OpenLegislation

Division 4 LITERATURE

United Kingdom

Original text. Later amendments are not shown.

  1. (1)

    OECD TG 201 (2006). Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test.

  2. (2)

    ISO 1998: Water quality — Guidance for algal growth inhibition tests with poorly soluble materials, volatile compounds, metals and waster water. ISO/DIS 14442.

  3. (3)

    OECD 2000: Guidance Document on Aquatic Toxicity Testing of Difficult Substances and mixtures. Environmental Health and Safety Publications. Series on Testing and Assessment, no. 23.

  4. (4)

    ISO 1998: Water quality — Sampling — Part 16: General Guidance for Biotesting. ISO 5667-16.

  5. (5)

    ISO 1993: Water quality — Algal growth inhibition test. ISO 8692.

  6. (6)

    Mayer, P., Cuhel, R. and Nyholm, N. (1997). A simple in vitro fluorescence method for biomass measurements in algal growth inhibition tests. Water Research 31: 2525-2531.

  7. (7)

    Slovacey, R.E. and Hanna, P.J. In vivo fluorescence determinations of phytoplancton chlorophyll, Limnology & Oceanography 22,5 (1977), pp.919-925.

  8. (8)

    Simpson, S.L., Roland, M.G.E., Stauber, J.L. and Batley, G.E. (2003). Effect of declining toxicant concentrations on algal bioassay endpoints. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 22, 2073-2079.

  9. (9)

    Christensen, E.R., Nyholm, N. (1984): Ecotoxicological Assays with Algae: Weibull Dose-Response Curves. Env. Sci. Technol. 19, 713-718.

  10. (10)

    Nyholm, N. Sørensen, P.S., Kusk, K.O. and Christensen, E.R. (1992): Statistical treatment of data from microbial toxicity tests. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 11, 157-167.

  11. (11)

    Bruce, R.D., and Versteeg, D.J. (1992). A statistical procedure for modelling continuous toxicity data. Env. Toxicol. Chem. 11:1485-1494.

  12. (12)

    OECD. (2004). Guidance Document on Statistical Analysis of Ecotoxicity Data.

  13. (13)

    Norberg-King T.J. (1988). An interpolation estimate for chronic toxicity: The ICp approach. National Effluent Toxicity Assessment Center Technical Report 05-88. USEPA, Duluth, MN.

  14. (14)

    Dunnett, C.W. (1955). A multiple comparisons procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 50: 1096-1121

  15. (15)

    Dunnett, C.W. (1964). New tables for multiple comparisons with a control. Biometrics 20: 482-491.

  16. (16)

    Williams, D.A. (1971). A test for differences between treatment means when several dose levels are compared with a zero dose control. Biometrics 27: 103-117.

  17. (17)

    Williams, D.A. (1972). The comparison of several dose levels with a zero dose control. Biometrics 28: 510-531.

  18. (18)

    Draper, N.R. and Smith, H. (1981). Applied Regression Analysis, second edition. Wiley, New York.

  19. (19)

    Brain P. and Cousens R. (1989). An equation to describe dose-responses where there is stimulation of growth at low doses. Weed Research, 29, 93-96.