OpenLegislation

Commission Decision of 30 May 2002 concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the control-command and signalling subsystem of the trans-European high-speed rail system referred to in Article 6(1) of Council Directive 96/48/EC (notified under document number C(2002) 1947) (Text with EEA relevance) (2002/731/EC)

EU Decision 2002/731 · Adopted 30 May 2002 · Extends to United Kingdom

Original text. legislation.gov.uk does not revise this item, so later amendments are not shown here. Changes made to it are listed under each provision when known.

Commission Decision

of 30 May 2002

concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the control-command and signalling subsystem of the trans-European high-speed rail system referred to in Article 6(1) of Council Directive 96/48/EC

(notified under document number C(2002) 1947)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2002/731/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 96/48/EC of 23 July 1996 on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail networkf1, and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1)

In accordance with Article 2(c) of Directive 96/48/EC, the trans-European high-speed rail system is subdivided into structural or functional subsystems. These subsystems are described in Annex II to the Directive.

(2)

In accordance with Article 5(1) of the Directive, each of the subsystems shall be covered by a technical specification for interoperability (TSI).

(3)

In accordance with Article 6(1) of the Directive, draft TSIs shall be drawn up by the joint representative body.

(4)

The Committee set up pursuant to Article 21 of Directive 96/48/EC has appointed the European Association for Railway Interoperability (AEIF) as the joint representative body in accordance with Article 2(h) of the Directive.

(5)

The AEIF has been given a mandate to draw up a draft TSI for the control-command and signalling subsystem in accordance with Article 6(1) of the Directive. This mandate was established in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 21(2) of the Directive.

(6)

The AEIF has drawn up the draft TSI, together with an introductory report containing a cost-benefit analysis as provided for in Article 6(3) of the Directive.

(7)

The draft TSI has been examined by the representatives of the Member States, in the framework of the Committee set up by the Directive, in the light of the introductory report.

(8)

As specified in Article 1 of Directive 96/48/EC, the conditions for achieving interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system concern the design, construction, upgrading and operation of the infrastructures and rolling stock contributing to the functioning of the system to be put into service after the date of entry into force of the Directive. With regard to the infrastructures and rolling stock already in service at the time of entry into force of this TSI, the TSI should be applied from the time when work is envisaged on these infrastructures and rolling stock. However, the degree to which the TSI is applied will vary according to the scope and extent of the works foreseen and the costs and the benefits generated by the intended applications. In order for such partial works to concur into achieving full interoperability, they need to be underpinned by a coherent implementation strategy. In this context, a distinction should be made between upgrading, renewal and maintenance-related replacement.

(9)

It is recognised that Directive 96/48/EC and the TSIs do not apply to renewals or maintenance-related replacement. It is desirable however that the TSIs should apply to renewals, as will be the case for the TSIs for the conventional rail system under Commission Directive 2001/16/ECf2. In the absence of a mandatory requirement and taking into account the extent of the renewal work, Member States are encouraged, where they are able to do so, to apply the TSIs to renewals and maintenance-related replacement.

(10)

Existing high-speed lines and rolling stock are already equipped with control-command and signalling systems that meet the essential requirements of Directive 96/48/EC. Such systems were developed and implemented according to national rules. In order to allow the operation of interoperable services, it is necessary to develop interfaces between those existing systems and new TSI compatible equipment. Basic information concerning those existing systems is provided in Annex B to the attached TSI. Given that verification of interoperability has to be established by reference to the TSIs, in accordance with Article 16(2) of Directive 96/48/EC, it is necessary, during the transition period between the publication of this Decision and the full implementation of the TSI attached, to lay down the conditions to be complied with in addition to the attached TSI. For these reasons it is necessary that each Member State informs the other Member States and the Commission, for each one of the systems mentioned in Annex B, of the technical rules in use for achieving interoperability and meeting the essential requirements of Directive 96/48/EC. In addition, those rules being national, it is necessary that each Member State informs the other Member States and the Commission of the bodies it appoints for carrying out the procedure for the assessment of conformity or suitability for use as well as the checking procedure in use for verifying the interoperability of subsystems within the meaning of Article 16(2) of Directive 96/48/EC. Member States shall apply, as far as possible, the principles and criteria provided for in Directive 96/48/EC for the implementation of Article 16(2) in the case of those national rules. As to the bodies in charge of those procedures, Member States will make use, as far as possible, of bodies notified under Article 20 of Directive 96/48/EC. The Commission will carry out an analysis of this information (national rules, procedures, bodies in charge of implementing procedures, duration of these procedures) and, where appropriate, will discuss with the Committee the necessity of any measure to be taken.

(11)

The TSI, which is the subject of this Decision, does not impose the use of specific technologies or technical solutions except where this is strictly necessary for the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail network.

(12)

The TSI, which is the subject of this Decision, is based on best available expert knowledge at the time of preparation of the corresponding draft. Developments in technology or social requirements may make it necessary to amend or supplement this TSI. Where appropriate, a review or updating procedure will be initiated in accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 96/48/EC.

(13)

In some cases, the TSI, which is the subject of this Decision, allows a choice between different solutions, making it possible to apply definitive or transitional interoperable solutions that are compatible with the existing situation. In addition, Directive 96/48/EC provides for special implementing provisions in certain specific cases. Furthermore, in the cases provided for in Article 7 of the Directive Member States must be allowed not to apply certain technical specifications. It is therefore necessary that the Member States ensure that an infrastructure register and a rolling stock register are published and updated each year. These registers will set out the main characteristics of the national infrastructure and rolling stock (e.g. the basic parameters) and their concordance with the characteristics prescribed by the applicable TSIs. To this end, the TSI, which is the subject of this Decision, indicates precisely which information must appear in the registers.

(14)

The application of the TSI which is the subject of this Decision must take into account specific criteria relating to technical and operational compatibility between the infrastructures and the rolling stock to be placed in service and the network into which they are to be integrated. These compatibility requirements entail a complex technical and economical analysis that is to be done on a case-by-case basis. The analysis should take into account:

  • the interfaces between the different subsystems referred to in Directive 96/48/EC,

  • the different categories of lines and rolling stock referred to in that Directive, and

  • the technical and operational environments of the existing network.

That is why it is essential to establish a strategy for the implementation of the TSI which is the subject of this Decision, which should indicate the technical stages to move from the present network conditions to a situation where the network is interoperable.

(15)

The target system described in the attached TSI builds upon computer-based technology with a life expectancy significantly lower than current traditional railway signalling and telecommunication facilities. As such, they call for a proactive rather than reactive deployment strategy to avoid potential system obsolescence prior to system deployment reaching maturity levels. In addition, the adoption of a too fragmented deployment throughout the European rail network would give rise to major costs and operational overheads. The development of a coherent trans-European implementation plan for the target system would contribute to a harmonious development of the whole of the trans-European rail network in compliance with the EU strategy for the TEN-transport network. Such a plan should build upon the corresponding national implementation plans and should provide an appropriate knowledge base for decision support by the different stakeholders, in particular, by the Commission in the allocation of financial support to railway projects. The Commission will coordinate the development of such a plan, in accordance with Article 155(2) of the Treaty establishing the European Community.

(16)

The provisions of this Decision are in conformity with the opinion of the Committee set up by Directive 96/48/EC,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Annotations to the whole text

Footnotes

f1

OJ L 235, 17.9.1996, p. 6.

f2

OJ L 110, 20.4.2001, p. 1.

Contents

  1. 1Article 1
  2. 2Article 2
  3. 3Article 3
  4. 4Article 4
  5. 5Article 5
  6. 6Article 6
  7. 7Article 7
  8. Annex: TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR INTEROPERABILITY RELATING TO THE CONTROL-COMMAND AND SIGNALLING SUBSYSTEM
  9. INTRODUCTION
  10. 1.1TECHNICAL SCOPE
  11. 1.2GEOGRAPHICAL SCOPE
  12. 1.3CONTENT OF THIS TSI
  13. SUBSYSTEM DEFINITION AND SCOPE
  14. 2.1GENERAL
  15. 2.2OVERVIEW
  16. 2.2.1INTEROPERABILITY
  17. 2.2.2CLASSES OF CONTROL-COMMAND INTERFACES BETWEEN TRACK AND TRAIN
  18. 2.2.3LEVELS OF APPLICATION
  19. 2.2.4NETWORK BORDERS
  20. THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTROL-COMMAND SUBSYSTEM
  21. 3.1GENERAL
  22. 3.2SPECIFIC ASPECTS FOR THE CONTROL-COMMAND SUBSYSTEM
  23. 3.2.1SAFETY
  24. 3.2.2RELIABILITY AND AVAILABILITY
  25. 3.2.3HEALTH
  26. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
  27. 3.2.4.1Division 3.2.4.1
  28. 3.2.4.2Division 3.2.4.2
  29. 3.2.4.3The control-command systems shall be subject to the European legislation in force controlling the limits to the emission of and the susceptibility to electromagnetic interference along the boundaries of railway property.
  30. 3.2.5TECHNICAL COMPATIBILITY
  31. Engineering compatibility
  32. 3.2.5.1.1Physical environmental conditions
  33. 3.2.5.1.2Electromagnetic compatibility
  34. 3.2.5.2Control-command compatibility
  35. 4CHARACTERISATION OF THE SUBSYSTEM
  36. BASIC PARAMETERS OF THE SUBSYSTEM — CLASS A EQUIPMENT
  37. 4.1.1BASIC PARAMETERS OF THE SUBSYSTEM: INTERNAL FUNCTIONS
  38. 4.1.2BASIC PARAMETERS OF THE SUBSYSTEM: INTERNAL INTERFACE
  39. 4.1.2.1Interface between on-board and trackside assembly
  40. 4.1.2.2Interfaces between on-board interoperability constituents essential to interoperability
  41. 4.1.2.3Interfaces between trackside interoperability constituents essential to interoperability
  42. 4.1.2.4Key management
  43. 4.1.3INTERFACES TO OTHER CC EQUIPMENT
  44. 4.2INTERFACES OF THE SUBSYSTEM TO OTHER SUBSYSTEMS
  45. 4.2.1THE EXTERNAL CLASS A INTERFACES REQUIRED FOR INTEROPERABILITY
  46. 4.2.1.1The operation interfaces
  47. 4.2.1.2Rolling stock interfaces
  48. 4.2.1.3Infrastructure interfaces
  49. 4.2.2THE EXTERNAL CLASS B INTERFACES REQUIRED FOR INTEROPERABILITY
  50. 4.3SPECIFIED PERFORMANCE FOR INTEROPERABILITY
  51. 4.4SPECIAL CASES: APPLICATION MODALITIES
  52. 5INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS
  53. 5.1CONTROL-COMMAND INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS
  54. 5.2GROUPING OF INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS
  55. ASSESSMENT OF CONFORMITY AND/OR SUITABILITY FOR USE AND EC DECLARATION OF VERIFICATION
  56. INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS
  57. 6.1.1CONFORMITY AND SUITABILITY FOR USE ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES (MODULES)
  58. 6.1.1.1The specific transmission module (STM)
  59. 6.1.1.2EC declaration of conformity
  60. APPLICATION OF MODULES
  61. 6.1.2.1Assessment of conformity
  62. 6.1.2.2Definition of assessment procedures
  63. 6.2CONTROL-COMMAND SUBSYSTEM
  64. Trackside assembly functional integration verification:
  65. Assessment procedures (modules)
  66. 6.2.1APPLICATION OF MODULES
  67. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TSI CONTROL-COMMAND
  68. 7.1PRINCIPLES AND DEFINITIONS
  69. SPECIFIC ISSUES OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TSI CONTROL-COMMAND
  70. INTRODUCTION
  71. 7.2.1.1General migration criteria
  72. 7.2.1.2Use of class B systems for interoperable trains
  73. 7.2.1.3Compatibility with other trains
  74. 7.2.1.4Registers
  75. 7.2.1.5Timing criteria
  76. Trackside installations
  77. On-board installations
  78. Legacy systems:
  79. 7.2.1.6Competition criteria
  80. 7.2.2IMPLEMENTATION: INFRASTRUCTURE (STATIONARY EQUIPMENT)
  81. 7.2.2.1Lines to be constructed
  82. 7.2.2.2Lines to be upgraded (re-signalled)
  83. 7.2.2.3Existing lines
  84. 7.2.2.4Registers of infrastructure (TEN HS) Repealed
  85. 7.2.3IMPLEMENTATION: ROLLING STOCK (ON-BOARD EQUIPMENT)
  86. 7.2.3.1Registers of rolling stock (TEN HS) Repealed
  87. 7.2.4CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH ‘O’ FUNCTIONS ARE REQUIRED
  88. 7.2.5CHANGE CONTROL PROCEDURE
  89. ANNEX AAppendix ANNEX A
  90. ANNEX BCLASS B
  91. ANNEX CLINE-SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS AND TRAIN-SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS FOR LINES AND TRAINS DECLARED AS INTEROPERABLE, AND RESULTING REQUIREMENTS Repealed
  92. ANNEX DAppendix ANNEX D
  93. ANNEX EMODULES FOR EC DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY AND EC DECLARATION OF SUBSYSTEM VERIFICATION