OpenLegislation

Commission Decision of 26 April 2006 declaring a concentration compatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.3916 — T-Mobile Austria/tele.ring) (notified under document number C(2006) 1695) (Only the German version is authentic) (2007/193/EC) (revoked) in Wales

EU Decision 2007/193 · Adopted 26 April 2006 · Extends to United Kingdom

Original text. legislation.gov.uk does not revise this item, so later amendments are not shown here. Changes made to it are listed under each provision when known.

Commission Decision

of 26 April 2006

declaring a concentration compatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement

(Case COMP/M.3916 — T-Mobile Austria/tele.ring)

(notified under document number C(2006) 1695)

(Only the German version is authentic)

(2007/193/EC) (revoked)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

On 26 April 2006 the Commission adopted a Decision in a merger case under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings, and in particular Article 8(2) of that Regulation. A non-confidential version of the full Decision can be found in the authentic language of the case and in the working languages of the Commission on the website of the Directorate-General for Competition, at the following address: http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/index_en.html

Annotations to the whole text

Textual amendments

F1

Decision revoked (31.12.2020) by The Competition (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/93), reg. 1(1), Sch. 3 para. 2 (as amended by S.I. 2020/1343, reg. 34(3)); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)

Contents

  1. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION Repealed
  2. (1)Division (1) Repealed
  3. (2)Division (2) Repealed
  4. (3)Division (3) Repealed
  5. (4)Division (4) Repealed
  6. 1The relevant product markets Repealed
  7. (5)Division (5) Repealed
  8. (6)Division (6) Repealed
  9. (7)Division (7) Repealed
  10. 2The relevant geographic markets Repealed
  11. (8)Division (8) Repealed
  12. 3Affected markets and competition analysis Repealed
  13. (9)Division (9) Repealed
  14. (10)Division (10) Repealed
  15. (11)Division (11) Repealed
  16. (12)Division (12) Repealed
  17. (13)Division (13) Repealed
  18. (14)Division (14) Repealed
  19. (15)Division (15) Repealed
  20. (16)Division (16) Repealed
  21. (17)Division (17) Repealed
  22. (18)Division (18) Repealed
  23. (19)Division (19) Repealed
  24. Conclusion Repealed
  25. (20)Division (20) Repealed
  26. 4Commitments offered by the Parties Repealed
  27. (21)Division (21) Repealed
  28. (22)Division (22) Repealed
  29. (23)Division (23) Repealed
  30. 5Assessment of the commitments submitted Repealed
  31. (24)Division (24) Repealed
  32. (25)Division (25) Repealed

SUMMARY OF THE DECISIONF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(1)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(2)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(3)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(4)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1The relevant product marketsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(5)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(6)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(7)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2The relevant geographic marketsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(8)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3Affected markets and competition analysisF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(9)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(10)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(11)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(12)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(13)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(14)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(15)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(16)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(17)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(18)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(19)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ConclusionF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(20)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4Commitments offered by the PartiesF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(21)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(22)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(23)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5Assessment of the commitments submittedF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(24)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(25)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .