Commission Regulation (EU) No 1255/2012 of 11 December 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards International Accounting Standard 12, International Financial Reporting Standards 1 and 13, and Interpretation 20 of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (Text with EEA relevance) (revoked)
EU Regulation No 1255/2012 · Adopted 11 December 2012 · Extends to United Kingdom
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1255/2012
of 11 December 2012
amending Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards International Accounting Standard 12, International Financial Reporting Standards 1 and 13, and Interpretation 20 of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee
(Text with EEA relevance) (revoked)
F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Annotations to the whole text
Textual amendments
- F1
Regulation revoked (31.12.2020) by The International Accounting Standards and European Public Limited-Liability Company (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/685), reg. 1(2), Sch. 2 para. 34 (with reg. 20(2)) (as amended by S.I. 2020/335, regs. 1, 5); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
Contents
- 1Article 1 Repealed
- 2Article 2 Repealed
- 3Article 3 Repealed
- Signature
- Annex: INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS Repealed
- Division Repealed
- AMENDMENTS TO IFRS 1First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards Repealed
- PRESENTATION AND DISCLOSURE Repealed
- Explanation of transition to IFRSs Repealed
- Use of deemed cost after severe hyperinflation Repealed
- 31CIf an entity elects to measure assets and liabilities at fair value and to use that fair value as the deemed cost in its opening IFRS statement of financial position because of severe hyperinflation (see paragraphs D26–D30), the entity’s first IFRS financial statements shall disclose an explanation of how, and why, the entity had, and then ceased to have, a functional currency that has both of the following characteristics: Repealed
- Appendix BExceptions to the retrospective application of other IFRSs Repealed
- Derecognition of financial assets and financial liabilities Repealed
- B2Division B2 Repealed
- AMENDMENTS TO IFRS 9 Repealed
- IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (issued November 2009) Repealed
- IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (issued October 2010) Repealed
- Amendments to IAS 12Income Taxes Repealed
- DEFINITIONS Repealed
- Tax base Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- MEASUREMENT Repealed
- 51AIn some jurisdictions, the manner in which an entity recovers (settles) the carrying amount of an asset (liability) may affect either or both of: Repealed
- Example A Repealed
- Example B Repealed
- Division Repealed
- Example C Repealed
- Division Repealed
- 51BDivision 51B Repealed
- 51CDivision 51C Repealed
- Example illustrating paragraph 51C Repealed
- 51DDivision 51D Repealed
- 51EDivision 51E Repealed
- EFFECTIVE DATE Repealed
- 98Division 98 Repealed
- WITHDRAWAL OF SIC-21 Repealed
- 99Division 99 Repealed
- INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARD 13Fair Value Measurement Repealed
- OBJECTIVE Repealed
- 1This IFRS: Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- SCOPE Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- 6The measurement and disclosure requirements of this IFRS do not apply to the following: Repealed
- 7The disclosures required by this IFRS are not required for the following: Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- MEASUREMENT Repealed
- Definition of fair value Repealed
- 9Division 9 Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- The asset or liability Repealed
- 11A fair value measurement is for a particular asset or liability. Therefore, when measuring fair value an entity shall take into account the characteristics of the asset or liability if market participants would take those characteristics into account when pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Such characteristics include, for example, the following: Repealed
- 12Division 12 Repealed
- 13The asset or liability measured at fair value might be either of the following: Repealed
- 14Division 14 Repealed
- The transaction Repealed
- 15Division 15 Repealed
- 16A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability takes place either: Repealed
- 17Division 17 Repealed
- 18Division 18 Repealed
- 19Division 19 Repealed
- 20Division 20 Repealed
- 21Division 21 Repealed
- Market participants Repealed
- 22Division 22 Repealed
- 23In developing those assumptions, an entity need not identify specific market participants. Rather, the entity shall identify characteristics that distinguish market participants generally, considering factors specific to all the following: Repealed
- The price Repealed
- 24Division 24 Repealed
- 25Division 25 Repealed
- 26Division 26 Repealed
- Application to non-financial assets Repealed
- Highest and best use for non-financial assets Repealed
- 27Division 27 Repealed
- 28The highest and best use of a non-financial asset takes into account the use of the asset that is physically possible, legally permissible and financially feasible, as follows: Repealed
- 29Division 29 Repealed
- 30Division 30 Repealed
- Valuation premise for non-financial assets Repealed
- 31The highest and best use of a non-financial asset establishes the valuation premise used to measure the fair value of the asset, as follows: Repealed
- 32Division 32 Repealed
- 33Division 33 Repealed
- Application to liabilities and an entity’s own equity instruments Repealed
- General principles Repealed
- 34A fair value measurement assumes that a financial or non-financial liability or an entity’s own equity instrument (eg equity interests issued as consideration in a business combination) is transferred to a market participant at the measurement date. The transfer of a liability or an entity’s own equity instrument assumes the following: Repealed
- 35Division 35 Repealed
- 36Division 36 Repealed
- Liabilities and equity instruments held by other parties as assets Repealed
- 37Division 37 Repealed
- 38In such cases, an entity shall measure the fair value of the liability or equity instrument as follows: Repealed
- 39An entity shall adjust the quoted price of a liability or an entity’s own equity instrument held by another party as an asset only if there are factors specific to the asset that are not applicable to the fair value measurement of the liability or equity instrument. An entity shall ensure that the price of the asset does not reflect the effect of a restriction preventing the sale of that asset. Some factors that may indicate that the quoted price of the asset should be adjusted include the following: Repealed
- Liabilities and equity instruments not held by other parties as assets Repealed
- 40Division 40 Repealed
- 41For example, when applying a present value technique an entity might take into account either of the following: Repealed
- Non-performance risk Repealed
- 42Division 42 Repealed
- 43When measuring the fair value of a liability, an entity shall take into account the effect of its credit risk (credit standing) and any other factors that might influence the likelihood that the obligation will or will not be fulfilled. That effect may differ depending on the liability, for example: Repealed
- 44Division 44 Repealed
- Restriction preventing the transfer of a liability or an entity’s own equity instrument Repealed
- 45Division 45 Repealed
- 46Division 46 Repealed
- Financial liability with a demand feature Repealed
- 47Division 47 Repealed
- Application to financial assets and financial liabilities with offsetting positions in market risks or counterparty credit risk Repealed
- 48Division 48 Repealed
- 49An entity is permitted to use the exception in paragraph 48 only if the entity does all the following: Repealed
- 50Division 50 Repealed
- 51Division 51 Repealed
- 52Division 52 Repealed
- Exposure to market risks Repealed
- 53Division 53 Repealed
- 54Division 54 Repealed
- 55Division 55 Repealed
- Exposure to the credit risk of a particular counterparty Repealed
- 56Division 56 Repealed
- Fair value at initial recognition Repealed
- 57Division 57 Repealed
- 58Division 58 Repealed
- 59Division 59 Repealed
- 60Division 60 Repealed
- Valuation techniques Repealed
- 61Division 61 Repealed
- 62Division 62 Repealed
- 63Division 63 Repealed
- 64Division 64 Repealed
- 65Valuation techniques used to measure fair value shall be applied consistently. However, a change in a valuation technique or its application (eg a change in its weighting when multiple valuation techniques are used or a change in an adjustment applied to a valuation technique) is appropriate if the change results in a measurement that is equally or more representative of fair value in the circumstances. That might be the case if, for example, any of the following events take place: Repealed
- 66Division 66 Repealed
- Inputs to valuation techniques Repealed
- General principles Repealed
- 67Division 67 Repealed
- 68Division 68 Repealed
- 69Division 69 Repealed
- Inputs based on bid and ask prices Repealed
- 70Division 70 Repealed
- 71Division 71 Repealed
- Fair value hierarchy Repealed
- 72Division 72 Repealed
- 73Division 73 Repealed
- 74Division 74 Repealed
- 75Division 75 Repealed
- Level 1 inputs Repealed
- 76Division 76 Repealed
- 77Division 77 Repealed
- 78A Level 1 input will be available for many financial assets and financial liabilities, some of which might be exchanged in multiple active markets (eg on different exchanges). Therefore, the emphasis within Level 1 is on determining both of the following: Repealed
- 79An entity shall not make an adjustment to a Level 1 input except in the following circumstances: Repealed
- 80Division 80 Repealed
- Level 2 inputs Repealed
- 81Division 81 Repealed
- 82If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, a Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. Level 2 inputs include the following: Repealed
- 83Adjustments to Level 2 inputs will vary depending on factors specific to the asset or liability. Those factors include the following: Repealed
- 84Division 84 Repealed
- 85Division 85 Repealed
- Level 3 inputs Repealed
- 86Division 86 Repealed
- 87Division 87 Repealed
- 88Division 88 Repealed
- 89Division 89 Repealed
- 90Division 90 Repealed
- DISCLOSURE Repealed
- 91An entity shall disclose information that helps users of its financial statements assess both of the following: Repealed
- 92To meet the objectives in paragraph 91, an entity shall consider all the following: Repealed
- 93To meet the objectives in paragraph 91, an entity shall disclose, at a minimum, the following information for each class of assets and liabilities (see paragraph 94 for information on determining appropriate classes of assets and liabilities) measured at fair value (including measurements based on fair value within the scope of this IFRS) in the statement of financial position after initial recognition: Repealed
- 94An entity shall determine appropriate classes of assets and liabilities on the basis of the following: Repealed
- 95An entity shall disclose and consistently follow its policy for determining when transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are deemed to have occurred in accordance with paragraph 93(c) and (e)(iv). The policy about the timing of recognising transfers shall be the same for transfers into the levels as for transfers out of the levels. Examples of policies for determining the timing of transfers include the following: Repealed
- 96Division 96 Repealed
- 97Division 97 Repealed
- 98Division 98 Repealed
- 99Division 99 Repealed
- Appendix ADefined terms Repealed
- IFRIC INTERPRETATION 20Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine Repealed
- REFERENCES Repealed
- BACKGROUND Repealed
- 1Division 1 Repealed
- 2Division 2 Repealed
- 3Division 3 Repealed
- 4Division 4 Repealed
- 5Division 5 Repealed
- SCOPE Repealed
- 6Division 6 Repealed
- ISSUES Repealed
- 7This Interpretation addresses the following issues: Repealed
- CONSENSUS Repealed
- Recognition of production stripping costs as an asset Repealed
- 8Division 8 Repealed
- 9An entity shall recognise a stripping activity asset if, and only if, all of the following are met: Repealed
- 10Division 10 Repealed
- 11Division 11 Repealed
- Initial measurement of the stripping activity asset Repealed
- 12Division 12 Repealed
- 13When the costs of the stripping activity asset and the inventory produced are not separately identifiable, the entity shall allocate the production stripping costs between the inventory produced and the stripping activity asset by using an allocation basis that is based on a relevant production measure. This production measure shall be calculated for the identified component of the ore body, and shall be used as a benchmark to identify the extent to which the additional activity of creating a future benefit has taken place. Examples of such measures include: Repealed
- Subsequent measurement of the stripping activity asset Repealed
- 14Division 14 Repealed
- 15Division 15 Repealed
- 16Division 16 Repealed
- Appendix AEffective date and transition Repealed
- A1Division A1 Repealed
- A2Division A2 Repealed
- A3Division A3 Repealed
- A4Division A4 Repealed