Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions (recast) (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)
EU Directive 2006/48 · Adopted 14 June 2006 · Extends to United Kingdom
Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 14 June 2006
relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions (recast)
(Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)
F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Annotations to the whole text
Textual amendments
Contents
- Title I: SUBJECT MATTER, SCOPE AND DEFINITIONS
- 1Article 1 Repealed
- 2Article 2 Repealed
- 3Article 3 Repealed
- 4Article 4 Repealed
- 5Article 5 Repealed
- Title II: REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESS TO THE TAKING UP AND PURSUIT OF THE BUSINESS OF CREDIT INSTITUTIONS
- 6Article 6 Repealed
- 7Article 7 Repealed
- 8Article 8 Repealed
- 9Article 9 Repealed
- 10Article 10 Repealed
- 11Article 11 Repealed
- 12Article 12 Repealed
- 13Article 13 Repealed
- 14Article 14 Repealed
- 15Article 15 Repealed
- 16Article 16 Repealed
- 17Article 17 Repealed
- 18Article 18 Repealed
- 19Article 19 Repealed
- 19aArticle 19a Repealed
- 19bArticle 19b Repealed
- 20Article 20 Repealed
- 21Article 21 Repealed
- 22Article 22 Repealed
- Title III: PROVISIONS CONCERNING THE FREEDOM OF ESTABLISHMENT AND THE FREEDOM TO PROVIDE SERVICES
- Credit institutions Repealed
- 23Article 23 Repealed
- Financial institutions Repealed
- 24Article 24 Repealed
- Exercise of the right of establishment Repealed
- 25Article 25 Repealed
- 26Article 26 Repealed
- 27Article 27 Repealed
- Exercise of the freedom to provide services Repealed
- 28Article 28 Repealed
- Powers of the competent authorities of the host Member State Repealed
- 29Article 29 Repealed
- 30Article 30 Repealed
- 31Article 31 Repealed
- 32Article 32 Repealed
- 33Article 33 Repealed
- 34Article 34 Repealed
- 35Article 35 Repealed
- 36Article 36 Repealed
- 37Article 37 Repealed
- Title IV: RELATIONS WITH THIRD COUNTRIES
- Notification in relation to third countries' undertakings and conditions of access to the markets of these countries Repealed
- 38Article 38 Repealed
- Cooperation with third countries' competent authorities regarding supervision on a consolidated basis Repealed
- 39Article 39 Repealed
- Title V: PRINCIPLES AND TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR PRUDENTIAL SUPERVISION AND DISCLOSURE
- Chapter 1: Principles of prudential supervision Repealed
- Competence of home and host Member State Repealed
- 40Article 40 Repealed
- 41Article 41 Repealed
- 42Article 42 Repealed
- 42aArticle 42a Repealed
- 42bArticle 42b Repealed
- 43Article 43 Repealed
- Exchange of information and professional secrecy Repealed
- 44Article 44 Repealed
- 45Article 45 Repealed
- 46Article 46 Repealed
- 47Article 47 Repealed
- 48Article 48 Repealed
- 49Article 49 Repealed
- 50Article 50 Repealed
- 51Article 51 Repealed
- 52Article 52 Repealed
- Duty of persons responsible for the legal control of annual and consolidated accounts Repealed
- 53Article 53 Repealed
- Power of sanction and right to apply to the courts Repealed
- 54Article 54 Repealed
- 55Article 55 Repealed
- Chapter 2: Technical instruments of prudential supervision Repealed
- Own funds Repealed
- 56Article 56 Repealed
- 57Article 57 Repealed
- 58Article 58 Repealed
- 59Article 59 Repealed
- 60Article 60 Repealed
- 61Article 61 Repealed
- 62Article 62 Repealed
- 63Article 63 Repealed
- 63aArticle 63a Repealed
- 64Article 64 Repealed
- 65Article 65 Repealed
- 66Article 66 Repealed
- 67Article 67 Repealed
- Provision against risks Repealed
- Level of application Repealed
- 68Article 68 Repealed
- 69Article 69 Repealed
- 70Article 70 Repealed
- 71Article 71 Repealed
- 72Article 72 Repealed
- 72aArticle 72a Repealed
- 73Article 73 Repealed
- Calculation and reporting requirements Repealed
- 74Article 74 Repealed
- Minimum level of own funds Repealed
- 75Article 75 Repealed
- Minimum own funds requirements for credit risk Repealed
- 76Article 76 Repealed
- 77Article 77 Repealed
- Standardised approach Repealed
- 78Article 78 Repealed
- 79Article 79 Repealed
- 80Article 80 Repealed
- 81Article 81 Repealed
- 82Article 82 Repealed
- 83Article 83 Repealed
- Internal Ratings Based Approach Repealed
- 84Article 84 Repealed
- 85Article 85 Repealed
- 86Article 86 Repealed
- 87Article 87 Repealed
- 88Article 88 Repealed
- 89Article 89 Repealed
- Credit risk mitigation Repealed
- 90Article 90 Repealed
- 91Article 91 Repealed
- 92Article 92 Repealed
- 93Article 93 Repealed
- Securitisation Repealed
- 94Article 94 Repealed
- 95Article 95 Repealed
- 96Article 96 Repealed
- 97Article 97 Repealed
- 98Article 98 Repealed
- 99Article 99 Repealed
- 100Article 100 Repealed
- 101Article 101 Repealed
- Minimum own funds requirements for operational risk Repealed
- 102Article 102 Repealed
- 103Article 103 Repealed
- 104Article 104 Repealed
- 105Article 105 Repealed
- Large exposures Repealed
- 106Article 106 Repealed
- 107Article 107 Repealed
- 108Article 108 Repealed
- 109Article 109 Repealed
- 110Article 110 Repealed
- 111Article 111 Repealed
- 112Article 112 Repealed
- 113Article 113 Repealed
- 114Article 114 Repealed
- 115Article 115 Repealed
- 116Article 116 Repealed
- 117Article 117 Repealed
- 118Article 118 Repealed
- 119Article 119 Repealed
- Qualifying holdings outside the financial sector Repealed
- 120Article 120 Repealed
- 121Article 121 Repealed
- 122Article 122 Repealed
- Exposures to transferred credit risk Repealed
- 122aArticle 122a Repealed
- Chapter 3: Credit institutions' assessment process Repealed
- 123Article 123 Repealed
- Chapter 4: Supervision and disclosure by competent authorities Repealed
- Supervision Repealed
- 124Article 124 Repealed
- 125Article 125 Repealed
- 126Article 126 Repealed
- 127Article 127 Repealed
- 128Article 128 Repealed
- 129Article 129 Repealed
- 130Article 130 Repealed
- 131Article 131 Repealed
- 131aArticle 131a Repealed
- 132Article 132 Repealed
- 133Article 133 Repealed
- 134Article 134 Repealed
- 135Article 135 Repealed
- 136Article 136 Repealed
- 137Article 137 Repealed
- 138Article 138 Repealed
- 139Article 139 Repealed
- 140Article 140 Repealed
- 141Article 141 Repealed
- 142Article 142 Repealed
- 143Article 143 Repealed
- Disclosure by competent authorities Repealed
- 144Article 144 Repealed
- Chapter 5: Disclosure by credit institutions Repealed
- 145Article 145 Repealed
- 146Article 146 Repealed
- 146aArticle 146a Repealed
- 147Article 147 Repealed
- 148Article 148 Repealed
- 149Article 149 Repealed
- Title VI: DELEGATED ACTS AND POWERS OF EXECUTION
- 150Article 150 Repealed
- 151Article 151 Repealed
- 151aExercise of the delegation Repealed
- 151bRevocation of the delegation Repealed
- 151cObjections to delegated acts Repealed
- Title VII: TRANSITIONAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS
- Chapter 1: Transitional provisions Repealed
- 152Article 152 Repealed
- 153Article 153 Repealed
- 154Article 154 Repealed
- 155Article 155 Repealed
- Chapter 2: Final provisions Repealed
- 156Article 156 Repealed
- 156aArticle 156a Repealed
- 157Article 157 Repealed
- 158Article 158 Repealed
- 159Article 159 Repealed
- 160Article 160 Repealed
- Annex I: LIST OF ACTIVITIES SUBJECT TO MUTUAL RECOGNITION Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- 7Trading for own account or for account of customers in: Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- 9Division 9 Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- 11Division 11 Repealed
- 12Division 12 Repealed
- 13Division 13 Repealed
- 14Safe custody services Repealed
- 15Division 15 Repealed
- Annex IICLASSIFICATION OF OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ITEMS Repealed
- Annex III: THE TREATMENT OF COUNTERPARTY CREDIT RISK OF DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS, REPURCHASE TRANSACTIONS, SECURITIES ORCOMMODITIES LENDING OR BORROWING TRANSACTIONS, LONG SETTLEMENT TRANSACTIONS AND MARGIN LENDING TRANSACTIONS Repealed
- Part 1 Repealed
- Definitions Repealed
- General terms Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- Transaction types Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- Netting sets, hedging sets, and related terms Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- 7Division 7 Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- 9Division 9 Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- 11Division 11 Repealed
- 12Division 12 Repealed
- 13Division 13 Repealed
- Distributions Repealed
- 14Division 14 Repealed
- 15Division 15 Repealed
- 16Division 16 Repealed
- 17Division 17 Repealed
- Exposure measures and adjustments Repealed
- 18Division 18 Repealed
- 19Division 19 Repealed
- 20Division 20 Repealed
- 21Division 21 Repealed
- 22Division 22 Repealed
- 23Division 23 Repealed
- 24Division 24 Repealed
- 25Division 25 Repealed
- CCR related risks Repealed
- 26Division 26 Repealed
- 27Division 27 Repealed
- 28Division 28 Repealed
- Part 2 Repealed
- Choice of the method Repealed
- 1Subject to paragraphs 2 to 7, credit institutions shall determine the exposure value for the contracts listed in Annex IV with one of the methods set out in Parts 3 to 6. Credit institutions which are not eligible for the treatment set out in Article 18(2) of Directive 2006/49/EC are not permitted to use the method set out in Part 4. To determine the exposure value for the contracts listed in point 3 of Annex IV, credit institutions are not permitted to use the method set out in Part 4. Repealed
- 2Subject to the approval of the competent authorities, credit institutions may determine the exposure value for: Repealed
- 3When a credit institution purchases credit derivative protection against a non-trading book exposure, or against a CCR exposure, it may compute its capital requirement for the hedged asset in accordance with Annex VIII, Part 3, points 83 to 92, or subject to the approval of the competent authorities, in accordance with Annex VII, Part 1, point 4 or Annex VII, Part 4, points 96 to 104. Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- 7Division 7 Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- Part 3 Repealed
- Mark-to-Market Method Repealed
- Step (a):Division Step (a): Repealed
- Step (b):to obtain a figure for potential future credit exposure, except in the case of single-currency ‘floating/floating’ interest rate swaps in which only the current replacement cost will be calculated, the notional principal amounts or underlying values are multiplied by the percentages in Table 1: Repealed
- Step (c):Division Step (c): Repealed
- Part 4 Repealed
- Original Exposure Method Repealed
- Step (a):the notional principal amount of each instrument is multiplied by the percentages given in Table 3. Repealed
- Step (b):Division Step (b): Repealed
- Part 5 Repealed
- Standardised Method Repealed
- 1The Standardised Method (SM) can be used only for OTC derivatives and long settlement transactions. The exposure value shall be calculated separately for each netting set. It shall be determined net of collateral, as follows: Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- 7Division 7 Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- 9Division 9 Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- 11Credit institutions may use the following formulae to determine the size and sign of a risk position: Repealed
- 12The risk positions are to be grouped into hedging sets. For each hedging set, the absolute value amount of the sum of the resulting risk positions is computed. This sum is termed the ‘net risk position’ and is represented by: Repealed
- 13For interest rate risk positions from money deposits received from the counterparty as collateral, from payment legs and from underlying debt instruments, to which according to Table 1 of Annex I to Directive 2006/49/EC a capital charge of 1,6 % or less applies, there are six hedging sets for each currency, as set out in Table 4 below. Hedging sets are defined by a combination of the criteria ‘maturity’ and ‘referenced interest rates’. Repealed
- 14Division 14 Repealed
- 15There is one hedging set for each issuer of a reference debt instrument that underlies a credit default swap. ‘Nth to default’ basket credit default swaps shall be treated as follows: Repealed
- 16Division 16 Repealed
- 17Underlying financial instruments other than debt instruments shall be assigned to the same respective hedging sets only if they are identical or similar instruments. In all other cases they shall be assigned to separate hedging sets. The similarity of instruments is established as follows: Repealed
- 18The CCR multipliers (CCRM) for the different hedging set categories are set out in Table 5 below: Repealed
- 19Division 19 Repealed
- 20Division 20 Repealed
- 21Division 21 Repealed
- Part 6 Repealed
- Internal Model Method Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- Exposure value Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- 7The exposure value shall be calculated as the product of α times Effective EPE, as follows: Repealed
- 8Effective EE shall be computed recursively as: Repealed
- 9In this regard, Effective EPE is the average Effective EE during the first year of future exposure. If all contracts in the netting set mature within less than one year, EPE is the average of EE until all contracts in the netting set mature. Effective EPE is computed as a weighted average of Effective EE: Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- 11Division 11 Repealed
- 12Division 12 Repealed
- 13Division 13 Repealed
- 14Division 14 Repealed
- 15If the netting set is subject to a margin agreement, credit institutions shall use one of the following EPE measures: Repealed
- 16Division 16 Repealed
- CCR control Repealed
- 17Division 17 Repealed
- 18Division 18 Repealed
- 19Division 19 Repealed
- 20Division 20 Repealed
- 21Division 21 Repealed
- 22Division 22 Repealed
- 23Division 23 Repealed
- 24Division 24 Repealed
- 25Division 25 Repealed
- 26A credit institution shall conduct an independent review of its CCR management system regularly through its own internal auditing process. This review shall include both the activities of the business units referred to in point 17 and of the independent CCR control unit. A review of the overall CCR management process shall take place at regular intervals and shall specifically address, at a minimum: Repealed
- Use test Repealed
- 27Division 27 Repealed
- 28Division 28 Repealed
- 29Division 29 Repealed
- 30Division 30 Repealed
- 31Division 31 Repealed
- Stress testing Repealed
- 32Division 32 Repealed
- 33Division 33 Repealed
- Wrong-Way Risk Repealed
- 34Division 34 Repealed
- 35Division 35 Repealed
- Integrity of the modelling process Repealed
- 36Division 36 Repealed
- 37Division 37 Repealed
- 38Division 38 Repealed
- 39A credit institution shall monitor the appropriate risks and have processes in place to adjust its estimation of EPE when those risks become significant. This includes the following: Repealed
- 40Division 40 Repealed
- 41Division 41 Repealed
- Validation requirements for EPE models Repealed
- 42A credit institution's EPE model shall meet the following validation requirements: Repealed
- Part 7 Repealed
- Contractual netting (contracts for novation and other netting agreements) Repealed
- Annex IV: TYPES OF DERIVATIVES Repealed
- 1Interest-rate contracts: Repealed
- 2Foreign-exchange contracts and contracts concerning gold: Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- Annex V: TECHNICAL CRITERIA CONCERNING THE ORGANISATION AND TREATMENT OF RISKS Repealed
- GOVERNANCE Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- TREATMENT OF RISKS Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- CREDIT AND COUNTERPARTY RISK Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- RESIDUAL RISK Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- CONCENTRATION RISK Repealed
- 7Division 7 Repealed
- SECURITISATION RISK Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- 9Division 9 Repealed
- MARKET RISK Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- INTEREST RATE RISK ARISING FROM NON-TRADING ACTIVITIES Repealed
- 11Division 11 Repealed
- OPERATIONAL RISK Repealed
- 12Division 12 Repealed
- 13Division 13 Repealed
- LIQUIDITY RISK Repealed
- 14Division 14 Repealed
- 14aDivision 14a Repealed
- 15Division 15 Repealed
- 16Division 16 Repealed
- 17Division 17 Repealed
- 18Division 18 Repealed
- 19Division 19 Repealed
- 20Division 20 Repealed
- 21Division 21 Repealed
- 22Division 22 Repealed
- REMUNERATION POLICIES Repealed
- 23When establishing and applying the total remuneration policies, inclusive of salaries and discretionary pension benefits, for categories of staff including senior management, risk takers, staff engaged in control functions and any employee receiving total remuneration that takes them into the same remuneration bracket as senior management and risk takers, whose professional activities have a material impact on their risk profile, credit institutions shall comply with the following principles in a way and to the extent that is appropriate to their size, internal organisation and the nature, the scope and the complexity of their activities: Repealed
- 24Credit institutions that are significant in terms of their size, internal organisation and the nature, the scope and the complexity of their activities shall establish a remuneration committee. The remuneration committee shall be constituted in such a way as to enable it to exercise competent and independent judgment on remuneration policies and practices and the incentives created for managing risk, capital and liquidity. Repealed
- Annex VI: STANDARDISED APPROACH Repealed
- Part 1: RISK WEIGHTS Repealed
- EXPOSURES TO CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS OR CENTRAL BANKS Repealed
- Treatment Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- 2Subject to point 3, exposures to central governments and central banks for which a credit assessment by a nominated ECAI is available shall be assigned a risk weight according to Table 1 in accordance with the assignment by the competent authorities of the credit assessments of eligible ECAIs to six steps in a credit quality assessment scale. Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- Exposures in the national currency of the borrower Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- Use of credit assessments by Export Credit Agencies Repealed
- 6Export Credit Agency credit assessments shall be recognised by the competent authorities if either of the following conditions is met: Repealed
- 7Exposures for which a credit assessment by an Export Credit Agency is recognised for risk weighting purposes shall be assigned a risk weight according to Table 2. Repealed
- EXPOSURES TO REGIONAL GOVERNMENTS OR LOCAL AUTHORITIES Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- 9Exposures to regional governments and local authorities shall be treated as exposures to the central government in whose jurisdiction they are established where there is no difference in risk between such exposures because of the specific revenue-raising powers of the former, and the existence of specific institutional arrangements the effect of which is to reduce their risk of default. Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- 11Division 11 Repealed
- 11aDivision 11a Repealed
- EXPOSURES TO ADMINISTRATIVE BODIES AND NON-COMMERCIAL UNDERTAKINGS Repealed
- Treatment Repealed
- 12Division 12 Repealed
- Public Sector Entities Repealed
- 13Division 13 Repealed
- 14Division 14 Repealed
- 15Division 15 Repealed
- 16Division 16 Repealed
- 17Division 17 Repealed
- EXPOSURES TO MULTILATERAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS Repealed
- Scope Repealed
- 18Division 18 Repealed
- Treatment Repealed
- 19Division 19 Repealed
- 20Exposures to the following multilateral development banks shall be assigned a 0 % risk weight: Repealed
- 21Division 21 Repealed
- EXPOSURES TO INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS Repealed
- 22Exposures to the following international organisations shall be assigned a 0 % risk weight: Repealed
- EXPOSURES TO INSTITUTIONS Repealed
- Treatment Repealed
- 23Division 23 Repealed
- 24Division 24 Repealed
- Risk-weight floor on exposures to unrated institutions Repealed
- 25Division 25 Repealed
- Central government risk weight based method Repealed
- 26Exposures to institutions shall be assigned a risk weight according to the credit quality step to which exposures to the central government of the jurisdiction in which the institution is incorporated are assigned in accordance with Table 3. Repealed
- 27Division 27 Repealed
- 28Division 28 Repealed
- Credit assessment based method Repealed
- 29Exposures to institutions with a residual maturity of more than three months for which a credit assessment by a nominated ECAI is available shall be assigned a risk weight according to Table 4 in accordance with the assignment by the competent authorities of the credit assessments of eligible ECAIs to six steps in a credit quality assessment scale. Repealed
- 30Division 30 Repealed
- 31Exposures to an institution of up to three months residual maturity for which a credit assessment by a nominated ECAI is available shall be assigned a risk-weight according to Table 5 in accordance with the assignment by the competent authorities of the credit assessments of eligible ECAIs to six steps in a credit quality assessment scale: Repealed
- 32Division 32 Repealed
- Interaction with short-term credit assessments Repealed
- 33Division 33 Repealed
- 34Division 34 Repealed
- 35Division 35 Repealed
- 36Division 36 Repealed
- Short-term exposures in the national currency of the borrower Repealed
- 37Division 37 Repealed
- 38Division 38 Repealed
- Investments in regulatory capital instruments Repealed
- 39Division 39 Repealed
- Minimum reserves required by the ECB Repealed
- 40Where an exposure to an institution is in the form of minimum reserves required by the ECB or by the central bank of a Member State to be held by the credit institution, Member States may permit the assignment of the risk weight that would be assigned to exposures to the central bank of the Member State in question provided: Repealed
- EXPOSURES TO CORPORATES Repealed
- Treatment Repealed
- 41Exposures for which a credit assessment by a nominated ECAI is available shall be assigned a risk weight according to Table 6 in accordance with the assignment by the competent authorities of the credit assessments of eligible ECAIs to six steps in a credit quality assessment scale. Repealed
- 42Division 42 Repealed
- RETAIL EXPOSURES Repealed
- 43Division 43 Repealed
- EXPOSURES SECURED BY REAL ESTATE PROPERTY Repealed
- 44Division 44 Repealed
- Exposures secured by mortgages on residential property Repealed
- 45Division 45 Repealed
- 46Division 46 Repealed
- 47Division 47 Repealed
- 48In the exercise of their judgement for the purposes of points 45 to 47, competent authorities shall be satisfied only if the following conditions are met: Repealed
- 49Division 49 Repealed
- 50Division 50 Repealed
- Exposures secured by mortgages on commercial real estate Repealed
- 51Division 51 Repealed
- 52Division 52 Repealed
- 53Division 53 Repealed
- 54The application of points 51 to 53 is subject to the following conditions: Repealed
- 55The 50 % risk weight shall be assigned to the Part of the loan that does not exceed a limit calculated according to either of the following conditions: Repealed
- 56Division 56 Repealed
- 57Division 57 Repealed
- 58Competent authorities may dispense with the condition contained in point 54(b) for exposures fully and completely secured by mortgages on commercial property which is situated within their territory, if they have evidence that a well-developed and long-established commercial real estate market is present in their territory with loss-rates which do not exceed the following limits: Repealed
- 59Division 59 Repealed
- 60Division 60 Repealed
- PAST DUE ITEMS Repealed
- 61Without prejudice to the provisions contained in points 62 to 65, the unsecured part of any item that is past due for more than 90 days and which is above a threshold defined by the competent authorities and which reflects a reasonable level of risk shall be assigned a risk weight of: Repealed
- 62Division 62 Repealed
- 63Division 63 Repealed
- 64Division 64 Repealed
- 65Division 65 Repealed
- ITEMS BELONGING TO REGULATORY HIGH-RISK CATEGORIES Repealed
- 66Division 66 Repealed
- 67Competent authorities may permit non past due items to be assigned a 150 % risk weight according to the provisions of this Part and for which value adjustments have been established to be assigned a risk weight of: Repealed
- EXPOSURES IN THE FORM OF COVERED BONDS Repealed
- 68‘Covered bonds’, shall mean bonds as defined in Article 22(4) of Directive 85/611/EEC and collateralised by any of the following eligible assets: Repealed
- 69Division 69 Repealed
- 70Division 70 Repealed
- 71Covered bonds shall be assigned a risk weight on the basis of the risk weight assigned to senior unsecured exposures to the credit institution which issues them. The following correspondence between risk weights shall apply: Repealed
- ITEMS REPRESENTING SECURITISATION POSITIONS Repealed
- 72Division 72 Repealed
- EXPOSURES TO INSTITUTIONS AND CORPORATES WITH A SHORT-TERM CREDIT ASSESSMENT Repealed
- 73Exposures to institutions where points 29 to 32 apply, and exposures to corporates for which a short-term credit assessment by a nominated ECAI is available shall be assigned a risk weight according to Table 7, in accordance with the mapping by the competent authorities of the credit assessments of eligible ECAIs to six steps in a credit quality assessment scale: Repealed
- EXPOSURES IN THE FORM OF COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT UNDERTAKINGS (CIUS) Repealed
- 74Division 74 Repealed
- 75Exposures in the form of CIUs for which a credit assessment by a nominated ECAI is available shall be assigned a risk weight according to Table 8, in accordance with the assignment by the competent authorities of the credit assessments of eligible ECAIs to six steps in a credit quality assessment scale. Repealed
- 76Division 76 Repealed
- 77Credit institutions may determine the risk weight for a CIU as set out in points 79 to 81, if the following eligibility criteria are met: Repealed
- 78Division 78 Repealed
- 79Division 79 Repealed
- 80Division 80 Repealed
- 81Division 81 Repealed
- OTHER ITEMS Repealed
- Treatment Repealed
- 82Division 82 Repealed
- 83Division 83 Repealed
- 84Division 84 Repealed
- 85Division 85 Repealed
- 86Division 86 Repealed
- 87Division 87 Repealed
- 88Division 88 Repealed
- 89Division 89 Repealed
- 90Division 90 Repealed
- Part 2: Recognition of ECAIs and mapping of their credit assessments Repealed
- METHODOLOGY Repealed
- Objectivity Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- Independence Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- 3Independence of the ECAI's methodology shall be assessed by competent authorities according to factors such as the following: Repealed
- Ongoing review Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- 5Before any recognition, competent authorities shall verify that the assessment methodology for each market segment is established according to standards such as the following: Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- Transparency and disclosure Repealed
- 7Division 7 Repealed
- INDIVIDUAL CREDIT ASSESSMENTS Repealed
- Credibility and market acceptance Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- 9Credibility shall be assessed by competent authorities according to factors such as the following: Repealed
- Transparency and Disclosure Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- 11Division 11 Repealed
- ‘MAPPING’ Repealed
- 12Division 12 Repealed
- 13Division 13 Repealed
- 14Division 14 Repealed
- 15Division 15 Repealed
- 16Division 16 Repealed
- Part 3: Use of ECAIs' credit assessments for the determination of risk weights Repealed
- TREATMENT Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- 7Division 7 Repealed
- ISSUER AND ISSUE CREDIT ASSESSMENT Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- 9Division 9 Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- 11Division 11 Repealed
- LONG-TERM AND SHORT-TERM CREDIT ASSESSMENTS Repealed
- 12Division 12 Repealed
- 13Division 13 Repealed
- 14Division 14 Repealed
- 15Division 15 Repealed
- DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN CURRENCY ITEMS Repealed
- 16Division 16 Repealed
- 17Division 17 Repealed
- Annex VII: INTERNAL RATINGS BASED APPROACH Repealed
- Part 1: Risk weighted exposure amounts and expected loss amounts Repealed
- CALCULATION OF RISK WEIGHTED EXPOSURE AMOUNTS FOR CREDIT RISK Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- Risk weighted exposure amounts for exposures to corporates, institutions and central governments and central banks. Repealed
- 3Subject to points 5 to 9, the risk weighted exposure amounts for exposures to corporates, institutions and central governments and central banks shall be calculated according to the following formulae: Repealed
- 4The risk weighted exposure amount for each exposure which meets the requirements set out in Annex VIII, Part 1, point 29 and Annex VIII, Part 2, point 22 may be adjusted according to the following formula: Repealed
- 5For exposures to companies where the total annual sales for the consolidated group of which the firm is a Part is less than EUR 50 million, credit institutions may use the following correlation formula for the calculation of risk weights for corporate exposures. In this formula S is expressed as total annual sales in millions of Euros with EUR 5 million <= S <= EUR 50 million. Reported sales of less than EUR 5 million shall be treated as if they were equivalent to EUR 5 million. For purchased receivables the total annual sales shall be the weighted average by individual exposures of the pool. Repealed
- 6For specialised lending exposures in respect of which a credit institution cannot demonstrate that its PD estimates meet the minimum requirements set out in Part 4 it shall assign risk weights to these exposures according to Table 1, as follows: Repealed
- 7Division 7 Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- 9Division 9 Repealed
- Risk weighted exposure amounts for retail exposures Repealed
- 10Subject to points 12 and 13, the risk weighted exposure amounts for retail exposures shall be calculated according to the following formulae: Repealed
- 11Division 11 Repealed
- 12Division 12 Repealed
- 13For qualifying revolving retail exposures as defined in points (a) to (e), a correlation (R) of 0,04 shall replace the figure produced by the correlation formula in point 10. Repealed
- 14To be eligible for the retail treatment, purchased receivables shall comply with the minimum requirements set out in Part 4, points 105 to 109 and the following conditions: Repealed
- 15Division 15 Repealed
- 16Division 16 Repealed
- Risk weighted exposure amounts for equity exposures Repealed
- 17Division 17 Repealed
- 18Division 18 Repealed
- Simple risk weight approach Repealed
- 19The risk weighted exposure amount shall be calculated according to the following formula: Repealed
- 20Division 20 Repealed
- 21Division 21 Repealed
- PD/LGD approach Repealed
- 22Division 22 Repealed
- 23Division 23 Repealed
- 24Division 24 Repealed
- Internal models approach Repealed
- 25Division 25 Repealed
- 26Division 26 Repealed
- Risk weighted exposure amounts for other non credit-obligation assets Repealed
- 27The risk weighted exposure amounts shall be calculated according to the following formula: Repealed
- CALCULATION OF RISK WEIGHTED EXPOSURE AMOUNTS FOR DILUTION RISK OF PURCHASED RECEIVABLES Repealed
- 28Risk weights for dilution risk of purchased corporate and retail receivables: Repealed
- CALCULATION OF EXPECTED LOSS AMOUNTS Repealed
- 29Division 29 Repealed
- 30The expected loss amounts for exposures to corporates, institutions, central governments and central banks and retail exposures shall be calculated according to the following formulae: Repealed
- 31The EL values for specialised lending exposures where credit institutions use the methods set out in point 6 for assigning risk weights shall be assigned according to Table 2. Repealed
- 32The expected loss amounts for equity exposures where the risk weighted exposure amounts are calculated according to the methods set out in points 19 to 21, shall be calculated according to the following formula: Repealed
- 33The expected loss amounts for equity exposures where the risk weighted exposure amounts are calculated according to the methods set out in points 22 to 24 shall be calculated according to the following formulae: Repealed
- 34Division 34 Repealed
- 35The expected loss amounts for dilution risk of purchased receivables shall be calculated according to the following formula: Repealed
- TREATMENT OF EXPECTED LOSS AMOUNTS Repealed
- 36Division 36 Repealed
- Part 2: PD, LGD and Maturity Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- EXPOSURES TO CORPORATES, INSTITUTIONS AND CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS AND CENTRAL BANKS Repealed
- PD Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- 7Division 7 Repealed
- LGD Repealed
- 8Credit institutions shall use the following LGD values: Repealed
- 9Division 9 Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- 11Division 11 Repealed
- Maturity Repealed
- 12Division 12 Repealed
- 13Credit institutions permitted to use own LGDs and/or own conversion factors for exposures to corporates, institutions or central governments and central banks shall calculate M for each of these exposures as set out in (a) to (e) and subject to points 14 to 16. In all cases, M shall be no greater than 5 years: Repealed
- 14Notwithstanding point 13(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e), M shall be at least one-day for: Repealed
- 15Division 15 Repealed
- 16Division 16 Repealed
- RETAIL EXPOSURES Repealed
- PD Repealed
- 17Division 17 Repealed
- 18Division 18 Repealed
- 19Division 19 Repealed
- 20Division 20 Repealed
- LGD Repealed
- 21Division 21 Repealed
- 22Division 22 Repealed
- 23Division 23 Repealed
- EQUITY EXPOSURES SUBJECT TO PD/LGD METHOD Repealed
- PD Repealed
- 24PDs shall be determined according to the methods for corporate exposures. Repealed
- LGD Repealed
- 25Division 25 Repealed
- 26Division 26 Repealed
- Maturity Repealed
- 27Division 27 Repealed
- Part 3: Exposure value Repealed
- EXPOSURES TO CORPORATES, INSTITUTIONS, CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS AND CENTRAL BANKS AND RETAIL EXPOSURES. Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4The exposure value for leases shall be the discounted minimum lease payments. Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- 7Division 7 Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- 9The exposure value for the following items shall be calculated as the committed but undrawn amount multiplied by a conversion factor. Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- 11For all off-balance sheet items other than those mentioned in points 1 to 9, the exposure value shall be the following percentage of its value: Repealed
- EQUITY EXPOSURES Repealed
- 12The exposure value shall be the value presented in the financial statements. Admissible equity exposure measures are the following: Repealed
- OTHER NON CREDIT-OBLIGATION ASSETS Repealed
- 13Division 13 Repealed
- Part 4: Minimum requirements for IRB Approach Repealed
- RATING SYSTEMS Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- Structure of rating systems Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- Exposures to corporates, institutions and central governments and central banks Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- 7Division 7 Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- 9Division 9 Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- 11Division 11 Repealed
- 12Division 12 Repealed
- Retail exposures Repealed
- 13Division 13 Repealed
- 14Division 14 Repealed
- 15Division 15 Repealed
- 16Credit institutions shall consider the following risk drivers when assigning exposures to grades or pools. Repealed
- Assignment to grades or pools Repealed
- 17A credit institution shall have specific definitions, processes and criteria for assigning exposures to grades or pools within a rating system. Repealed
- 18Division 18 Repealed
- Assignment of exposures Repealed
- Exposures to corporates, institutions and central governments and central banks Repealed
- 19Division 19 Repealed
- 20Division 20 Repealed
- 21Division 21 Repealed
- 22Division 22 Repealed
- 23Separate exposures to the same obligor shall be assigned to the same obligor grade, irrespective of any differences in the nature of each specific transaction. Exceptions, where separate exposures are allowed to result in multiple grades for the same obligor are: Repealed
- Retail exposures Repealed
- 24Division 24 Repealed
- Overrides Repealed
- 25Division 25 Repealed
- Integrity of assignment process Repealed
- Exposures to corporates, institutions and central governments and central banks Repealed
- 26Division 26 Repealed
- 27Division 27 Repealed
- 28Division 28 Repealed
- Retail exposures Repealed
- 29Division 29 Repealed
- Use of models Repealed
- 30If a credit institution uses statistical models and other mechanical methods to assign exposures to obligors or facilities grades or pools, then: Repealed
- Documentation of rating systems Repealed
- 31Division 31 Repealed
- 32Division 32 Repealed
- 33Division 33 Repealed
- 34If the credit institution employs statistical models in the rating process, the credit institution shall document their methodologies. This material shall: Repealed
- 35Division 35 Repealed
- Data maintenance Repealed
- 36Division 36 Repealed
- Exposures to corporates, institutions and central governments and central banks Repealed
- 37Credit institutions shall collect and store: Repealed
- 38Credit institutions using own estimates of LGDs and/or conversion factors shall collect and store: Repealed
- Retail exposures Repealed
- 39Credit institutions shall collect and store: Repealed
- Stress tests used in assessment of capital adequacy Repealed
- 40Division 40 Repealed
- 41Division 41 Repealed
- 42Division 42 Repealed
- RISK QUANTIFICATION Repealed
- 43Division 43 Repealed
- Definition of default Repealed
- 44A ‘default’ shall be considered to have occurred with regard to a particular obligor when either or both of the two following events has taken place: Repealed
- 45Elements to be taken as indications of unlikeliness to pay shall include: Repealed
- 46Division 46 Repealed
- 47Division 47 Repealed
- 48Division 48 Repealed
- Overall requirements for estimation Repealed
- 49Division 49 Repealed
- 50Division 50 Repealed
- 51Division 51 Repealed
- 52Division 52 Repealed
- 53Division 53 Repealed
- 54Division 54 Repealed
- 55Division 55 Repealed
- 56Division 56 Repealed
- 57If a credit institution uses data that is pooled across credit institutions it shall demonstrate that: Repealed
- 58Division 58 Repealed
- Requirements specific to PD estimation Repealed
- Exposures to corporates, institutions and central governments and central banks Repealed
- 59Division 59 Repealed
- 60Division 60 Repealed
- 61Division 61 Repealed
- 62Division 62 Repealed
- 63Division 63 Repealed
- 64Division 64 Repealed
- 65Division 65 Repealed
- 66Division 66 Repealed
- Retail exposures Repealed
- 67Division 67 Repealed
- 68Division 68 Repealed
- 69Credit institutions shall regard internal data for assigning exposures to grades or pools as the primary source of information for estimating loss characteristics. Credit institutions are permitted to use external data (including pooled data) or statistical models for quantification provided a strong link can be demonstrated between: Repealed
- 70Division 70 Repealed
- 71Division 71 Repealed
- 72Division 72 Repealed
- Requirements specific to own-LGD estimates Repealed
- 73Division 73 Repealed
- 74Division 74 Repealed
- 75Division 75 Repealed
- 76Division 76 Repealed
- 77Division 77 Repealed
- 78Division 78 Repealed
- 79Division 79 Repealed
- 80Division 80 Repealed
- 81Division 81 Repealed
- Exposures to corporates, institutions and central governments and central banks Repealed
- 82Division 82 Repealed
- Retail exposures Repealed
- 83Division 83 Repealed
- 84Division 84 Repealed
- 85Division 85 Repealed
- 86Division 86 Repealed
- Requirements specific to own-conversion factor estimates Repealed
- 87Division 87 Repealed
- 88Division 88 Repealed
- 89Credit institutions' estimates of conversion factors shall reflect the possibility of additional drawings by the obligor up to and after the time a default event is triggered. Repealed
- 90Division 90 Repealed
- 91Division 91 Repealed
- 92Division 92 Repealed
- Exposures to corporates, institutions and central governments and central banks Repealed
- 93Division 93 Repealed
- Retail exposures Repealed
- 94Division 94 Repealed
- 95Division 95 Repealed
- 2.2.4Minimum requirements for assessing the effect of guarantees and credit derivatives Repealed
- 96Division 96 Repealed
- 97Division 97 Repealed
- Eligible guarantors and guarantees Repealed
- 98Division 98 Repealed
- 99Division 99 Repealed
- 100Division 100 Repealed
- Adjustment criteria Repealed
- 101Division 101 Repealed
- 102Division 102 Repealed
- Credit derivatives Repealed
- 103Division 103 Repealed
- 104Division 104 Repealed
- Minimum requirements for purchased receivables Repealed
- Legal certainty Repealed
- 105Division 105 Repealed
- Effectiveness of monitoring systems Repealed
- 106The credit institution shall monitor both the quality of the purchased receivables and the financial condition of the seller and servicer. In particular: Repealed
- Effectiveness of work-out systems Repealed
- 107Division 107 Repealed
- Effectiveness of systems for controlling collateral, credit availability, and cash Repealed
- 108Division 108 Repealed
- Compliance with the credit institution's internal policies and procedures Repealed
- 109Division 109 Repealed
- VALIDATION OF INTERNAL ESTIMATES Repealed
- 110Division 110 Repealed
- 111Division 111 Repealed
- 112Division 112 Repealed
- 113Division 113 Repealed
- 114Division 114 Repealed
- CALCULATION OF RISK WEIGHTED EXPOSURE AMOUNTS FOR EQUITY EXPOSURES UNDER THE INTERNAL MODELS APPROACH Repealed
- Capital requirement and risk quantification Repealed
- 115For the purpose of calculating capital requirements credit institutions shall meet the following standards: Repealed
- Risk management process and controls Repealed
- 116With regard to the development and use of internal models for capital requirement purposes, credit institutions shall establish policies, procedures, and controls to ensure the integrity of the model and modelling process. These policies, procedures, and controls shall include the following: Repealed
- Validation and documentation Repealed
- 117Division 117 Repealed
- 118Division 118 Repealed
- 119Division 119 Repealed
- 120Division 120 Repealed
- 121Division 121 Repealed
- 122Division 122 Repealed
- 123Division 123 Repealed
- CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND OVERSIGHT Repealed
- Corporate Governance Repealed
- 124Division 124 Repealed
- 125Division 125 Repealed
- 126Division 126 Repealed
- 127Division 127 Repealed
- Credit risk control Repealed
- 128Division 128 Repealed
- 129The areas of responsibility for the credit risk control unit(s) shall include: Repealed
- 130Notwithstanding point 129, credit institutions using pooled data according to points 57 and 58 may outsource the following tasks: Repealed
- Internal Audit Repealed
- 131Division 131 Repealed
- Annex VIII: CREDIT RISK MITIGATION Repealed
- Part 1: Eligibility Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- 2For the purposes of this Annex: Repealed
- FUNDED CREDIT PROTECTION Repealed
- On-balance sheet netting Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- Master netting agreements covering repurchase transactions and/or securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions and/or other capital market-driven transactions Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- Collateral Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- Eligibility under all approaches and methods Repealed
- 7The following financial items may be recognised as eligible collateral under all approaches and methods: Repealed
- 8Debt securities issued by institutions which securities do not have a credit assessment by an eligible ECAI may be recognised as eligible collateral if they fulfil the following criteria: Repealed
- 9Units in collective investment undertakings may be recognised as eligible collateral if the following conditions are satisfied: Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- Additional eligibility under the Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method Repealed
- 11In addition to the collateral set out in points 7 to 10, where a credit institution uses the Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method under Part 3, the following financial items may be recognised as eligible collateral: Repealed
- Additional eligibility for calculations under Articles 84 to 89 Repealed
- 12Division 12 Repealed
- Real estate collateral Repealed
- 13Residential real estate property which is or will be occupied or let by the owner, or the beneficial owner in the case of personal investment companies, and commercial real estate property, that is, offices and other commercial premises, may be recognised as eligible collateral where the following conditions are met: Repealed
- 14Division 14 Repealed
- 15Division 15 Repealed
- 16Division 16 Repealed
- 17The competent authorities of the Member States may waive the requirement for their credit institutions to comply with the condition in point 13(b) for commercial real estate property situated within the territory of that Member State, if the competent authorities have evidence that the relevant market is well-developed and long-established and that loss-rates stemming from lending secured by commercial real estate property satisfy the following conditions: Repealed
- 18Division 18 Repealed
- 19Division 19 Repealed
- Receivables Repealed
- 20Division 20 Repealed
- Other physical collateral Repealed
- 21The competent authorities may recognise as eligible collateral physical items of a type other than those types indicated in points 13 to 19 if satisfied as to the following: Repealed
- Leasing Repealed
- 22Division 22 Repealed
- Other funded credit protection Repealed
- Cash on deposit with, or cash assimilated instruments held by, a third party institution. Repealed
- 23Division 23 Repealed
- Life insurance policies pledged to the lending credit institution Repealed
- 24Division 24 Repealed
- Institution instruments repurchased on request Repealed
- 25Division 25 Repealed
- UNFUNDED CREDIT PROTECTION Repealed
- Eligibility of protection providers under all approaches Repealed
- 26The following parties may be recognised as eligible providers of unfunded credit protection: Repealed
- 27Division 27 Repealed
- 28Division 28 Repealed
- Eligibility of protection providers under the IRB Approach which qualify for the treatment set out in Annex VII, Part 1, point 4. Repealed
- 29Institutions, insurance and reinsurance undertakings and export credit agencies which fulfil the following conditions may be recognised as eligible providers of unfunded credit protection which qualify for the treatment set out in Annex VII, Part 1, point 4: Repealed
- TYPES OF CREDIT DERIVATIVES Repealed
- 30The following types of credit derivatives, and instruments that may be composed of such credit derivatives or that are economically effectively similar, may be recognised as eligible: Repealed
- 31Division 31 Repealed
- Internal hedges Repealed
- 32Division 32 Repealed
- Part 2: Minimum Requirements Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- FUNDED CREDIT PROTECTION Repealed
- On-balance sheet netting agreements (other than master netting agreements covering repurchase transactions, securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions and/or other capital market-driven transactions). Repealed
- 3For on-balance sheet netting agreements — other than master netting agreements covering repurchase transactions, securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions and/or other capital market-driven transactions — to be recognised for the purposes of Articles 90 to 93, the following conditions shall be satisfied: Repealed
- Master netting agreements covering repurchase transactions and/or securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions and/or other capital market driven transactions Repealed
- 4For master netting agreements covering repurchase transactions and/or securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions and/or other capital market driven transactions to be recognised for the purposes of Articles 90 to 93, they shall: Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- Financial collateral Repealed
- Minimum requirements for the recognition of financial collateral under all Approaches and Methods Repealed
- 6For the recognition of financial collateral and gold, the following conditions shall be met. Repealed
- Additional minimum requirements for the recognition of financial collateral under the Financial Collateral Simple Method Repealed
- 7Division 7 Repealed
- Minimum requirements for the recognition of real estate collateral Repealed
- 8For the recognition of real estate collateral the following conditions shall be met. Repealed
- Minimum requirements for the recognition of receivables as collateral Repealed
- 9For the recognition of receivables as collateral the following conditions shall be met: Repealed
- Minimum requirements for the recognition of other physical collateral Repealed
- 10For the recognition of other physical collateral the following conditions shall be met: Repealed
- Minimum requirements for treating lease exposures as collateralised Repealed
- 11For the exposures arising from leasing transactions to be treated as collateralised by the type of property leased, the following conditions shall be met: Repealed
- Minimum requirements for the recognition of other funded credit protection Repealed
- Cash on deposit with, or cash assimilated instruments held by, a third party institution Repealed
- 12To be eligible for the treatment set out at Part 3, point 79, the protection referred to in Part 1, point 23 must satisfy the following conditions: Repealed
- Life insurance policies pledged to the lending credit institution. Repealed
- 13For life insurance policies pledged to the lending credit institution to be recognised, all the following conditions shall be met: Repealed
- UNFUNDED CREDIT PROTECTION AND CREDIT LINKED NOTES Repealed
- Requirements common to guarantees and credit derivatives Repealed
- 14Subject to point 16, for the credit protection deriving from a guarantee or credit derivative to be recognised the following conditions shall be met: Repealed
- Operational requirements Repealed
- 15Division 15 Repealed
- Sovereign and other public sector counter-guarantees Repealed
- 16Where an exposure is protected by a guarantee which is counter-guaranteed by a central government or central bank, a regional government or local authority, a public sector entity, claims on which are treated as claims on the central government in whose jurisdiction they are established under Articles 78 to 83, a multi-lateral development bank or an international organisation, to which a 0 % risk weight is assigned under or by virtue of Articles 78 to 83, or a public sector entity, claims on which are treated as claims on credit institutions under Articles 78 to 83, the exposure may be treated as protected by a guarantee provided by the entity in question, provided the following conditions are satisfied: Repealed
- 17Division 17 Repealed
- Additional requirements for guarantees Repealed
- 18For a guarantee to be recognised the following conditions shall also be met: Repealed
- 19In the case of guarantees provided in the context of mutual guarantee schemes recognised for these purposes by the competent authorities or provided by or counter-guaranteed by entities referred to in point 16, the requirements in point 18(a) shall be considered to be satisfied where either of the following conditions are met: Repealed
- Additional requirements for credit derivatives Repealed
- 20For a credit derivative to be recognised the following conditions shall also be met: Repealed
- 21A mismatch between the underlying obligation and the reference obligation under the credit derivative (i.e. the obligation used for the purposes of determining cash settlement value or the deliverable obligation) or between the underlying obligation and the obligation used for purposes of determining whether a credit event has occurred is permissible only if the following conditions are met: Repealed
- Requirements to qualify for the treatment set out in Annex VII, Part 1, point 4 Repealed
- 22To be eligible for the treatment set out in Annex VII, Part 1, point 4, credit protection deriving from a guarantee or credit derivative shall meet the following conditions: Repealed
- Part 3: Calculating the effects of credit risk mitigation Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- FUNDED CREDIT PROTECTION Repealed
- Credit linked notes Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- On-balance sheet netting Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- Master netting agreements covering repurchase transactions and/or securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions and/or other capital market-driven transactions Repealed
- Calculation of the fully-adjusted exposure value Repealed
- Using the ‘Supervisory’ volatility adjustments or the ‘Own Estimates’ volatility adjustments approaches Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- 7Division 7 Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- 9Division 9 Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- 11E* shall be calculated according to the following formula: Repealed
- Using the Internal Models approach Repealed
- 12Division 12 Repealed
- 13Division 13 Repealed
- 14Division 14 Repealed
- 15Division 15 Repealed
- 16Recognition shall only be given if the competent authority is satisfied that the credit institution's risk-management system for managing the risks arising on the transactions covered by the master netting agreement is conceptually sound and implemented with integrity and that, in particular, the following qualitative standards are met: Repealed
- 17The calculation of the potential change in value shall be subject to the following minimum standards: Repealed
- 18Division 18 Repealed
- 19Division 19 Repealed
- 20The fully adjusted exposure value (E*) for credit institutions using the Internal models approach shall be calculated according to the following formula: Repealed
- 21Division 21 Repealed
- 1.3.2Calculating risk-weighted exposure amounts and expected loss amounts for repurchase transactions and/or securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions and/or other capital market-driven transactions covered by master netting agreements Repealed
- 22E* as calculated under points 5 to 21 shall be taken as the exposure value of the exposure to the counterparty arising from the transactions subject to the master netting agreement for the purposes of Article 80. Repealed
- 23Division 23 Repealed
- Financial collateral Repealed
- Financial Collateral Simple Method Repealed
- 24The Financial Collateral Simple Method shall be available only where risk-weighted exposure amounts are calculated under Articles 78 to 83. A credit institution shall not use both the Financial Collateral Simple Method and the Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method, unless for the purposes of Articles 85(1) and 89(1). Credit institutions shall demonstrate to the competent authorities that this exceptional application of both methods is not used selectively with the purpose of achieving reduced minimum capital requirements and does not lead to regulatory arbitrage. Repealed
- 25Under this method, recognised financial collateral is assigned a value equal to its market value as determined in accordance with Part 2, point 6. Repealed
- 26The risk weight that would be assigned under Articles 78 to 83 if the lender had a direct exposure to the collateral instrument shall be assigned to those portions of exposure values collateralised by the market value of recognised collateral. For this purpose, the exposure value of an off-balance sheet item listed in Annex II shall be 100 % of its value rather than the exposure value indicated in Article 78(1). The risk weight of the collateralised portion shall be a minimum of 20 % except as specified in points 27 to 29. The remainder of the exposure value shall receive the risk weight that would be assigned to an unsecured exposure to the counterparty under Articles 78 to 83. Repealed
- 27A risk weight of 0 % shall be assigned to the collateralised portion of the exposure arising from transactions which fulfil the criteria enumerated in points 58 and 59. If the counterparty to the transaction is not a core market participant a risk weight of 10 % shall be assigned. Repealed
- 28A risk weight of 0 % shall, to the extent of the collateralisation, be assigned to the exposure values determined under Annex III for the derivative instruments listed in Annex IV and subject to daily marking-to-market, collateralised by cash or cash-assimilated instruments where there is no currency mismatch. A risk weight of 10 % shall be assigned to the extent of the collateralisation to the exposure values of such transactions collateralised by debt securities issued by central governments or central banks which are assigned a 0 % risk weight under Articles 78 to 83. Repealed
- 29A 0 % risk weight may be assigned where the exposure and the collateral are denominated in the same currency, and either: Repealed
- Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method Repealed
- 30Division 30 Repealed
- 31Division 31 Repealed
- 32Division 32 Repealed
- Calculating adjusted values Repealed
- 33The volatility-adjusted value of the collateral to be taken into account is calculated as follows in the case of all transactions except those transactions subject to recognised master netting agreements to which the provisions set out in points 5 to 23 are applied: Repealed
- Calculation of volatility adjustments to be applied Repealed
- 34Division 34 Repealed
- 35A credit institution may choose to use the Supervisory volatility adjustments approach or the Own estimates approach independently of the choice it has made between the Articles 78 to 83 and Articles 84 to 89 for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts. However, if credit institutions seek to use the Own estimates approach, they must do so for the full range of instrument types, excluding immaterial portfolios where they may use the Supervisory volatility adjustments approach. Repealed
- Supervisory volatility adjustments Repealed
- The volatility adjustments to be applied under the Supervisory volatility adjustments approach (assuming daily revaluation) shall be those set out in Tables 1 to 4. Repealed
- VOLATILITY ADJUSTMENTS Repealed
- 37Division 37 Repealed
- 38Division 38 Repealed
- 39Division 39 Repealed
- 40Division 40 Repealed
- 41Division 41 Repealed
- (ii)Own estimates of volatility adjustments Repealed
- 42Division 42 Repealed
- 43Division 43 Repealed
- 44Division 44 Repealed
- 45Division 45 Repealed
- 46Division 46 Repealed
- 47Division 47 Repealed
- 48Division 48 Repealed
- 49Credit institutions may use volatility adjustment numbers calculated according to shorter or longer liquidation periods, scaled up or down to the liquidation period set out in point 48 for the type of transaction in question, using the square root of time formula: Repealed
- 50Division 50 Repealed
- 51Division 51 Repealed
- 52Division 52 Repealed
- 53Division 53 Repealed
- 54Division 54 Repealed
- 55Division 55 Repealed
- 56An independent review of the credit institution's system for the estimation of volatility adjustments shall be carried out regularly in the credit institution's own internal auditing process. A review of the overall system for the estimation of volatility adjustments and for integration of those adjustments into the credit institution's risk management process shall take place at least once a year and shall specifically address, at a minimum: Repealed
- Scaling up of volatility adjustments Repealed
- 57The volatility adjustments set out in points 36 to 41 are the volatility adjustments to be applied where there is daily revaluation. Similarly, where a credit institution uses its own estimates of the volatility adjustments in accordance with points 42 to 56, these must be calculated in the first instance on the basis of daily revaluation. If the frequency of revaluation is less than daily, larger volatility adjustments shall be applied. These shall be calculated by scaling up the daily revaluation volatility adjustments, using the following ‘square root of time’ formula: Repealed
- Conditions for applying a 0 % volatility adjustment Repealed
- 58In relation to repurchase transactions and securities lending or borrowing transactions, where a credit institution uses the Supervisory Volatility Adjustments Approach or the Own Estimates Approach and where the conditions set out in points (a) to (h) are satisfied, credit institutions may, instead of applying the volatility adjustments calculated under points 34 to 57, apply a 0 % volatility adjustment. This option is not available in respect of credit institutions using the internal models approach set out in points 12 to 21: Repealed
- 59Division 59 Repealed
- (c)Calculating risk-weighted exposure amounts and expected loss amounts Repealed
- 60E* as calculated under point 33 shall be taken as the exposure value for the purposes of Article 80. In the case of off-balance sheet items listed in Annex II, E* shall be taken as the value at which the percentages indicated in Article 78(1) shall be applied to arrive at the exposure value. Repealed
- 61LGD* (the effective LGD)calculated as set out in this point shall be taken as the LGD for the purposes of Annex VII. Repealed
- Other eligible collateral for Articles 84 to 89 Repealed
- Valuation Repealed
- Real estate collateral Repealed
- 62Division 62 Repealed
- 63Division 63 Repealed
- 64Division 64 Repealed
- 65Division 65 Repealed
- Receivables Repealed
- 66Division 66 Repealed
- Other physical collateral Repealed
- 67Division 67 Repealed
- Calculating risk-weighted exposure amounts and expected loss amounts Repealed
- General treatment Repealed
- 68Division 68 Repealed
- 69Division 69 Repealed
- 70Division 70 Repealed
- 71Division 71 Repealed
- 72Table 5 sets out the applicable LGD* and required collateralisation levels for the secured parts of exposures. Repealed
- Alternative treatment for real estate collateral Repealed
- 73Subject to the requirements of this point and point 74 and as an alternative to the treatment in points 68 to 72, the competent authorities of a Member State may authorise credit institutions to assign a 50 % risk weight to the Part of the exposure fully collateralised by residential real estate property or commercial real estate property situated within the territory of the Member State if they have evidence that the relevant markets are well-developed and long-established with loss-rates from lending collateralised by residential real estate property or commercial real estate property respectively that do not exceed the following limits: Repealed
- 74Division 74 Repealed
- 75Division 75 Repealed
- Calculating risk-weighted exposure amounts and expected loss amounts in the case of mixed pools of collateral Repealed
- 76Division 76 Repealed
- 77Division 77 Repealed
- 78Division 78 Repealed
- Other funded credit protection Repealed
- Deposits with third party institutions Repealed
- 79Division 79 Repealed
- Life insurance policies pledged to the lending credit institution Repealed
- 80Where the conditions set out in Part 2, point 13 are satisfied, the portion of the exposure collateralised by the current surrender value of credit protection falling within the terms of Part 1, point 24 shall be either of the following: Repealed
- 80aFor purposes of point 80(a), the following risk weights shall be assigned on the basis of the risk weight assigned to a senior unsecured exposure to the company providing the life insurance: Repealed
- Institution instruments repurchased on request Repealed
- 81Division 81 Repealed
- 82The value of the credit protection recognised shall be the following: Repealed
- UNFUNDED CREDIT PROTECTION Repealed
- Valuation Repealed
- 83The value of unfunded credit protection (G) shall be the amount that the protection provider has undertaken to pay in the event of the default or non-payment of the borrower or on the occurrence of other specified credit events. In the case of credit derivatives which do not include as a credit event restructuring of the underlying obligation involving forgiveness or postponement of principal, interest or fees that result in a credit loss event (e.g. value adjustment, the making of a value adjustment or other similar debit to the profit and loss account), Repealed
- 84Where unfunded credit protection is denominated in a currency different from that in which the exposure is denominated (a currency mismatch) the value of the credit protection shall be reduced by the application of a volatility adjustment HFX as follows: Repealed
- 85Division 85 Repealed
- Calculating risk-weighted exposure amounts and expected loss amounts Repealed
- Partial protection — tranching Repealed
- 86Division 86 Repealed
- Standardised Approach Repealed
- Full protection Repealed
- 87For the purposes of Article 80, g shall be the risk weight to be assigned to an exposure, the exposure value (E) of which is fully protected by unfunded protection (GA), where: Repealed
- Partial protection — equal seniority Repealed
- 88Where the protected amount is less than the exposure value and the protected and unprotected parts are of equal seniority — i.e. the credit institution and the protection provider share losses on a pro-rata basis, proportional regulatory capital relief shall be afforded. For the purposes of Article 80, risk-weighted exposure amounts shall be calculated in accordance with the following formula: Repealed
- Sovereign guarantees Repealed
- 89Division 89 Repealed
- 2.2.3IRB Approach Repealed
- 90Division 90 Repealed
- 91Division 91 Repealed
- 92Division 92 Repealed
- Part 4: Maturity Mismatches Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- 2Where there is a maturity mismatch the credit protection shall not be recognised where: Repealed
- DEFINITION OF MATURITY Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- VALUATION OF PROTECTION Repealed
- Transactions subject to funded credit protection — Financial Collateral Simple Method Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- Transactions subject to funded credit protection — Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method Repealed
- 7The maturity of the credit protection and that of the exposure must be reflected in the adjusted value of the collateral according to the following formula: Repealed
- Transactions subject to unfunded credit protection Repealed
- 8The maturity of the credit protection and that of the exposure must be reflected in the adjusted value of the credit protection according to the following formula Repealed
- Part 5: Combinations of credit risk mitigation in the Standardised Approach Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- Part 6: Basket CRM techniques Repealed
- FIRST-TO-DEFAULT CREDIT DERIVATIVES Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- N NTH-TO-DEFAULT CREDIT DERIVATIVES Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- Annex IX: SECURITISATION Repealed
- Part 1: Definitions for the purposes of Annex IX Repealed
- 1For the purposes of this Annex: Repealed
- Part 2: Minimum requirements for recognition of significant credit risk transfer and calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts and expected loss amounts for securitised exposures Repealed
- MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR RECOGNITION OF SIGNIFICANT CREDIT RISK TRANSFER IN A TRADITIONAL SECURITISATION Repealed
- 1The originator credit institution of a traditional securitisation may exclude securitised exposures from the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts and expected loss amounts if either of the following conditions is fulfilled: Repealed
- 1aUnless the competent authority decides in a specific instance that the possible reduction in risk weighted exposure amounts which the originator credit institution would achieve by this securitisation is not justified by a commensurate transfer of credit risk to third parties, significant credit risk shall be considered to have been transferred in the following cases: Repealed
- 1bFor the purposes of point 1a, mezzanine securitisation positions mean securitisation positions to which a risk weight lower than 1 250 % applies and that are more junior than the most senior position in this securitisation and more junior than any securitisation position in this securitisation to which: Repealed
- 1cDivision 1c Repealed
- 1dIn addition to points 1 to 1c, all the following conditions shall be met: Repealed
- MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR RECOGNITION OF SIGNIFICANT CREDIT RISK TRANSFER IN A SYNTHETIC SECURITISATION Repealed
- 2An originator credit institution of a synthetic securitisation may calculate risk-weighted exposure amounts, and, as relevant, expected loss amounts, for the securitised exposures in accordance with points 3 and 4, if either of the following is met: Repealed
- 2aUnless the competent authority decides on a case- by-case basis that the possible reduction in risk weighted exposure amounts which the originator credit institution would achieve by this securitisation is not justified by a commensurate transfer of credit risk to third parties, significant credit risk shall be considered to have been transferred if either of the following conditions is met: Repealed
- 2bFor the purposes of point 2a, mezzanine securitisation positions means securitisation positions to which a risk weight lower than 1 250 % applies and that are more junior than the most senior position in this securitisation and more junior than any securitisation positions in this securitisation to which: Repealed
- 2cDivision 2c Repealed
- 2dIn addition, the transfer shall comply with the following conditions: Repealed
- ORIGINATOR CREDIT INSTITUTIONS' CALCULATION OF RISK-WEIGHTED EXPOSURE AMOUNTS FOR EXPOSURES SECURITISED IN A SYNTHETIC SECURITISATION Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- Treatment of maturity mismatches in synthetic securitisations Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- 7An originator credit institution shall ignore any maturity mismatch in calculating risk-weighted exposure amounts for tranches appearing pursuant to Part 4 with a risk weighting of 1 250 %. For all other tranches, the maturity mismatch treatment set out in Annex VIII shall be applied in accordance with the following formula: Repealed
- Part 3: External credit assessments Repealed
- REQUIREMENTS TO BE MET BY THE CREDIT ASSESSMENTS OF ECAIS Repealed
- 1To be used for the purposes of calculating risk-weighted exposure amounts under Part 4, a credit assessment of an eligible ECAI shall comply with the following conditions. Repealed
- USE OF CREDIT ASSESSMENTS Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- 7Division 7 Repealed
- 7aDivision 7a Repealed
- MAPPING Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- 9Division 9 Repealed
- Part 4: Calculation Repealed
- CALCULATION OF RISK-WEIGHTED EXPOSURE AMOUNTS Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- 2Subject to point 3: Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- 5Where a credit institution has two or more overlapping positions in a securitisation, it will be required to the extent that they overlap to include in its calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts only the position or portion of a position producing the higher risk-weighted exposure amounts. The credit institution may also recognise such overlap between specific risk capital charges for positions in the trading book and capital charges for positions in the banking book, provided that the credit institution is able to calculate and compare the capital charges for the relevant positions. For the purpose of this point ‘overlapping’ occurs when the positions, wholly or partially, represent an exposure to the same risk such that the extent of the overlap there is a single exposure. Repealed
- CALCULATION OF RISK-WEIGHTED EXPOSURE AMOUNTS UNDER THE STANDARDISED APPROACH Repealed
- 6Subject to point 8, the risk-weighted exposure amount of a rated securitisation or re-securitisation position shall be calculated by applying to the exposure value the risk weight associated with the credit quality step with which the credit assessment has been determined to be associated by the competent authorities in accordance with Article 98 as laid down in Table 1. Repealed
- 7Division 7 Repealed
- Originator and sponsor credit institutions Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- Treatment of unrated positions Repealed
- 9Division 9 Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- Treatment of securitisation positions in a second loss tranche or better in an ABCP programme Repealed
- 11Division 11 Repealed
- 12For the treatment set out in point 11 to be available, the securitisation position shall be: Repealed
- Treatment of unrated liquidity facilities Repealed
- Eligible liquidity facilities Repealed
- 13When the following conditions are met, to determine its exposure value a conversion figure of 50 % may be applied to the nominal amount of a liquidity facility: Repealed
- Liquidity facilities that may be drawn only in the event of a general market disruption Repealed
- 14Division 14 Repealed
- Cash advance facilities Repealed
- 15Division 15 Repealed
- Additional capital requirements for securitisations of revolving exposures with early amortisation provisions Repealed
- 16Division 16 Repealed
- 17Division 17 Repealed
- 18Division 18 Repealed
- 19For the purposes of point 16 to 31, ‘originator's interest’ means the exposure value of that notional Part of a pool of drawn amounts sold into a securitisation, the proportion of which in relation to the amount of the total pool sold into the structure determines the proportion of the cash flows generated by principal and interest collections and other associated amounts which are not available to make payments to those having securitisation positions in the securitisation. Repealed
- 20Division 20 Repealed
- Exemptions from early amortisation treatment Repealed
- 21Originators of the following types of securitisation are exempt from the capital requirement in point 16: Repealed
- Maximum capital requirement Repealed
- 22For an originator credit institution subject to the capital requirement in point 16 the total of the risk-weighted exposure amounts in respect of its positions in the investors' interest and the risk-weighted exposure amounts calculated under point 16 shall be no greater than the greater of: Repealed
- 23Division 23 Repealed
- Calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts Repealed
- 24Division 24 Repealed
- 25An early amortisation provision shall be considered to be ‘controlled’ where the following conditions are met: Repealed
- 26Division 26 Repealed
- 27Division 27 Repealed
- 28The conversion figure to be applied shall be determined by the level of the actual three month average excess spread in accordance with Table 3. Repealed
- 29Division 29 Repealed
- 30Division 30 Repealed
- 31Division 31 Repealed
- 32Division 32 Repealed
- 33Division 33 Repealed
- Recognition of credit risk mitigation on securitisation positions Repealed
- 34Division 34 Repealed
- Reduction in risk-weighted exposure amounts Repealed
- 35Division 35 Repealed
- 36Division 36 Repealed
- CALCULATION OF RISK-WEIGHTED EXPOSURE AMOUNTS UNDER THE INTERNAL RATINGS BASED APPROACH Repealed
- Hierarchy of methods Repealed
- 37Division 37 Repealed
- 38Division 38 Repealed
- 39Division 39 Repealed
- 40Division 40 Repealed
- 41Division 41 Repealed
- Use of inferred ratings Repealed
- 42When the following minimum operational requirements are satisfied, an institution shall attribute to an unrated position an inferred credit assessment equivalent to the credit assessment of those rated positions (the ‘reference positions’) which are the most senior positions which are in all respects subordinate to the unrated securitisation position in question: Repealed
- The ‘Internal Assessment Approach’ for positions in ABCP programmes Repealed
- 43Subject to the approval of the competent authorities, when the following conditions are satisfied a credit institution may attribute to an unrated position in an ABCP programme a derived rating as laid down in point 44: Repealed
- 44Division 44 Repealed
- Maximum risk-weighted exposure amounts Repealed
- 45Division 45 Repealed
- Ratings Based Method Repealed
- 46Under the Ratings Based Method, the risk-weighted exposure amount of a rated securitisation or re-securitisation position shall be calculated by applying to the exposure value the risk weight associated with the credit quality step with which the credit assessment has been determined to be associated by the competent authorities in accordance with Article 98, as set out in the Table 4, multiplied by 1,06. Repealed
- 47Division 47 Repealed
- 48A risk weight of 6 % may be applied to a position in the most senior tranche of a securitisation where that tranche is senior in all respects to another tranche of the securitisation positions which would receive a risk weight of 7 % under point 46, provided that: Repealed
- 49In calculating the effective number of exposures securitised multiple exposures to one obligor shall be treated as one exposure. The effective number of exposures is calculated as: Repealed
- 50Division 50 Repealed
- 51Division 51 Repealed
- Supervisory Formula Method Repealed
- 52Division 52 Repealed
- 53Subject to points 58 and 59, the risk weight to be applied to the exposure amount shall be: Repealed
- 54Division 54 Repealed
- Liquidity Facilities Repealed
- 55Division 55 Repealed
- Liquidity Facilities Only Available in the Event of General Market Disruption Repealed
- 56Division 56 Repealed
- Cash advance facilities Repealed
- 57Division 57 Repealed
- Exceptional treatment where Kirb cannot be calculated. Repealed
- 58Division 58 Repealed
- 59Division 59 Repealed
- Recognition of credit risk mitigation in respect of securitisation positions Repealed
- Funded credit protection Repealed
- 60Division 60 Repealed
- Unfunded credit protection Repealed
- 61Division 61 Repealed
- Calculation of capital requirements for securitisation positions with credit risk mitigation Repealed
- Ratings Based Method Repealed
- 62Division 62 Repealed
- Supervisory Formula Method — full credit protection Repealed
- 63Division 63 Repealed
- 64Division 64 Repealed
- 65Division 65 Repealed
- Supervisory formula method — partial protection Repealed
- 66Division 66 Repealed
- 67Division 67 Repealed
- Additional capital requirements for securitisations of revolving exposures with early amortisation provisions Repealed
- 68Division 68 Repealed
- 69Division 69 Repealed
- 70For the purposes of these provisions, ‘originators interest’ shall be the sum of: Repealed
- 71Division 71 Repealed
- Reduction in risk-weighted exposure amounts Repealed
- 72Division 72 Repealed
- 73Division 73 Repealed
- 74Division 74 Repealed
- 75For the purposes of point 74: Repealed
- 76Division 76 Repealed
- Annex X: OPERATIONAL RISK Repealed
- Part 1: Basic Indicator Approach Repealed
- CAPITAL REQUIREMENT Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- RELEVANT INDICATOR Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- Credit institutions subject to Directive 86/635/EEC Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- 6These elements may need to be adjusted to reflect the qualifications in points 7 and 8. Repealed
- Qualifications Repealed
- 7Division 7 Repealed
- 8The following elements shall not be used in the calculation of the relevant indicator: Repealed
- Credit institutions subject to a different accounting framework Repealed
- 9Division 9 Repealed
- Part 2: Standardised Approach Repealed
- CAPITAL REQUIREMENT Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- 2The three-year average is calculated on the basis of the last three twelve-monthly observations at the end of the financial year. When audited figures are not available, business estimates may be used. Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- PRINCIPLES FOR BUSINESS LINE MAPPING Repealed
- 4Credit institutions must develop and document specific policies and criteria for mapping the relevant indicator for current business lines and activities into the standardised framework. The criteria must be reviewed and adjusted as appropriate for new or changing business activities and risks. The principles for business line mapping are: Repealed
- ALTERNATIVE INDICATORS FOR CERTAIN BUSINESS LINES Repealed
- Modalities Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- 7Division 7 Repealed
- Conditions Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- General condition Repealed
- 9Division 9 Repealed
- Conditions specific to retail banking and commercial banking Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- 11Division 11 Repealed
- QUALIFYING CRITERIA Repealed
- 12Credit institutions must meet the qualifying criteria listed below, in addition to the general risk management standards set out in Article 22 and Annex V. Satisfaction of these criteria shall be determined having regard to the size and scale of activities of the credit institution and to the principle of proportionality. Repealed
- Part 3: Advanced Measurement Approaches Repealed
- QUALIFYING CRITERIA Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- Qualitative Standards Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- 7The validation of the operational risk measurement system by the competent authorities shall include the following elements: Repealed
- Quantitative Standards Repealed
- Process Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- 9Division 9 Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- 11Division 11 Repealed
- 12Division 12 Repealed
- Internal data Repealed
- 13Division 13 Repealed
- 14Division 14 Repealed
- 15Division 15 Repealed
- 16Division 16 Repealed
- 17Division 17 Repealed
- 18Division 18 Repealed
- External data Repealed
- 19Division 19 Repealed
- Scenario analysis Repealed
- 20Division 20 Repealed
- Business environment and internal control factors Repealed
- 21Division 21 Repealed
- 22Division 22 Repealed
- 23Division 23 Repealed
- 24Division 24 Repealed
- IMPACT OF INSURANCE AND OTHER RISK TRANSFER MECHANISMS Repealed
- 25Division 25 Repealed
- 26Division 26 Repealed
- 27The insurance and the credit institutions' insurance framework shall meet the following conditions: Repealed
- 28The methodology for recognising insurance shall capture the following elements through discounts or haircuts in the amount of insurance recognition: Repealed
- 29Division 29 Repealed
- APPLICATION TO USE AN ADVANCED MEASUREMENT APPROACH ON A GROUP-WIDE BASIS Repealed
- 30Division 30 Repealed
- 31Division 31 Repealed
- Part 4: Combined use of different methodologies Repealed
- USE OF AN ADVANCED MEASUREMENT APPROACH IN COMBINATION WITH OTHER APPROACHES Repealed
- 1A credit institution may use an Advanced Measurement Approach in combination with either the Basic Indicator Approach or the Standardised Approach, subject to the following conditions: Repealed
- 2On a case-by case basis, the competent authority may impose the following additional conditions: Repealed
- COMBINED USE OF THE BASIC INDICATOR APPROACH AND OF THE STANDARDISED APPROACH Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- 5Loss event type classification Repealed
- Annex XI: TECHNICAL CRITERIA ON REVIEW AND EVALUATION BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITIES Repealed
- 1In addition to credit, market and operational risks, the review and evaluation performed by competent authorities pursuant to Article 124 shall include the following: Repealed
- 1aDivision 1a Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- Annex XII: TECHNICAL CRITERIA ON TRANSPARENCY AND DISCLOSURE Repealed
- Part 1: General criteria Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- Part 2: General requirements Repealed
- 1The risk management objectives and policies of the credit institution shall be disclosed for each separate category of risk, including the risks referred to under points 1 to 14. These disclosures shall include: Repealed
- 2The following information shall be disclosed regarding the scope of application of the requirements of this Directive: Repealed
- 3The following information shall be disclosed by the credit institutions regarding their own funds: Repealed
- 4The following information shall be disclosed regarding the compliance by the credit institution with the requirements laid down in Articles 75 and 123: Repealed
- 5The following information shall be disclosed regarding the credit institution's exposure to counterparty credit risk as defined in Annex III, Part 1: Repealed
- 6The following information shall be disclosed regarding the credit institution's exposure to credit risk and dilution risk: Repealed
- 7For credit institutions calculating the risk-weighted exposure amounts in accordance with Articles 78 to 83, the following information shall be disclosed for each of the exposure classes specified in Article 79: Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- 9Division 9 Repealed
- 10The following information shall be disclosed by each credit institution which calculates its capital requirements in accordance with Annex V to Directive 2006/49/EC: Repealed
- 11The following information shall be disclosed by the credit institutions on operational risk: Repealed
- 12The following information shall be disclosed regarding the exposures in equities not included in the trading book: Repealed
- 13The following information shall be disclosed by credit institutions on their exposure to interest rate risk on positions not included in the trading book: Repealed
- 14Credit institutions calculating risk weighted exposure amounts in accordance with Articles 94 to 101 or capital requirements in accordance with point 16a of Annex I to Directive 2006/49/EC shall disclose the following information, where relevant, separately for their trading and non-trading book: Repealed
- 15The following information, including regular, at least annual, updates, shall be disclosed to the public regarding the remuneration policy and practices of the credit institution for those categories of staff whose professional activities have a material impact on its risk profile: Repealed
- Part 3: Qualifying requirements for the use of particular instruments or methodologies Repealed
- 1The credit institutions calculating the risk-weighted exposure amounts in accordance with Articles 84 to 89 shall disclose the following information: Repealed
- 2The credit institutions applying credit risk mitigation techniques shall disclose the following information: Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- Annex XIII Repealed
- ARepealed Directives Together With Their Successive Amendments (referred To In Article 158) Repealed
- Bdeadlines for transposition (referred to in Article 158) Repealed