OpenLegislation

Division

United Kingdom

Original text. Later amendments are not shown.

Table 4

Summary of approaches taken for analysing an appropriate rate of return, by KPMG

Source: Notification, Table 5, based on KPMG

(per cent)
ApproachRange of returns (project IRR; post-tax nominal)Comments
Relative risk analysis

8,5-11

(project basis)

Comparison of offshore wind and PPP/PFI returns during construction phase and also UK regulated utilities/nuclear operators during operations phase
Benchmarking Analysis

6-13

(project basis)

Comparison of UK regulated utility/PPP/IWPP/comparable nuclear projects
Project Hurdle Rate analysis10,5-14,5Based on EdF WACC estimates plus premium observed in academic studies from a range of corporates
Financing analysis

9-13 — construction

6-9,5 — operational

Analysis of potential financing structures both during construction and during operations
Assumed debt-financed structure with UK Guarantee

10,2 — Project IRR

12,8 — Levered Equity IRR

Analysis of the Project Return and the Levered Equity Return (for the proposed UK guaranteed debt levels) and at the negotiated SP.

The 10,2 % is due to the tax shield effect on project level cash flows and indicative IUK Guarantee pricing.