OpenLegislation

Appendix

United Kingdom

Original text. Later amendments are not shown.

Description and justification of the standard scales of unit costs and lump sums used to reimburse the JAP

The purpose of this appendix is to facilitate the work of the Commission in the assessment of the standard scales of unit costs (unit costs) and lump sums used to reimburse the outputs and results of the JAP. Therefore it should cover only the indicators from tables I.1.1 and I.1.2. It has to be completed indicator by indicator.f1

A.1.

Indicator (see I.1.1 and I.1.2)

A.1.1.

Name

A.1.2.1.

Unit of measurement for indicator

A.1.2.2.

Unit of measurement for milestone/target (where relevant)

A.1.3.

Definition

A.1.4.

Source of data (nature of the supporting documents, who produces (generates), collects and records the data, where are they stored, frequency of collection/cut-off dates, validation…)

A.1.5.

Verification of data (who will verify, frequency of verification, method of verification):

  • verification of units attained

  • verification of the quality level attained

A.1.6.

Where relevant, please explain how the verification of the respect of public procurement procedures and state aid will be ensured

A.1.7.

Possible perverse incentives or problems due to this indicator, how they could be mitigated, level of risk

A.1.8.

Reimbursement based on

( ) lump sum ( ) standard scale of unit cost

A.1.9.

Amount (in national currency) of one unit or lump sum

A.1.10

Additional amount (in national currency) from update method (if any)

A.1.11.

Detailed description of the update method (if any)

A.1.12.

Legal basis in the ESI Funds legislative framework used to justify the unit cost/lump sum

A.2.

Calculation of the standard scale of unit costs and lump sums

A.2.1.

Please specify why the proposed method and calculation is relevant for the type of projects that will be supported by the JAP:

A.2.2.

Please specify how the calculations to reach the amounts in A.1.9 and A.1.10 have been carried out, including in particular the assumptions made in terms of quality, or quantities. Where relevant, statistical evidence, benchmarks should be used and attached to this appendix under a format directly reusable by the Commission.

A.2.3.

Please also explain, where relevant:

  • how revenue has been/will be taken into account,

  • that only eligible costs have been taken into account in the calculation,

  • the level of cross-financing (with reference to Article 98(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013).

Annotations

Footnotes

f1

The appendix will be uploaded as a separate document in SFC2014.

Notes on Annex IV

Footnotes

f1

Legend for the characteristics of fields:

  • type: N = Number, D = Date, S = String, C = Checkbox, P = Percentage

  • input: M = Manual, S = Selection, G = Generated by system

  • maxlength = Maximum number of characters including spaces