OpenLegislation

Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2005 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-using products and amending Council Directive 92/42/EEC and Directives 96/57/EC and 2000/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (repealed)

EU Directive 2005/32 · Adopted 6 July 2005 · Extends to United Kingdom

Original text. legislation.gov.uk does not revise this item, so later amendments are not shown here. Changes made to it are listed under each provision when known.

Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

of 6 July 2005

establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-using products and amending Council Directive 92/42/EEC and Directives 96/57/EC and 2000/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Annotations to the whole text

Textual amendments

F1

Repealed by Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (recast) (Text with EEA relevance).

Contents

  1. 1Subject matter and scope Repealed
  2. 2Definitions Repealed
  3. 3Placing on the market and/or putting into service Repealed
  4. 4Responsibilities of the importer Repealed
  5. 5Marking and declaration of conformity Repealed
  6. 6Free movement Repealed
  7. 7Safeguard clause Repealed
  8. 8Conformity assessment Repealed
  9. 9Presumption of conformity Repealed
  10. 10Harmonised standards Repealed
  11. 11Requirements for components and sub-assemblies Repealed
  12. 12Administrative cooperation and exchange of information Repealed
  13. 13Small and medium-sized enterprises Repealed
  14. 14Consumer information Repealed
  15. 15Implementing measures Repealed
  16. 16Working plan Repealed
  17. 17Self-regulation Repealed
  18. 18Consultation Forum Repealed
  19. 19Committee procedure Repealed
  20. 20Penalties Repealed
  21. 21Amendments Repealed
  22. 22Repeals Repealed
  23. 23Review Repealed
  24. 24Confidentiality Repealed
  25. 25Implementation Repealed
  26. 26Entry into force Repealed
  27. 27Addressees Repealed
  28. Annex IMethod for setting generic Eco-design requirements Repealed
  29. Part 1. Ecodesign parameters for EuPs Repealed
  30. 1.1In so far as they relate to product design, significant environmental aspects are identified with reference to the following phases of the life cycle of the product: Repealed
  31. 1.2For each phase, the following environmental aspects are to be assessed where relevant: Repealed
  32. 1.3In particular, the following parameters will be used, as appropriate, and supplemented by others, where necessary, for evaluating the potential for improving the environmental aspects mentioned in the previous paragraph: Repealed
  33. 2. Requirements relating to the supply of informatPart 2. Requirements relating to the supply of informat Repealed
  34. Part 3. Requirements for the manufacturer Repealed
  35. 1Addressing the environmental aspects identified in the implementing measure as capable of being influenced in a substantial manner through product design, manufacturers of EuPs will be required to perform an assessment of the EuP model throughout its lifecycle, based upon realistic assumptions about normal conditions and purposes of use. Other environmental aspects may be examined on a voluntary basis. Repealed
  36. 2Manufacturers will make use of this assessment to evaluate alternative design solutions and the achieved environmental performance of the product against benchmarks. Repealed
  37. Annex IIMethod for setting specific ecodesign requirements Repealed
  38. Annex IIICE marking Repealed
  39. Annex IV: Internal design control Repealed
  40. 1Division 1 Repealed
  41. 2A technical documentation file making possible an assessment of the conformity of the EuP with the requirements of the applicable implementing measure will be compiled by the manufacturer. Repealed
  42. 3Division 3 Repealed
  43. Annex V: Management system for assessing conformity Repealed
  44. 1Division 1 Repealed
  45. 2Division 2 Repealed
  46. 3Environmental elements of the management system Repealed
  47. 3.1The environmental product performance policy Repealed
  48. 3.2Planning Repealed
  49. 3.3Division 3.3 Repealed
  50. 3.3.1The documentation concerning the management system should cover the following, in particular: Repealed
  51. 3.3.2The documentation concerning the EuP will specify, in particular: Repealed
  52. 3.4Checking and corrective action Repealed
  53. Annex VIDeclaration of conformity Repealed
  54. Annex VIIContents of the implementing measures Repealed
  55. Annex VIIIAnnex VIII Repealed
  56. 1Openness of participation Repealed
  57. 2Added value Repealed
  58. 3Representativeness Repealed
  59. 4Quantified and staged objectives Repealed
  60. 5Involvement of civil society Repealed
  61. 6Monitoring and reporting Repealed
  62. 7Cost-effectiveness of administering a self-regulatory initiative Repealed
  63. 8Sustainability Repealed
  64. 9Incentive compatibility Repealed

1Subject matter and scopeF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2DefinitionsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3Placing on the market and/or putting into serviceF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4Responsibilities of the importerF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5Marking and declaration of conformityF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6Free movementF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7Safeguard clauseF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8Conformity assessmentF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9Presumption of conformityF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10Harmonised standardsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

11Requirements for components and sub-assembliesF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12Administrative cooperation and exchange of informationF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

13Small and medium-sized enterprisesF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

14Consumer informationF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

15Implementing measuresF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

16Working planF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17Self-regulationF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

18Consultation ForumF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

19Committee procedureF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

20PenaltiesF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

21AmendmentsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

22RepealsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

23ReviewF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

24ConfidentialityF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

25ImplementationF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

26Entry into forceF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

27AddresseesF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Annex IMethod for setting generic Eco-design requirementsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1.1In so far as they relate to product design, significant environmental aspects are identified with reference to the following phases of the life cycle of the product:F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1.2For each phase, the following environmental aspects are to be assessed where relevant:F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1.3In particular, the following parameters will be used, as appropriate, and supplemented by others, where necessary, for evaluating the potential for improving the environmental aspects mentioned in the previous paragraph:F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2. Requirements relating to the supply of informatF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1Addressing the environmental aspects identified in the implementing measure as capable of being influenced in a substantial manner through product design, manufacturers of EuPs will be required to perform an assessment of the EuP model throughout its lifecycle, based upon realistic assumptions about normal conditions and purposes of use. Other environmental aspects may be examined on a voluntary basis.F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2Manufacturers will make use of this assessment to evaluate alternative design solutions and the achieved environmental performance of the product against benchmarks.F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Annex IIMethod for setting specific ecodesign requirementsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Annex IIICE markingF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2A technical documentation file making possible an assessment of the conformity of the EuP with the requirements of the applicable implementing measure will be compiled by the manufacturer.F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3Environmental elements of the management systemF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.1The environmental product performance policyF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.2PlanningF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.3F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.3.1The documentation concerning the management system should cover the following, in particular:F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.3.2The documentation concerning the EuP will specify, in particular:F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.4Checking and corrective actionF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Annex VIDeclaration of conformityF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Annex VIIContents of the implementing measuresF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Annex VIIIF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1Openness of participationF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2Added valueF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3RepresentativenessF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4Quantified and staged objectivesF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5Involvement of civil societyF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6Monitoring and reportingF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7Cost-effectiveness of administering a self-regulatory initiativeF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8SustainabilityF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9Incentive compatibilityF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .