Annex
United Kingdom
BUDGET ITEM 6701
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason for correction | Type | % | Currency | Amount | Deductions already made | Financial impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BE | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | EUR | –593,3 | –593,3 | 0,0 | |
| Total BE | –593,3 | –593,3 | 0,0 | ||||||
| BG | Financial audit — payment deadlines | 2008 | Non-respect of payment deadlines | one-off | EUR | –10 969,94 | –10 969,94 | 0,0 | |
| Total BG | –10 969,94 | –10 969,94 | 0,0 | ||||||
| CY | Direct Payments | 2005 | Law quality and incorrect timing of on-the-spot checks, deficiencies in GAEC criteria controls Weak general control environment | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –756 946,49 | 0,0 | –756 946,49 |
| Total CY | –756 946,49 | 0,0 | –756 946,49 | ||||||
| DE | Direct Payments | 2006 | Wrong application of reductions and exclusions | one-off | EUR | –6 712 699,14 | 0,0 | –6 712 699,14 | |
| DE | Financial audit — payment deadlines | 2008 | Non-respect of payment deadlines | one-off | EUR | –37 390,29 | –37 390,29 | 0,0 | |
| Total DE | –6 750 089,43 | –37 390,29 | –6 712 699,14 | ||||||
| DK | Cross Compliance | 2006 | Insufficient quantity and quality of key and ancillary controls | flat-rate | 5,0 | DKK | –10 302 438,99 | 0,0 | –10 302 438,99 |
| DK | Cross Compliance | 2006 | Insufficient quantity and quality of key and ancillary controls | one-off | DKK | –495 596,61 | 0,0 | –495 596,61 | |
| DK | Cross Compliance | 2007 | Compensation following adjustments made by the MS in annual declarations | DKK | 16 823,86 | 0,0 | 16 823,86 | ||
| DK | Cross Compliance | 2007 | Insufficient quantity and quality of key and ancillary controls | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –2 912 878,81 | 0,0 | –2 912 878,81 |
| DK | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2003 | Insufficient quantity of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 2,0 | DKK | –8 883 403,83 | 0,0 | –8 883 403,83 |
| DK | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2005 | Insufficient quantity of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 2,0 | DKK | –40 706,28 | 0,0 | –40 706,28 |
| DK | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2005 | Non-respect of definition of suckler cow | one-off | EUR | –229 600,0 | 0,0 | –229 600,0 | |
| DK | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2004 | Insufficient quantity of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 2,0 | DKK | –7 410,47 | 0,0 | –7 410,47 |
| DK | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2004 | Compensation following adjustments made by the MS in annual declarations | EUR | 1 363,55 | 0,0 | 1 363,55 | ||
| DK | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2004 | Non-respect of definition of suckler cow | one-off | EUR | –164 800,0 | 0,0 | –164 800,0 | |
| DK | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2005 | Compensation following adjustments made by the MS in annual declarations | EUR | 2 519,93 | 0,0 | 2 519,93 | ||
| DK | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2006 | Compensation following adjustments made by the MS in annual declarations | DKK | 9 238,2 | 0,0 | 9 238,2 | ||
| Total DK (EUR) | –3 303 395,33 | 0,0 | –3 303 395,33 | ||||||
| Total DK (DKK) | –19 703 494,12 | 0,0 | –19 703 494,12 | ||||||
| EE | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | EUR | –30 242,24 | –30 242,24 | 0,0 | |
| Total EE | –30 242,24 | –30 242,24 | 0,0 | ||||||
| ES | Clearance of accounts | 2004 | Unrecoverable debt | one-off | EUR | –12 466,39 | 0,0 | –12 466,39 | |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2006 | Lack of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –2 226 313,51 | 0,0 | –2 226 313,51 |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2007 | Lack of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –18 615,65 | 0,0 | –18 615,65 |
| ES | Financial audit — payment deadlines | 2008 | Non-respect of payment deadlines | one-off | EUR | –3 919 231,56 | –4 103 814,39 | 184 582,83 | |
| ES | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Ineligible expenditure, milk levy and failure to repay amounts due to cross-compliance | one-off | EUR | 8 318,45 | 8 318,45 | 0,0 | |
| ES | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | EUR | –823 800,98 | –823 800,98 | 0,0 | |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2004 | Ineligible cost of environmental management of packaging | one-off | EUR | –3 929 919,02 | 0,0 | –3 929 919,02 | |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2005 | Ineligible cost of environmental management of packaging | one-off | EUR | –14 719 270,21 | 0,0 | –14 719 270,21 | |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2006 | Ineligible cost of environmental management of packaging | one-off | EUR | –17 337 716,29 | 0,0 | –17 337 716,29 | |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups | 2003 | Ineligible cost of environmental management of packaging | one-off | EUR | –1 243 226,69 | 0,0 | –1 243 226,69 | |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups | 2003 | Weaknesses in the key control (insufficient checks on double funding) | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –2 130 607,74 | 0,0 | –2 130 607,74 |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups | 2004 | Ineligible cost of environmental management of packaging | one-off | EUR | –1 096 997,97 | 0,0 | –1 096 997,97 | |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups | 2004 | Weaknesses in the key control (insufficient checks on double funding) | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –2 496 111,63 | 0,0 | –2 496 111,63 |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups | 2005 | Weaknesses in the key control (insufficient checks on double funding) | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –2 359 546,06 | 0,0 | –2 359 546,06 |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups | 2006 | Weaknesses in the key control (insufficient checks on double funding) | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –2 148 564,48 | 0,0 | –2 148 564,48 |
| ES | Hemp — production aid | 1997 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05 | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | 112 677,49 | 0,0 | 112 677,49 |
| ES | Hemp — production aid | 1998 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05 | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | 290 132,36 | 0,0 | 290 132,36 |
| ES | Hemp — production aid | 1999 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05 | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | 220,24 | 0,0 | 220,24 |
| ES | Hemp — production aid | 1999 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05 | flat-rate | 25,0 | EUR | 3 135 672,08 | 0,0 | 3 135 672,08 |
| ES | Hemp — production aid | 2000 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05 | flat-rate | 25,0 | EUR | 1 417 423,82 | 0,0 | 1 417 423,82 |
| ES | Hemp — production aid | 2001 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05 | flat-rate | 25,0 | EUR | 331 466,05 | 0,0 | 331 466,05 |
| ES | Hemp — production aid | 2002 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05 | flat-rate | 25,0 | EUR | –1 014,83 | 0,0 | –1 014,83 |
| Total ES | –49 167 492,52 | –4 919 296,92 | –44 248 195,6 | ||||||
| FI | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | EUR | –2 432,42 | –2 432,42 | 0,0 | |
| Total FI | –2 432,42 | –2 432,42 | 0,0 | ||||||
| FR | Clearance of accounts | 2002 | Debts management: non-recovery of debts | one-off | EUR | –256 801,47 | 0,0 | –256 801,47 | |
| FR | Clearance of accounts | 2002 | Overshooting of ceilings | one-off | EUR | –464 310,98 | 0,0 | –464 310,98 | |
| FR | Clearance of accounts | 2004 | Most likely error | one-off | EUR | –178 075,49 | 0,0 | –178 075,49 | |
| FR | Clearance of accounts | 2005 | Debts management: non-recovery of debts | one-off | EUR | –66 012,51 | 0,0 | –66 012,51 | |
| FR | Clearance of accounts | 2005 | Systematic error | one-off | EUR | –62 342,03 | 0,0 | –62 342,03 | |
| FR | Dried Fodder | 2005 | Insufficient quantity of samples taken and low quality of their examination | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –680 596,08 | 0,0 | –680 596,08 |
| FR | Dried Fodder | 2006 | Insufficient quantity of samples taken and low quality of their examination | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –1 514 646,79 | 0,0 | –1 514 646,79 |
| FR | Dried Fodder | 2007 | Insufficient quantity of samples taken and low quality of their examination | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –849 968,48 | 0,0 | –849 968,48 |
| FR | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2006 | Ineligible cost of environmental management of packaging Personnel costs too high Insufficient justification for specific costs of certified plants | one-off | EUR | –205 654,66 | 0,0 | –205 654,66 | |
