OpenLegislation

Chapter 2 Risk ranking to be applied in certain approved aquaculture establishments

United Kingdom

Original text. Later amendments are not shown.

The risk ranking referred to in point 1.2 of Chapter 1 must as a minimum, take into account the risk factors referred to in points (a) and (b). Where relevant, points (c) to (l) will also be considered:

  1. (a)

    possibility of the direct spread of pathogens via water;

  2. (b)

    movements of aquaculture animals;

  3. (c)

    type of production;

  4. (d)

    species of aquaculture animals kept;

  5. (e)

    biosecurity system, including staff competence and training;

  6. (f)

    density of aquaculture establishments and processing establishments in the area around the establishment concerned;

  7. (g)

    proximity of establishments with a lower health status than the establishment concerned;

  8. (h)

    disease history of the establishment concerned and of other local establishments;

  9. (i)

    presence of infected wild aquatic animals in the area around the establishment concerned;

  10. (j)

    risk posed by human activities in the proximity of the establishment concerned for example angling, the presence of transport routes, ports at which ballast water is exchanged;

  11. (k)

    access to the establishment concerned by predators which may cause disease spread;

  12. (l)

    track record of the establishment as regards compliance with the requirements of the competent authority.