OpenLegislation

Division 4 Reason for the opposition:

United Kingdom

Original text. Later amendments are not shown.

For PDO PGI:

  1. a

    Non-compliance with the conditions laid down in Article 5 and 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012

  2. b

    Registration of the name would be contrary to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 (plant variety or animal breed)

  3. c

    Registration of the name would be contrary to Article 6(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 (name wholly or partially homonymous)

  4. d

    Registration of the name would be contrary to Article 6(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 (F1... trade mark)

  5. e

    Registration would jeopardize the existence of names, trade marks or products as specified in point (c) of Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012

  6. f

    The name proposed for registration is generic; details to be provided as set down in point (d) of Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012

For TSG:

  1. a

    Non-compliance with the conditions laid down in Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012

  2. b

    Registration of the name would be incompatible with the terms of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 (point (a) of Article 21(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012).

  3. c

    The name proposed for registration is lawful, renowned and economically significant for similar agricultural products or foodstuffs (point (b) of Article 21(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012).

Annotations

Textual amendments

F1

Word in Annex 3 s. 4 omitted (coming into force in accordance with s. 7(1) of the amending Act) by virtue of Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Act 2024 (c. 6), s. 4(8) (with s. 4(10))