Commission Decision of 11 March 2010 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2010) 1317) (Only the Bulgarian, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic) (2010/152/EU)
EU Decision 2010/152 · Adopted 11 March 2010 · Extends to United Kingdom
Commission Decision
of 11 March 2010
excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
(notified under document C(2010) 1317)
(Only the Bulgarian, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic)
(2010/152/EU)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the financing of the common agricultural policyf1, and in particular Article 7(4) thereof,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policyf2, and in particular Article 31 thereof,
Having consulted the Committee on the Agricultural Funds,
Whereas:
(1)
Under Article 7(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999, and Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, the Commission is to carry out the necessary verifications, communicate to the Member States the results of these verifications, take note of the comments of the Member States, initiate a bilateral discussion so that an agreement may be reached with the Member States in question, and formally communicate its conclusions to them.
(2)
The Member States have had an opportunity to request the launch of a conciliation procedure. That opportunity has been used in some cases and the reports issued on the outcome have been examined by the Commission.
(3)
Under Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, only agricultural expenditure which has been incurred in a way that has not infringed European Union rules may be financed.
(4)
In the light of the verifications carried out, the outcome of the bilateral discussions and the conciliation procedures, part of the expenditure declared by the Member States does not fulfil this requirement and cannot, therefore, be financed under the EAGGF Guarantee Section, the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund, hereinafter referred to as EAGF, and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, hereinafter referred to as EAFRD.
(5)
The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGGF Guarantee Section, the EAGF and the EAFRD should be indicated. Those amounts do not relate to expenditure incurred more than 24 months before the Commission’s written notification of the results of the verifications to the Member States.
(6)
As regards the cases covered by this Decision, the assessment of the amounts to be excluded on grounds of non-compliance with European Union rules was notified by the Commission to the Member States in a summary report on the subject.
(7)
This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice in cases pending on 30 September 2009 and relating to its content,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Annotations to the whole text
Footnotes
Contents
1
The expenditure itemised in the Annex hereto that has been incurred by the Member States’ accredited paying agencies and declared under the EAGGF Guarantee Section, under the EAGF or under the EAFRD shall be excluded from European Union financing because it does not comply with European Union rules.
2
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
BUDGET ITEM 6701
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason for correction | Type | % | Currency | Amount | Deductions already made | Financial impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BE | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | EUR | –593,3 | –593,3 | 0,0 | |
| Total BE | –593,3 | –593,3 | 0,0 | ||||||
| BG | Financial audit — payment deadlines | 2008 | Non-respect of payment deadlines | one-off | EUR | –10 969,94 | –10 969,94 | 0,0 | |
| Total BG | –10 969,94 | –10 969,94 | 0,0 | ||||||
| CY | Direct Payments | 2005 | Law quality and incorrect timing of on-the-spot checks, deficiencies in GAEC criteria controls Weak general control environment | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –756 946,49 | 0,0 | –756 946,49 |
| Total CY | –756 946,49 | 0,0 | –756 946,49 | ||||||
| DE | Direct Payments | 2006 | Wrong application of reductions and exclusions | one-off | EUR | –6 712 699,14 | 0,0 | –6 712 699,14 | |
| DE | Financial audit — payment deadlines | 2008 | Non-respect of payment deadlines | one-off | EUR | –37 390,29 | –37 390,29 | 0,0 | |
| Total DE | –6 750 089,43 | –37 390,29 | –6 712 699,14 | ||||||
| DK | Cross Compliance | 2006 | Insufficient quantity and quality of key and ancillary controls | flat-rate | 5,0 | DKK | –10 302 438,99 | 0,0 | –10 302 438,99 |
| DK | Cross Compliance | 2006 | Insufficient quantity and quality of key and ancillary controls | one-off | DKK | –495 596,61 | 0,0 | –495 596,61 | |
| DK | Cross Compliance | 2007 | Compensation following adjustments made by the MS in annual declarations | DKK | 16 823,86 | 0,0 | 16 823,86 | ||
| DK | Cross Compliance | 2007 | Insufficient quantity and quality of key and ancillary controls | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –2 912 878,81 | 0,0 | –2 912 878,81 |
| DK | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2003 | Insufficient quantity of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 2,0 | DKK | –8 883 403,83 | 0,0 | –8 883 403,83 |
| DK | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2005 | Insufficient quantity of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 2,0 | DKK | –40 706,28 | 0,0 | –40 706,28 |
| DK | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2005 | Non-respect of definition of suckler cow | one-off | EUR | –229 600,0 | 0,0 | –229 600,0 | |
| DK | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2004 | Insufficient quantity of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 2,0 | DKK | –7 410,47 | 0,0 | –7 410,47 |
| DK | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2004 | Compensation following adjustments made by the MS in annual declarations | EUR | 1 363,55 | 0,0 | 1 363,55 | ||
| DK | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2004 | Non-respect of definition of suckler cow | one-off | EUR | –164 800,0 | 0,0 | –164 800,0 | |
| DK | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2005 | Compensation following adjustments made by the MS in annual declarations | EUR | 2 519,93 | 0,0 | 2 519,93 | ||
| DK | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2006 | Compensation following adjustments made by the MS in annual declarations | DKK | 9 238,2 | 0,0 | 9 238,2 | ||
| Total DK (EUR) | –3 303 395,33 | 0,0 | –3 303 395,33 | ||||||
| Total DK (DKK) | –19 703 494,12 | 0,0 | –19 703 494,12 | ||||||
| EE | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | EUR | –30 242,24 | –30 242,24 | 0,0 | |
| Total EE | –30 242,24 | –30 242,24 | 0,0 | ||||||
| ES | Clearance of accounts | 2004 | Unrecoverable debt | one-off | EUR | –12 466,39 | 0,0 | –12 466,39 | |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2006 | Lack of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –2 226 313,51 | 0,0 | –2 226 313,51 |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2007 | Lack of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –18 615,65 | 0,0 | –18 615,65 |
| ES | Financial audit — payment deadlines | 2008 | Non-respect of payment deadlines | one-off | EUR | –3 919 231,56 | –4 103 814,39 | 184 582,83 | |
| ES | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Ineligible expenditure, milk levy and failure to repay amounts due to cross-compliance | one-off | EUR | 8 318,45 | 8 318,45 | 0,0 | |
| ES | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | EUR | –823 800,98 | –823 800,98 | 0,0 | |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2004 | Ineligible cost of environmental management of packaging | one-off | EUR | –3 929 919,02 | 0,0 | –3 929 919,02 | |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2005 | Ineligible cost of environmental management of packaging | one-off | EUR | –14 719 270,21 | 0,0 | –14 719 270,21 | |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2006 | Ineligible cost of environmental management of packaging | one-off | EUR | –17 337 716,29 | 0,0 | –17 337 716,29 | |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups | 2003 | Ineligible cost of environmental management of packaging | one-off | EUR | –1 243 226,69 | 0,0 | –1 243 226,69 | |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups | 2003 | Weaknesses in the key control (insufficient checks on double funding) | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –2 130 607,74 | 0,0 | –2 130 607,74 |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups | 2004 | Ineligible cost of environmental management of packaging | one-off | EUR | –1 096 997,97 | 0,0 | –1 096 997,97 | |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups | 2004 | Weaknesses in the key control (insufficient checks on double funding) | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –2 496 111,63 | 0,0 | –2 496 111,63 |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups | 2005 | Weaknesses in the key control (insufficient checks on double funding) | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –2 359 546,06 | 0,0 | –2 359 546,06 |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups | 2006 | Weaknesses in the key control (insufficient checks on double funding) | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –2 148 564,48 | 0,0 | –2 148 564,48 |
| ES | Hemp — production aid | 1997 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05 | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | 112 677,49 | 0,0 | 112 677,49 |
| ES | Hemp — production aid | 1998 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05 | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | 290 132,36 | 0,0 | 290 132,36 |
| ES | Hemp — production aid | 1999 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05 | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | 220,24 | 0,0 | 220,24 |
| ES | Hemp — production aid | 1999 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05 | flat-rate | 25,0 | EUR | 3 135 672,08 | 0,0 | 3 135 672,08 |
| ES | Hemp — production aid | 2000 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05 | flat-rate | 25,0 | EUR | 1 417 423,82 | 0,0 | 1 417 423,82 |
| ES | Hemp — production aid | 2001 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05 | flat-rate | 25,0 | EUR | 331 466,05 | 0,0 | 331 466,05 |
| ES | Hemp — production aid | 2002 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05 | flat-rate | 25,0 | EUR | –1 014,83 | 0,0 | –1 014,83 |
| Total ES | –49 167 492,52 | –4 919 296,92 | –44 248 195,6 | ||||||
| FI | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | EUR | –2 432,42 | –2 432,42 | 0,0 | |
| Total FI | –2 432,42 | –2 432,42 | 0,0 | ||||||
| FR | Clearance of accounts | 2002 | Debts management: non-recovery of debts | one-off | EUR | –256 801,47 | 0,0 | –256 801,47 | |
| FR | Clearance of accounts | 2002 | Overshooting of ceilings | one-off | EUR | –464 310,98 | 0,0 | –464 310,98 | |
| FR | Clearance of accounts | 2004 | Most likely error | one-off | EUR | –178 075,49 | 0,0 | –178 075,49 | |
| FR | Clearance of accounts | 2005 | Debts management: non-recovery of debts | one-off | EUR | –66 012,51 | 0,0 | –66 012,51 | |
| FR | Clearance of accounts | 2005 | Systematic error | one-off | EUR | –62 342,03 | 0,0 | –62 342,03 | |
| FR | Dried Fodder | 2005 | Insufficient quantity of samples taken and low quality of their examination | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –680 596,08 | 0,0 | –680 596,08 |
| FR | Dried Fodder | 2006 | Insufficient quantity of samples taken and low quality of their examination | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –1 514 646,79 | 0,0 | –1 514 646,79 |
| FR | Dried Fodder | 2007 | Insufficient quantity of samples taken and low quality of their examination | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –849 968,48 | 0,0 | –849 968,48 |
| FR | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2006 | Ineligible cost of environmental management of packaging Personnel costs too high Insufficient justification for specific costs of certified plants | one-off | EUR | –205 654,66 | 0,0 | –205 654,66 | |
| FR | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2007 | Ineligible cost of environmental management of packaging Personnel costs too high Insufficient justification for specific costs of certified plants | one-off | EUR | –4 402 146,53 | 0,0 | –4 402 146,53 | |
| FR | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2008 | Ineligible cost of environmental management of packaging Personnel costs too high Insufficient justification for specific costs of certified plants | one-off | EUR | –2 250 805,13 | 0,0 | –2 250 805,13 | |
| FR | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2003 | Weaknes on the application of sanctions at national level | one-off | EUR | –2 175 736,0 | 0,0 | –2 175 736,0 | |
| FR | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2004 | Weaknes on the application of sanctions at national level | one-off | EUR | –1 586 850,0 | 0,0 | –1 586 850,0 | |
| FR | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2004 | Very weak control environment and absence of the suckler cow status of the herd | flat-rate | 25,0 | EUR | –1 825 745,07 | 0,0 | –1 825 745,07 |
| FR | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2004 | Very weak control environment | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –161 858,24 | 0,0 | –161 858,24 |
| FR | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2005 | Very weak control environment and absence of the suckler cow status of the herd | flat-rate | 25,0 | EUR | –1 835 682,64 | 0,0 | –1 835 682,64 |
| FR | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2005 | Very weak control environment | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –171 143,0 | 0,0 | –171 143,0 |
| FR | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2006 | Very weak control environment | flat-rate | 25,0 | EUR | –8 361,56 | 0,0 | –8 361,56 |
| FR | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2006 | Very weak control environment | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –86 986,2 | 0,0 | –86 986,2 |
| FR | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2006 | Very weak control environment | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –722 979,52 | 0,0 | –722 979,52 |
| Total FR | –19 506 702,38 | 0,0 | –19 506 702,38 | ||||||
| GB | Direct Payments | 2006 | Incorrect application of reductions and exclusions | one-off | GBP | –8 122,33 | 0,0 | –8 122,33 | |
| GB | Direct Payments | 2007 | Incorrect application of reductions and exclusions | one-off | GBP | –9 623,98 | 0,0 | –9 623,98 | |
| GB | Financial audit — payment deadlines | 2008 | Non-respect of payment deadlines | one-off | EUR | –14 180 950,72 | –14 311 495,63 | 130 544,91 | |
| GB | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | EUR | –262 732,55 | –262 732,55 | 0,0 | |
| GB | Rural Development EAGGF Axis 2 | 2005 | Weaknesses in key checks and in adminitrative controls Insufficient checks of GAEC criteria and cross-checks with animal database | flat-rate | 5,0 | GBP | –36 364,0 | 0,0 | –36 364,0 |
| GB | Rural Development EAGGF Axis 2 | 2006 | Weaknesses in key checks and in adminitrative controls Insufficient checks of GAEC criteria and cross-checks with animal database | flat-rate | 5,0 | GBP | –3 254 010,0 | 0,0 | –3 254 010,0 |
| Total GB (GBP) | –3 308 120,31 | 0,0 | –3 308 120,31 | ||||||
| Total GB (EUR) | –14 443 683,27 | –14 574 228,18 | 130 544,91 | ||||||
| GR | Food Aid within the Community | 2005 | Ineligible costs resulting from late withdrawals and late distribution | one-off | EUR | –1 310 306,02 | 0,0 | –1 310 306,02 | |
| GR | Food Aid within the Community | 2006 | Ineligible costs resulting from late withdrawals and late distribution | one-off | EUR | –6 799 511,68 | 0,0 | –6 799 511,68 | |
| GR | Food Aid within the Community | 2007 | Ineligible costs of storage resulting from late withdrawals | one-off | EUR | –220 830,34 | 0,0 | –220 830,34 | |
| GR | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2005 | Value of Marketed Production (VMP), used for calculating Community aid, wrongly established | one-off | EUR | –38 933,4 | 0,0 | –38 933,4 | |
| GR | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2006 | Value of Marketed Production (VMP), used for calculating Community aid, wrongly established | one-off | EUR | –127 757,63 | 0,0 | –127 757,63 | |
| GR | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2007 | Value of Marketed Production (VMP), used for calculating Community aid, wrongly established | one-off | EUR | –148 714,8 | 0,0 | –148 714,8 | |
| GR | Cotton | 2004 | Weak control system. Deficiencies in the control of area and environmental measures | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –12 022,67 | 0,0 | –12 022,67 |
| GR | Cotton | 2004 | Overshooting the production quantities permitted by the Regulations | one-off | EUR | –37 392,0 | 0,0 | –37 392,0 | |
| GR | Cotton | 2005 | Weak control system. Deficiencies in the control of area and environmental measures | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –34 573 887,48 | 0,0 | –34 573 887,48 |
| GR | Cotton | 2005 | Overshooting the production quantities permitted by the Regulations | one-off | EUR | –1 284 276,0 | 0,0 | –1 284 276,0 | |
| GR | Cotton | 2006 | Weak control system. Deficiencies in the control of area and environmental measures | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –68 134 305,29 | 0,0 | –68 134 305,29 |
| GR | Cotton | 2006 | Weak control system. Deficiencies in the control of area and environmental measures | one-off | EUR | –1 411 287,0 | 0,0 | –1 411 287,0 | |
| GR | Olive Oil — Consumption Aid | 1996 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-243/05 | one-off | EUR | 67 626,66 | 0,0 | 67 626,66 | |
| GR | Olive Oil — Consumption Aid | 1997 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-243/05 | one-off | EUR | 116 091,92 | 0,0 | 116 091,92 | |
| GR | Olive Oil — Consumption Aid | 1998 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-243/05 | one-off | EUR | 16 428,1 | 0,0 | 16 428,1 | |
| GR | RD Guarantee (area related measures) | 2005 | Persistent weaknesses in IACS system. Deficiencies in control reports. Delayed performance of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –8 498 907,0 | 0,0 | –8 498 907,0 |
| GR | RD Guarantee (area related measures) | 2006 | Persistent weaknesses in IACS system. Deficiencies in control reports. Delayed performance of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –349 453,0 | 0,0 | –349 453,0 |
| GR | RD Guarantee (area related measures) | 2006 | Persistent weaknesses in IACS system. Deficiencies in control reports. Delayed performance of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –6 168 408,0 | 0,0 | –6 168 408,0 |
| GR | RD Guarantee new measures | 2005 | Persistent weaknesses in IACS system. Deficiencies in control reports. Delayed performance of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –690 219,0 | 0,0 | –690 219,0 |
| GR | RD Guarantee new measures | 2006 | Persistent weaknesses in IACS system. Deficiencies in control reports. Delayed performance of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –2 816 729,0 | 0,0 | –2 816 729,0 |
| Total GR | –132 422 793,63 | 0,0 | –132 422 793,63 | ||||||
| HU | Rural Development Guarantee | 2005 | Reimbursement due to double correction (under Commission Decision 2009/721/EC and recovery order GFO.09.025 concerning TRDI program 2004HU06GDO001) | one-off | HUF | 42 638 662,0 | 0,0 | 42 638 662,0 | |
| Total HU | 42 638 662,0 | 0,0 | 42 638 662,0 | ||||||
| IE | Dairy premium | 2005 | Non-application of aid reductions towards farmers lodging their aid applications after deadline | one-off | EUR | –367 181,29 | 0,0 | –367 181,29 | |
| IE | Financial audit — payment deadlines | 2008 | Non-respect of payment deadlines | one-off | EUR | –152 676,24 | –152 676,24 | 0,0 | |
| Total IE | –519 857,53 | –152 676,24 | –367 181,29 | ||||||
| IT | Financial audit — payment deadlines | 2008 | Ineligible expenditure | one-off | EUR | –9 345,0 | –9 345,0 | 0,0 | |
| IT | Financial audit — payment deadlines | 2008 | Non-respect of payment deadlines | one-off | EUR | –1 877 812,65 | –1 877 812,65 | 0,0 | |
| IT | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2007 | Ineligible expenditure | EUR | –18 750,0 | 0,0 | –18 750,0 | ||
| Total IT | –1 905 907,65 | –1 887 157,65 | –18 750,0 | ||||||
| LU | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | EUR | –1 273,9 | –1 273,9 | 0,0 | |
| LU | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2001 | Lack of adminitrative controls concerning retention period. Lack of on-the-spot controls. Inappropriate calculation of sanctions | one-off | EUR | –18 292,47 | 0,0 | –18 292,47 | |
| LU | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2002 | Lack of adminitrative controls concerning retention period. Lack of on-the-spot controls. Inappropriate calculation of sanctions | one-off | EUR | –3 973,52 | 0,0 | –3 973,52 | |
| LU | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2003 | Lack of adminitrative controls concerning retention period. Lack of on-the-spot controls. Inappropriate calculation of sanctions | one-off | EUR | –150 184,7 | 0,0 | –150 184,7 | |
| LU | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2004 | Lack of adminitrative controls concerning retention period. Lack of on-the-spot controls. Inappropriate calculation of sanctions | one-off | EUR | –190 950,23 | 0,0 | –190 950,23 | |
| Total LU | –364 674,82 | –1 273,9 | –363 400,92 | ||||||
| NL | Clearance of accounts | 2000-04 | Tested population errors | one-off | EUR | –481 542,94 | 0,0 | –481 542,94 | |
| NL | Clearance of accounts | 2004 | Tested population errors | one-off | EUR | –46 697,81 | 0,0 | –46 697,81 | |
| NL | Clearance of accounts | 2005 | Tested population errors | one-off | EUR | –402 695,0 | 0,0 | –402 695,0 | |
| NL | Export Refunds | 2003 | Insuficient number of sustitution checks performed | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –4 037 899,76 | 0,0 | –4 037 899,76 |
| NL | Export Refunds | 2003 | Insuficient number of sustitution checks performed | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –4 083 396,09 | 0,0 | –4 083 396,09 |
| NL | Export Refunds | 2004 | Insuficient number of sustitution checks performed | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –1 062 605,2 | 0,0 | –1 062 605,2 |
| NL | Export Refunds | 2004 | Insuficient number of sustitution checks performed | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –1 193 119,34 | 0,0 | –1 193 119,34 |
| NL | Export Refunds | 2005 | Insuficient number of sustitution checks performed | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –31 195,1 | 0,0 | –31 195,1 |
| NL | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2007 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | EUR | –914,7 | 0,0 | –914,7 | |
| NL | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Ineligible expenditure | one-off | EUR | –91 807,12 | –91 807,12 | 0,0 | |
| NL | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2004 | Weaknesses in the management of the herd registers and of the supporting documents | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –3 214 925,84 | 0,0 | –3 214 925,84 |
| NL | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2005 | Weaknesses in the management of the herd registers and of the supporting documents | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –3 559 908,74 | 0,0 | –3 559 908,74 |
| NL | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2006 | Weaknesses in the management of the herd registers and of the supporting documents | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –19 171,1 | 0,0 | –19 171,1 |
| Total NL | –18 225 878,74 | –91 807,12 | –18 134 071,62 | ||||||
| F1PL | Direct payments | 2006 | Land parcel system not completely vectorised. Acceptance of ineligible land for payments. Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance. | One-off | PLN | – 87 534 475,32 | 0,0 | – 87 534 475,32 | |
| PL | Direct payments | 2006 | Land parcel system not completely vectorised. Acceptance of ineligible land for payments. Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance. | Flat rate | 5,0 | PLN | – 11 811 934,21 | 0,0 | – 11 811 934,21 |
| PL | Direct payments | 2007 | Land parcel system not completely vectorised. Acceptance of ineligible land for payments. Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance. | Flat rate | 5,0 | EUR | – 2 293 418,87 | 0,0 | – 2 293 418,87 |
| PL | Direct payments | 2007 | Land parcel system not completely vectorised. Acceptance of ineligible land for payments. Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance. | One-off | EUR | – 23 290 577,94 | 0,0 | – 23 290 577,94 | |
| PL | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | One-off | EUR | 0,0 | – 1 894 213,61 | 1 894 213,61 | |
| Total PL (PLN) | – 99 346 409,53 | 0,0 | – 99 346 409,53 | ||||||
| Total PL (EUR) | – 25 583 996,81 | – 1 894 213,61 | – 23 689 783,2 | ||||||
| SE | Cross Compliance | 2006 | Insufficient quantity and quality of key and ancillary controls | flat-rate | 5,0 | SEK | –9 218 825,98 | 0,0 | –9 218 825,98 |
| SE | Cross Compliance | 2007 | Insufficient quantity and quality of key and ancillary controls | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –2 137 710,17 | 0,0 | –2 137 710,17 |
| SE | Financial audit — payment deadlines | 2008 | Non-respect of payment deadlines | one-off | EUR | –35 584,38 | –35 584,38 | 0,0 | |
| SE | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | EUR | –44,84 | –44,84 | 0,0 | |
| Total SE (SEK) | –9 218 825,98 | 0,0 | –9 218 825,98 | ||||||
| Total SE (EUR) | –2 173 339,39 | –35 629,22 | –2 137 710,17 | ||||||
BUDGET ITEM 6500
| F2MS | Measure | FY | Reason for correction | Type | % | Currency | Amount | Deductions already made | Financial impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PL | Rural Development EAGGF Transitional Instrument (2000-2006) | 2005 | Land parcel system not completely vectorised. Acceptance of ineligible land for payments. Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance. | Flat rate | 5,0 | PLN | – 1 408 667,08 | 0,0 | – 1 408 667,08 |
| PL | Rural Development EAGGF Transitional Instrument (2000-2006) | 2006 | Land parcel system not completely vectorised. Acceptance of ineligible land for payments. Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance. | One-off | PLN | – 18 510 167,85 | 0,0 | – 18 510 167,85 | |
| PL | Rural Development EAGGF Transitional Instrument (2000-2006) | 2006 | Land parcel system not completely vectorised. Acceptance of ineligible land for payments. Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance. | Flat rate | 5,0 | PLN | – 69 151 379,37 | 0,0 | – 69 151 379,37 |
| PL | Rural Development EAGGF Transitional Instrument (2000-2006) | 2007 | Land parcel system not completely vectorised. Acceptance of ineligible land for payments. Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance. | One-off | PLN | – 12 943 389,24 | 0,0 | – 12 943 389,24 | |
| PL | Rural Development EAGGF Transitional Instrument (2000-2006) | 2007 | Land parcel system not completely vectorised. Acceptance of ineligible land for payments. Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance. | Flat rate | 5,0 | PLN | – 78 434 429,08 | 0,0 | – 78 434 429,08 |
| Total PL (PLN) | – 180 448 032,62 | 0,0 | – 180 448 032,62 | ||||||
| Grand total (PLN) | – 279 794 442,15 | 0,0 | – 279 794 442,15 |
| Grand total (EUR) | – 25 583 996,81 | – 1 894 213,61 | – 23 689 783,2 |
| MS | Programme | FY | Reason for correction | Type | % | Currency | Amount | Deductions already made | Financial impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SK | RD Guarantee (programme 2004 SK 06 GDO 001) | 2005 | Incorrect control procedure resulting in insufficient controls within chosen samples | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –1 249 561,0 | 0,0 | –1 249 561,0 |
| SK | RD Guarantee (programme 2004 SK 06 GDO 001) | 2006 | Incorrect control procedure resulting in insufficient controls within chosen samples | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –1 784 419,0 | 0,0 | –1 784 419,0 |
| SK | RD Guarantee (programme 2004 SK 06 GDO 001) | 2007 | Incorrect control procedure resulting in insufficient controls within chosen samples | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –933,0 | 0,0 | –933,0 |
| Total SK | –3 034 913,0 | 0,0 | –3 034 913,0 | ||||||
BUDGET ITEM 6711
| MS | Programme | FY | Reason for correction | Type | % | Currency | Amount | Deductions already made | Financial impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB | Rural Development Programme 2007UK06RPO001 | 2007 | Weaknesses in key checks and in adminitrative controls Insufficient checks of GAEC criteria and cross-checks with animal database | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –39 244,0 | 0,0 | –39 244,0 |
| Total GB | –39 244,0 | 0,0 | –39 244,0 | ||||||
BUDGET ITEM 05 07 01 07
| MS | Programme | FY | Reason for correction | Type | % | Currency | Amount | Deductions already made | Financial impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HU | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Ineligible expenditure | one-off | EUR | –5 622,81 | –5 622,81 | 0,0 | |
| HU | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | EUR | 21 511,01 | –5 432,55 | 26 943,56 | |
| Total HU (EUR) | 15 888,2 | –11 055,36 | 26 943,56 | ||||||
| PT | Direct Payments | 2004 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-50/07 | one-off | EUR | 1 983 698,0 | 0,0 | 1 983 698,0 | |
| PT | Flax — Production Aid | 2001 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-183/06 | one-off | EUR | 3 135 348,71 | 3 135 348,71 | ||
| Total PT | 5 119 046,71 | 0,0 | 5 119 046,71 | ||||||