OpenLegislation

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1445/2005 of 5 September 2005 defining the proper quality evaluation criteria and the contents of the quality reports for waste statistics for the purposes of Regulation (EC) No 2150/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Text with EEA relevance) (revoked)

EU Regulation No 1445/2005 · Adopted 5 September 2005 · Extends to United Kingdom

Original text. legislation.gov.uk does not revise this item, so later amendments are not shown here. Changes made to it are listed under each provision when known.

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1445/2005

of 5 September 2005

defining the proper quality evaluation criteria and the contents of the quality reports for waste statistics for the purposes of Regulation (EC) No 2150/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(Text with EEA relevance) (revoked)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Annotations to the whole text

Textual amendments

F1

Regulation revoked (31.12.2020) by The UK Statistics (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/489), reg. 1, Sch. 1 para. 72; 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)

Contents

  1. 1Article 1 Repealed
  2. 2Article 2 Repealed
  3. Signature
  4. Annex: CONTENTS OF THE QUALITY REPORT AND EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR WASTE STATISTICS Repealed
  5. PREAMBLE TO THE CONTENTS OF THE QUALITY REPORT Repealed
  6. Multi-method environment Repealed
  7. Structure Repealed
  8. Data revision Repealed
  9. Provisional data Repealed
  10. Key aggregates Repealed
  11. File name Repealed
  12. CONTENTS OF THE QUALITY REPORT Repealed
  13. Part I:Description of the data Repealed
  14. Identification Repealed
  15. Contact information on the person(s) responsible for the quality of waste statistics Repealed
  16. Part II:Report on quality attributes Repealed
  17. 1Relevance Repealed
  18. 2Accuracy Repealed
  19. 2.1Sampling errors Repealed
  20. 2.2Non-sampling errors Repealed
  21. 2.2.1Coverage errors Repealed
  22. 2.2.2Measurement errors Repealed
  23. 2.2.3Processing errors Repealed
  24. 2.2.4Non-response errors Repealed
  25. 2.2.5Model assumption errors Repealed
  26. 3Timeliness and punctuality Repealed
  27. 4Accessibility and clarity Repealed
  28. 5Comparability Repealed
  29. 6Coherence Repealed
  30. Environment statistics: Repealed
  31. Socio-economic statistics: Repealed
  32. 7Burden on respondents Repealed
  33. EVALUATION CRITERIA Repealed

1F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Signature

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PREAMBLE TO THE CONTENTS OF THE QUALITY REPORTF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Multi-method environmentF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

StructureF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Data revisionF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Provisional dataF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Key aggregatesF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

File nameF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CONTENTS OF THE QUALITY REPORTF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Part I:Description of the dataF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IdentificationF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Contact information on the person(s) responsible for the quality of waste statisticsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Part II:Report on quality attributesF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1RelevanceF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2AccuracyF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.1Sampling errorsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.2Non-sampling errorsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.2.1Coverage errorsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.2.2Measurement errorsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.2.3Processing errorsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.2.4Non-response errorsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.2.5Model assumption errorsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3Timeliness and punctualityF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4Accessibility and clarityF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5ComparabilityF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6CoherenceF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Environment statistics:F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Socio-economic statistics:F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7Burden on respondentsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

EVALUATION CRITERIAF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .