OpenLegislation

Commission Regulation (EU) No 823/2010 of 17 September 2010 implementing Regulation (EC) No 452/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the production and development of statistics on education and lifelong learning, as regards statistics on the participation of adults in lifelong learning (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

EU Regulation No 823/2010 · Adopted 17 September 2010 · Extends to United Kingdom

Original text. legislation.gov.uk does not revise this item, so later amendments are not shown here. Changes made to it are listed under each provision when known.

Commission Regulation (EU) No 823/2010

of 17 September 2010

implementing Regulation (EC) No 452/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the production and development of statistics on education and lifelong learning, as regards statistics on the participation of adults in lifelong learning

(Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Annotations to the whole text

Textual amendments

F1

Repealed by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1175/2014 of 30 October 2014 implementing Regulation (EC) No 452/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the production and development of statistics on education and lifelong learning, as regards statistics on the participation of adults in lifelong learning and repealing Commission Regulation (EU) No 823/2010 (Text with EEA relevance).

Contents

  1. 1Article 1 Repealed
  2. 2Article 2 Repealed
  3. 3Article 3 Repealed
  4. 4Article 4 Repealed
  5. 5Article 5 Repealed
  6. 6Article 6 Repealed
  7. 7Article 7 Repealed
  8. 8Article 8 Repealed
  9. 9Article 9 Repealed
  10. Signature
  11. Annex IAnnex I Repealed
  12. Annex II: Sample and precision requirements Repealed
  13. 1Division 1 Repealed
  14. 2Division 2 Repealed
  15. 3The indicators of interest and the maximum half-length of the 95 % confidence interval are: Repealed
  16. 4Division 4 Repealed
  17. Annex IIIQuality requirements and quality reporting Repealed
  18. 1RELEVANCE Repealed
  19. ACCURACY Repealed
  20. 2.1Sampling errors Repealed
  21. Non-sampling errors Repealed
  22. 2.2.1Coverage errors Repealed
  23. 2.2.2Measurement errors Repealed
  24. 2.2.3Processing errors Repealed
  25. 2.2.4Non-response errors Repealed
  26. 3TIMELINESS AND PUNCTUALITY Repealed
  27. 4ACCESSIBILITY AND CLARITY Repealed
  28. 5COMPARABILITY Repealed
  29. 6COHERENCE Repealed
  30. 7COST AND BURDEN Repealed

1F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Signature

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Annex IF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3The indicators of interest and the maximum half-length of the 95 % confidence interval are:F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4F1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Annex IIIQuality requirements and quality reportingF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1RELEVANCEF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.1Sampling errorsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.2.1Coverage errorsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.2.2Measurement errorsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.2.3Processing errorsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.2.4Non-response errorsF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3TIMELINESS AND PUNCTUALITYF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4ACCESSIBILITY AND CLARITYF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5COMPARABILITYF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6COHERENCEF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7COST AND BURDENF1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .