OpenLegislation

Commission Decision of 18 August 2006 declaring a concentration compatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.3848 — Sea-Invest/EMO-EKOM) (notified under document number C(2006) 3710) (Only the English text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (2007/687/EC) (revoked) in England

EU Decision 2007/687 · Adopted 18 August 2006 · Extends to United Kingdom

Original text. legislation.gov.uk does not revise this item, so later amendments are not shown here. Changes made to it are listed under each provision when known.

Commission Decision

of 18 August 2006

declaring a concentration compatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement

(Case COMP/M.3848 — Sea-Invest/EMO-EKOM)

(notified under document number C(2006) 3710)

(Only the English text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/687/EC) (revoked)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

On 18 August 2006 the Commission adopted a Decision in a merger case under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation), and in particular Article 8(2) of that Regulation. A non-confidential version of the full Decision can be found in the authentic language of the case on the website of the Directorate-General for Competition, at the following address: http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competiton/index_en.html

Annotations to the whole text

Textual amendments

F1

Decision revoked (31.12.2020) by The Competition (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/93), reg. 1(1), Sch. 3 para. 2 (as amended by S.I. 2020/1343, reg. 34(3)); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)

Contents

  1. ISUMMARY Repealed
  2. (1)Division (1) Repealed
  3. (2)Division (2) Repealed
  4. (3)Division (3) Repealed
  5. (4)Division (4) Repealed
  6. (5)Division (5) Repealed
  7. (6)Division (6) Repealed
  8. (7)Division (7) Repealed
  9. IIEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM Repealed
  10. 1THE RELEVANT PRODUCT MARKETS Repealed
  11. (8)Division (8) Repealed
  12. (9)Division (9) Repealed
  13. (10)Division (10) Repealed
  14. (11)Division (11) Repealed
  15. (12)Division (12) Repealed
  16. (13)Division (13) Repealed
  17. 2THE RELEVANT GEOGRAPHIC MARKETS Repealed
  18. (14)Division (14) Repealed
  19. (15)Division (15) Repealed
  20. (16)Division (16) Repealed
  21. (17)Division (17) Repealed
  22. (18)Division (18) Repealed
  23. (19)Division (19) Repealed
  24. (20)Division (20) Repealed
  25. (21)Division (21) Repealed
  26. (22)Division (22) Repealed
  27. (23)Division (23) Repealed
  28. 3COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENT Repealed
  29. 1Terminals services for hinterland traffic for coal and iron ore Repealed
  30. (a)Unilateral effects Repealed
  31. (i)Strengthening of ABT’s dominance in Antwerp Repealed
  32. (24)Division (24) Repealed
  33. (25)Division (25) Repealed
  34. (26)Division (26) Repealed
  35. (ii)Unilateral price increase of EMO-EKOM Repealed
  36. (27)Division (27) Repealed
  37. (28)Division (28) Repealed
  38. (29)Division (29) Repealed
  39. (b)Coordinated effects Repealed
  40. (30)Division (30) Repealed
  41. (31)Division (31) Repealed
  42. (32)Division (32) Repealed
  43. (c)Article 2(4) Repealed
  44. (33)Division (33) Repealed
  45. 2Terminals services for transhipment traffic for coal and iron ore Repealed
  46. (34)Division (34) Repealed
  47. 4CONCLUSION Repealed
  48. (35)Division (35) Repealed
  49. (36)Division (36) Repealed

ISUMMARYF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(1)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(2)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(3)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(4)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(5)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(6)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(7)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IIEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUMF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1THE RELEVANT PRODUCT MARKETSF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(8)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(9)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(10)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(11)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(12)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(13)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2THE RELEVANT GEOGRAPHIC MARKETSF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(14)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(15)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(16)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(17)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(18)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(19)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(20)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(21)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(22)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(23)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENTF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1Terminals services for hinterland traffic for coal and iron oreF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(a)Unilateral effectsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(i)Strengthening of ABT’s dominance in AntwerpF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(24)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(25)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(26)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(ii)Unilateral price increase of EMO-EKOMF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(27)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(28)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(29)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(b)Coordinated effectsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(30)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(31)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(32)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(c)Article 2(4)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(33)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2Terminals services for transhipment traffic for coal and iron oreF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(34)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4CONCLUSIONF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(35)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(36)F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .