OpenLegislation

Commission Regulation (EC) No 698/2006 of 5 May 2006 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 530/1999 as regards quality evaluation of structural statistics on labour costs and earnings (Text with EEA relevance) (revoked)

EU Regulation No 698/2006 · Adopted 5 May 2006 · Extends to United Kingdom

Original text. legislation.gov.uk does not revise this item, so later amendments are not shown here. Changes made to it are listed under each provision when known.

Commission Regulation (EC) No 698/2006

of 5 May 2006

implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 530/1999 as regards quality evaluation of structural statistics on labour costs and earnings

(Text with EEA relevance) (revoked)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Annotations to the whole text

Textual amendments

F1

Regulation revoked (31.12.2020) by The UK Statistics (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/489), reg. 1, Sch. 1 para. 87; 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)

Contents

  1. 1Article 1 Repealed
  2. 2Article 2 Repealed
  3. 3Article 3 Repealed
  4. 4Article 4 Repealed
  5. Signature
  6. Annex Content and evaluation criteria of the report on the quality of structural statistics on labour costs and earnings Repealed
  7. 1Relevance Repealed
  8. 2Accuracy Repealed
  9. 2.1Sampling errors Repealed
  10. 2.2Non-sampling errors Repealed
  11. 2.2.1Coverage errors Repealed
  12. 2.2.2Measurement and processing errors Repealed
  13. 2.2.3Non-response errors Repealed
  14. 2.2.4Model assumption errors Repealed
  15. 3Punctuality and timeliness Repealed
  16. 3.1Punctuality Repealed
  17. 3.2Timeliness Repealed
  18. 4Accessibility and clarity Repealed
  19. 4.1Accessibility Repealed
  20. 4.2Clarity Repealed
  21. 5Comparability Repealed
  22. 5.1Geographical comparability Repealed
  23. 5.2Comparability over time Repealed
  24. 6Coherence Repealed

1F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Signature

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Content and evaluation criteria of the report on the quality of structural statistics on labour costs and earningsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1RelevanceF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2AccuracyF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.1Sampling errorsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.2Non-sampling errorsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.2.1Coverage errorsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.2.2Measurement and processing errorsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.2.3Non-response errorsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.2.4Model assumption errorsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3Punctuality and timelinessF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.1PunctualityF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.2TimelinessF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4Accessibility and clarityF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.1AccessibilityF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2ClarityF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5ComparabilityF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.1Geographical comparabilityF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.2Comparability over timeF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6CoherenceF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .