Sampling method and number of samples to be taken

The sampling method and the number of samples to be taken must be as laid down in F1point 2.1.1 of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EU) No 200/2010 implementing Regulation (EC) No 2160/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards a Union target for the reduction of the prevalence of Salmonella serotypes in adult breeding flocks of Gallus gallus.

3Microbiological methods for examination of the samples

  • Microbiological testing of the samples for salmonella should be carried out to the standard of the International Organisation for Standardisation F1ISO 6579 as it has effect for the time being.

  • F2...

Annex II

Annex III

Annex IV

Repealed Decision with its amendment

Commission Decision 95/160/EC (OJ L 105, 9.5.1995, p. 40)
Commission Decision 97/278/EC (OJ L 110, 26.4.1997, p. 77)only Article 1

Annex V

CORRELATION TABLE

Decision 95/160/ECThis Decision
Articles 1 to 6Articles 1 to 6
Article 7—
—Article 7
Article 8Article 8
Annex IAnnex I
Annex IIAnnex II
Annex IIIAnnex III
—Annex IV
—Annex V