Division 4 CALCULATION EXAMPLE
United Kingdom
The table below show an example for a hypothetical Member State located in average climate conditions, which has 3 different heat pump technologies installed.
| The Member State in this hypothetical example did a survey of installed reversible air to air heat pumps and concluded that the equivalent of 48 % of the installed reversible heat pump capacity were used fully for heating, instead of the 40 % assumed in these guidelines. The HHP value is therefore adjusted up from 710 hours, which assumes 40 % and set out in Table 1, to 852 hours, which is representative for the estimated 48 %. | ||||||
| Air to air(reversible) | Water to water | Exhaust Air to water | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calculation | Description | Variable | Unit | |||
| Capacity of heat pumps installed | Prated | GW | 255 | 74 | 215 | |
| of which the SPF is above the minimum threshold | Prated | GW | 150 | 70 | 120 | |
| Equivalent full load hours of operation | HHP | h | 852f1 | X12 070 | 660 | |
| Estimated total usable heat delivered by heat pumps | Qusable | GWh | 127 800 | 144 900 | 79 200 | |
| the estimated average seasonal performance factor | SPF | 2,6 | 3,5 | 2,6 | ||
| Amount of renewable energy supplied per heat pump technology | ERES | GWh | 78 646 | 103 500 | 48 738 | |
| Total amount of renewable energy supplied by heat pumps | ERES | GWh | 230 885 | |||
Annotations
Editorial notes
Footnotes
- f1
-
The Member State in this hypothetical example did a survey of installed reversible air to air heat pumps and concluded that the equivalent of 48 % of the installed reversible heat pump capacity were used fully for heating, instead of the 40 % assumed in these guidelines. The HHP value is therefore adjusted up from 710 hours, which assumes 40 % and set out in Table 1, to 852 hours, which is representative for the estimated 48 %.