..., the key question is whether short-term action plans still offer a significant additional potential for reducing the risk of exceedances of the alert value (240 μg/m3) or for reducing their duration or severity.

In the following the guidance on appropriate short-term actions is given with regard to geographical differences, regional extension and duration of possible measures.

1GEOGRAPHICAL ASPECTF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2REGIONAL EXTENSION OF MEASURESF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3SHORT-TERM VERSUS LONG-TERM MEASURESF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1.FIELD EXPERIMENT: HEILBRONN/NECKARSULM (GERMANY)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.GERMAN PROGRAMME OF CONTROL CONCEPTS AND MEASURES FOR OZONE - "SUMMER SMOG"F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.THE NETHERLANDSF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.AUSTRIAF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.FRANCEF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.GREECEF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Annex IIIGUIDELINES ON A STRATEGY TO MEASURE OZONE PRECURSORS ...F1

Appropriate authorities are required ... to monitor ozone precursors at least in one measuring station. ... ... the objectives of ... monitoring should be:

to analyse trends,
to check efficiency of emission reduction strategies,
to check consistency of emission inventories,
to help attribute the contribution of emission sources to pollution concentration,
to support the understanding of ozone formation and precursor dispersion,
to support the understanding of photochemical models.

1RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A MONITORING STRATEGYF1

The foremost objective of monitoring ozone precursors should be to analyse trends and thereby check the efficiency of emission reductions. Additional source related trend analyses are recommended.

To check the consistency of inventories and to attribute the contribution of particular sources is considered a rather difficult task on a regular basis in the monitoring networks. With one mandatory station alone, these objectives cannot be reached. Consequently, additional voluntary measurements nationally or in international cooperation are recommended. While for trend analysis long-term continuous monitoring is indispensable, measurement campaigns are more appropriate for source attribution studies. During such measurement campaigns it is recommended to analyse the full spectrum of the VOC listed in Annex VI to Directive 2002/3/EC. To support the understanding of ozone formation, of precursor dispersion, and of photochemical models, in addition to the VOC listed in Annex VI to Directive 2002/3/EC, measurements of photo-reactive species (e.g. HO2- and RO2-radicals, PAN) are advisable. For this more research oriented monitoring, again, measurement campaigns are recommended.

It may be supposed that the NOx monitoring is covered by following the requirements of Directive 1999/30/EC. Parallel monitoring of VOC with NOx is recommended.

1.1Recommendations for the location of the mandatory measuring stationF1

Appropriate authorities shall set up at least one station to analyse the general trend of the precursors. It is recommended to place the corresponding station monitoring the full spectrum of VOC listed in Annex VI to Directive 2002/3/EC at a site representative for precursor emissions and ozone formation. Preferably this site should be located in the urban background and should not be directly influenced by local strong sources such as traffic or large industrial installations.

1.2.1Monitoring rural background concentrationsF1

Measurements of VOC at rural background stations are part of the EMEP monitoring programme. It is particularly recommended to set up monitoring sites in those areas where no EMEP monitoring sites exist. In the south it should be considered to include some of the most abundant biogenic hydrocarbons, e. g. the monoterpenes α-pinene and limonene, in the monitoring programme.

1.2.2Source oriented monitoringF1

Major sources of VOC are road traffic, particular industrial plants and the use of solvents. The compounds to be monitored for analysing trends depend on the source type whereby the following strategy is recommended.

Road traffic
BTX-monitoring is useful to analyse trends in emissions from road traffic but monitoring of more components, e.g. acetylene, may be necessary. With regard to the expected reduction of benzene in fuels it should be ensured that in any case toluene and xylenes are analysed. The full VOC spectrum should be monitored at least at one traffic site. In general strong similarities in spectrum may be expected at different sites with similar characteristics of the vehicle fleet.
Industrial plants
Petrochemical plants emit a broad spectrum of VOC. The decision on compounds to be monitored depends strongly on this spectrum and must be based on a case-by-case study. At least one monitoring station should be located upwind and downwind of the major sources with respect to the prevailing wind direction.
Solvent use (commercial areas)
The decision on the selection of VOC to be monitored is most difficult in this case, as there may be several minor sources. It should be based on any knowledge on the spectrum emitted giving also regard to cover those with the highest ozone production potential.

2004/279/EC: Commission Decision of 19 March 2004 concerning guidance for implementation of Directive 2002/3/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to ozone in ambient air (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2004) 764) (revoked)

Annotations to the whole text

Textual amendments

Contents