| FR | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2007 | Ineligible cost of environmental management of packaging Personnel costs too high Insufficient justification for specific costs of certified plants | one-off | EUR | –4 402 146,53 | 0,0 | –4 402 146,53 | |
| FR | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2008 | Ineligible cost of environmental management of packaging Personnel costs too high Insufficient justification for specific costs of certified plants | one-off | EUR | –2 250 805,13 | 0,0 | –2 250 805,13 | |
| FR | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2003 | Weaknes on the application of sanctions at national level | one-off | EUR | –2 175 736,0 | 0,0 | –2 175 736,0 | |
| FR | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2004 | Weaknes on the application of sanctions at national level | one-off | EUR | –1 586 850,0 | 0,0 | –1 586 850,0 | |
| FR | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2004 | Very weak control environment and absence of the suckler cow status of the herd | flat-rate | 25,0 | EUR | –1 825 745,07 | 0,0 | –1 825 745,07 |
| FR | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2004 | Very weak control environment | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –161 858,24 | 0,0 | –161 858,24 |
| FR | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2005 | Very weak control environment and absence of the suckler cow status of the herd | flat-rate | 25,0 | EUR | –1 835 682,64 | 0,0 | –1 835 682,64 |
| FR | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2005 | Very weak control environment | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –171 143,0 | 0,0 | –171 143,0 |
| FR | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2006 | Very weak control environment | flat-rate | 25,0 | EUR | –8 361,56 | 0,0 | –8 361,56 |
| FR | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2006 | Very weak control environment | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –86 986,2 | 0,0 | –86 986,2 |
| FR | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2006 | Very weak control environment | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –722 979,52 | 0,0 | –722 979,52 |
| Total FR | –19 506 702,38 | 0,0 | –19 506 702,38 | ||||||
| GB | Direct Payments | 2006 | Incorrect application of reductions and exclusions | one-off | GBP | –8 122,33 | 0,0 | –8 122,33 | |
| GB | Direct Payments | 2007 | Incorrect application of reductions and exclusions | one-off | GBP | –9 623,98 | 0,0 | –9 623,98 | |
| GB | Financial audit — payment deadlines | 2008 | Non-respect of payment deadlines | one-off | EUR | –14 180 950,72 | –14 311 495,63 | 130 544,91 | |
| GB | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | EUR | –262 732,55 | –262 732,55 | 0,0 | |
| GB | Rural Development EAGGF Axis 2 | 2005 | Weaknesses in key checks and in adminitrative controls Insufficient checks of GAEC criteria and cross-checks with animal database | flat-rate | 5,0 | GBP | –36 364,0 | 0,0 | –36 364,0 |
| GB | Rural Development EAGGF Axis 2 | 2006 | Weaknesses in key checks and in adminitrative controls Insufficient checks of GAEC criteria and cross-checks with animal database | flat-rate | 5,0 | GBP | –3 254 010,0 | 0,0 | –3 254 010,0 |
| Total GB (GBP) | –3 308 120,31 | 0,0 | –3 308 120,31 | ||||||
| Total GB (EUR) | –14 443 683,27 | –14 574 228,18 | 130 544,91 | ||||||
| GR | Food Aid within the Community | 2005 | Ineligible costs resulting from late withdrawals and late distribution | one-off | EUR | –1 310 306,02 | 0,0 | –1 310 306,02 | |
| GR | Food Aid within the Community | 2006 | Ineligible costs resulting from late withdrawals and late distribution | one-off | EUR | –6 799 511,68 | 0,0 | –6 799 511,68 | |
| GR | Food Aid within the Community | 2007 | Ineligible costs of storage resulting from late withdrawals | one-off | EUR | –220 830,34 | 0,0 | –220 830,34 | |
| GR | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2005 | Value of Marketed Production (VMP), used for calculating Community aid, wrongly established | one-off | EUR | –38 933,4 | 0,0 | –38 933,4 | |
| GR | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2006 | Value of Marketed Production (VMP), used for calculating Community aid, wrongly established | one-off | EUR | –127 757,63 | 0,0 | –127 757,63 | |
| GR | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2007 | Value of Marketed Production (VMP), used for calculating Community aid, wrongly established | one-off | EUR | –148 714,8 | 0,0 | –148 714,8 | |
| GR | Cotton | 2004 | Weak control system. Deficiencies in the control of area and environmental measures | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –12 022,67 | 0,0 | –12 022,67 |
| GR | Cotton | 2004 | Overshooting the production quantities permitted by the Regulations | one-off | EUR | –37 392,0 | 0,0 | –37 392,0 | |
| GR | Cotton | 2005 | Weak control system. Deficiencies in the control of area and environmental measures | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –34 573 887,48 | 0,0 | –34 573 887,48 |
| GR | Cotton | 2005 | Overshooting the production quantities permitted by the Regulations | one-off | EUR | –1 284 276,0 | 0,0 | –1 284 276,0 | |
| GR | Cotton | 2006 | Weak control system. Deficiencies in the control of area and environmental measures | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –68 134 305,29 | 0,0 | –68 134 305,29 |
| GR | Cotton | 2006 | Weak control system. Deficiencies in the control of area and environmental measures | one-off | EUR | –1 411 287,0 | 0,0 | –1 411 287,0 | |
| GR | Olive Oil — Consumption Aid | 1996 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-243/05 | one-off | EUR | 67 626,66 | 0,0 | 67 626,66 | |
| GR | Olive Oil — Consumption Aid | 1997 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-243/05 | one-off | EUR | 116 091,92 | 0,0 | 116 091,92 | |
| GR | Olive Oil — Consumption Aid | 1998 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-243/05 | one-off | EUR | 16 428,1 | 0,0 | 16 428,1 | |
| GR | RD Guarantee (area related measures) | 2005 | Persistent weaknesses in IACS system. Deficiencies in control reports. Delayed performance of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –8 498 907,0 | 0,0 | –8 498 907,0 |
| GR | RD Guarantee (area related measures) | 2006 | Persistent weaknesses in IACS system. Deficiencies in control reports. Delayed performance of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –349 453,0 | 0,0 | –349 453,0 |
| GR | RD Guarantee (area related measures) | 2006 | Persistent weaknesses in IACS system. Deficiencies in control reports. Delayed performance of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –6 168 408,0 | 0,0 | –6 168 408,0 |
| GR | RD Guarantee new measures | 2005 | Persistent weaknesses in IACS system. Deficiencies in control reports. Delayed performance of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –690 219,0 | 0,0 | –690 219,0 |
| GR | RD Guarantee new measures | 2006 | Persistent weaknesses in IACS system. Deficiencies in control reports. Delayed performance of on-the-spot checks | flat-rate | 10,0 | EUR | –2 816 729,0 | 0,0 | –2 816 729,0 |
| Total GR | –132 422 793,63 | 0,0 | –132 422 793,63 | ||||||
| HU | Rural Development Guarantee | 2005 | Reimbursement due to double correction (under Commission Decision 2009/721/EC and recovery order GFO.09.025 concerning TRDI program 2004HU06GDO001) | one-off | HUF | 42 638 662,0 | 0,0 | 42 638 662,0 | |
| Total HU | 42 638 662,0 | 0,0 | 42 638 662,0 | ||||||
| IE | Dairy premium | 2005 | Non-application of aid reductions towards farmers lodging their aid applications after deadline | one-off | EUR | –367 181,29 | 0,0 | –367 181,29 | |
| IE | Financial audit — payment deadlines | 2008 | Non-respect of payment deadlines | one-off | EUR | –152 676,24 | –152 676,24 | 0,0 | |
| Total IE | –519 857,53 | –152 676,24 | –367 181,29 | ||||||
| IT | Financial audit — payment deadlines | 2008 | Ineligible expenditure | one-off | EUR | –9 345,0 | –9 345,0 | 0,0 | |
| IT | Financial audit — payment deadlines | 2008 | Non-respect of payment deadlines | one-off | EUR | –1 877 812,65 | –1 877 812,65 | 0,0 | |
| IT | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2007 | Ineligible expenditure | EUR | –18 750,0 | 0,0 | –18 750,0 | ||
| Total IT | –1 905 907,65 | –1 887 157,65 | –18 750,0 | ||||||
| LU | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | EUR | –1 273,9 | –1 273,9 | 0,0 | |
| LU | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2001 | Lack of adminitrative controls concerning retention period. Lack of on-the-spot controls. Inappropriate calculation of sanctions | one-off | EUR | –18 292,47 | 0,0 | –18 292,47 | |
| LU | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2002 | Lack of adminitrative controls concerning retention period. Lack of on-the-spot controls. Inappropriate calculation of sanctions | one-off | EUR | –3 973,52 | 0,0 | –3 973,52 | |
| LU | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2003 | Lack of adminitrative controls concerning retention period. Lack of on-the-spot controls. Inappropriate calculation of sanctions | one-off | EUR | –150 184,7 | 0,0 | –150 184,7 | |
| LU | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2004 | Lack of adminitrative controls concerning retention period. Lack of on-the-spot controls. Inappropriate calculation of sanctions | one-off | EUR | –190 950,23 | 0,0 | –190 950,23 | |
| Total LU | –364 674,82 | –1 273,9 | –363 400,92 | ||||||
| NL | Clearance of accounts | 2000-04 | Tested population errors | one-off | EUR | –481 542,94 | 0,0 | –481 542,94 | |
| NL | Clearance of accounts | 2004 | Tested population errors | one-off | EUR | –46 697,81 | 0,0 | –46 697,81 | |
| NL | Clearance of accounts | 2005 | Tested population errors | one-off | EUR | –402 695,0 | 0,0 | –402 695,0 | |
| NL | Export Refunds | 2003 | Insuficient number of sustitution checks performed | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –4 037 899,76 | 0,0 | –4 037 899,76 |
| NL | Export Refunds | 2003 | Insuficient number of sustitution checks performed | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –4 083 396,09 | 0,0 | –4 083 396,09 |
| NL | Export Refunds | 2004 | Insuficient number of sustitution checks performed | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –1 062 605,2 | 0,0 | –1 062 605,2 |
| NL | Export Refunds | 2004 | Insuficient number of sustitution checks performed | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –1 193 119,34 | 0,0 | –1 193 119,34 |
| NL | Export Refunds | 2005 | Insuficient number of sustitution checks performed | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –31 195,1 | 0,0 | –31 195,1 |
| NL | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2007 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | EUR | –914,7 | 0,0 | –914,7 | |
| NL | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Ineligible expenditure | one-off | EUR | –91 807,12 | –91 807,12 | 0,0 | |
| NL | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2004 | Weaknesses in the management of the herd registers and of the supporting documents | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –3 214 925,84 | 0,0 | –3 214 925,84 |
| NL | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2005 | Weaknesses in the management of the herd registers and of the supporting documents | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –3 559 908,74 | 0,0 | –3 559 908,74 |
| NL | Meat Premiums — Bovines | 2006 | Weaknesses in the management of the herd registers and of the supporting documents | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –19 171,1 | 0,0 | –19 171,1 |
| Total NL | –18 225 878,74 | –91 807,12 | –18 134 071,62 | ||||||
| F1PL | Direct payments | 2006 | Land parcel system not completely vectorised. Acceptance of ineligible land for payments. Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance. | One-off | PLN | – 87 534 475,32 | 0,0 | – 87 534 475,32 | |
| PL | Direct payments | 2006 | Land parcel system not completely vectorised. Acceptance of ineligible land for payments. Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance. | Flat rate | 5,0 | PLN | – 11 811 934,21 | 0,0 | – 11 811 934,21 |
| PL | Direct payments | 2007 | Land parcel system not completely vectorised. Acceptance of ineligible land for payments. Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance. | Flat rate | 5,0 | EUR | – 2 293 418,87 | 0,0 | – 2 293 418,87 |
| PL | Direct payments | 2007 | Land parcel system not completely vectorised. Acceptance of ineligible land for payments. Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance. | One-off | EUR | – 23 290 577,94 | 0,0 | – 23 290 577,94 | |
| PL | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | One-off | EUR | 0,0 | – 1 894 213,61 | 1 894 213,61 | |
| Total PL (PLN) | – 99 346 409,53 | 0,0 | – 99 346 409,53 | ||||||
| Total PL (EUR) | – 25 583 996,81 | – 1 894 213,61 | – 23 689 783,2 | ||||||
| SE | Cross Compliance | 2006 | Insufficient quantity and quality of key and ancillary controls | flat-rate | 5,0 | SEK | –9 218 825,98 | 0,0 | –9 218 825,98 |
| SE | Cross Compliance | 2007 | Insufficient quantity and quality of key and ancillary controls | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –2 137 710,17 | 0,0 | –2 137 710,17 |
| SE | Financial audit — payment deadlines | 2008 | Non-respect of payment deadlines | one-off | EUR | –35 584,38 | –35 584,38 | 0,0 | |
| SE | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | EUR | –44,84 | –44,84 | 0,0 | |
| Total SE (SEK) | –9 218 825,98 | 0,0 | –9 218 825,98 | ||||||
| Total SE (EUR) | –2 173 339,39 | –35 629,22 | –2 137 710,17 | ||||||
BUDGET ITEM 6500
| F2MS | Measure | FY | Reason for correction | Type | % | Currency | Amount | Deductions already made | Financial impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PL | Rural Development EAGGF Transitional Instrument (2000-2006) | 2005 | Land parcel system not completely vectorised. Acceptance of ineligible land for payments. Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance. | Flat rate | 5,0 | PLN | – 1 408 667,08 | 0,0 | – 1 408 667,08 |
| PL | Rural Development EAGGF Transitional Instrument (2000-2006) | 2006 | Land parcel system not completely vectorised. Acceptance of ineligible land for payments. Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance. | One-off | PLN | – 18 510 167,85 | 0,0 | – 18 510 167,85 | |
| PL | Rural Development EAGGF Transitional Instrument (2000-2006) | 2006 | Land parcel system not completely vectorised. Acceptance of ineligible land for payments. Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance. | Flat rate | 5,0 | PLN | – 69 151 379,37 | 0,0 | – 69 151 379,37 |
| PL | Rural Development EAGGF Transitional Instrument (2000-2006) | 2007 | Land parcel system not completely vectorised. Acceptance of ineligible land for payments. Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance. | One-off | PLN | – 12 943 389,24 | 0,0 | – 12 943 389,24 | |
| PL | Rural Development EAGGF Transitional Instrument (2000-2006) | 2007 | Land parcel system not completely vectorised. Acceptance of ineligible land for payments. Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates. Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance. | Flat rate | 5,0 | PLN | – 78 434 429,08 | 0,0 | – 78 434 429,08 |
| Total PL (PLN) | – 180 448 032,62 | 0,0 | – 180 448 032,62 | ||||||
| Grand total (PLN) | – 279 794 442,15 | 0,0 | – 279 794 442,15 |
| Grand total (EUR) | – 25 583 996,81 | – 1 894 213,61 | – 23 689 783,2 |
| MS | Programme | FY | Reason for correction | Type | % | Currency | Amount | Deductions already made | Financial impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SK | RD Guarantee (programme 2004 SK 06 GDO 001) | 2005 | Incorrect control procedure resulting in insufficient controls within chosen samples | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –1 249 561,0 | 0,0 | –1 249 561,0 |
| SK | RD Guarantee (programme 2004 SK 06 GDO 001) | 2006 | Incorrect control procedure resulting in insufficient controls within chosen samples | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –1 784 419,0 | 0,0 | –1 784 419,0 |
| SK | RD Guarantee (programme 2004 SK 06 GDO 001) | 2007 | Incorrect control procedure resulting in insufficient controls within chosen samples | flat-rate | 2,0 | EUR | –933,0 | 0,0 | –933,0 |
| Total SK | –3 034 913,0 | 0,0 | –3 034 913,0 | ||||||
BUDGET ITEM 6711
| MS | Programme | FY | Reason for correction | Type | % | Currency | Amount | Deductions already made | Financial impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB | Rural Development Programme 2007UK06RPO001 | 2007 | Weaknesses in key checks and in adminitrative controls Insufficient checks of GAEC criteria and cross-checks with animal database | flat-rate | 5,0 | EUR | –39 244,0 | 0,0 | –39 244,0 |
| Total GB | –39 244,0 | 0,0 | –39 244,0 | ||||||
BUDGET ITEM 05 07 01 07
| MS | Programme | FY | Reason for correction | Type | % | Currency | Amount | Deductions already made | Financial impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HU | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Ineligible expenditure | one-off | EUR | –5 622,81 | –5 622,81 | 0,0 | |
| HU | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2008 | Overshooting of financial ceilings | one-off | EUR | 21 511,01 | –5 432,55 | 26 943,56 | |
| Total HU (EUR) | 15 888,2 | –11 055,36 | 26 943,56 | ||||||
| PT | Direct Payments | 2004 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-50/07 | one-off | EUR | 1 983 698,0 | 0,0 | 1 983 698,0 | |
| PT | Flax — Production Aid | 2001 | Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-183/06 | one-off | EUR | 3 135 348,71 | 3 135 348,71 | ||
| Total PT | 5 119 046,71 | 0,0 | 5 119 046,71 | ||||||
Annotations
Textual amendments
- F1
- F2