Directive 2014/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of measuring instruments (recast) (Text with EEA relevance)
EU Directive 2014/32 · Adopted 26 February 2014 · Extends to United Kingdom
Directive 2014/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 26 February 2014
on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of measuring instruments (recast)
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committeef1,
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative proceduref2,
Whereas:
(1)
(2)
Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of productsf5 lays down rules on the accreditation of conformity assessment bodies, provides a framework for the market surveillance of products and for controls on products from third countries, and lays down the general principles of the CE marking.
(3)
Decision No 768/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 on a common framework for the marketing of productsf6 lays down common principles and reference provisions intended to apply across sectoral legislation in order to provide a coherent basis for revision or recasts of that legislation. Directive 2004/22/EC should be adapted to that Decision.
(4)
This Directive covers measuring instruments which are new to the Union market when they are placed on the market; that is to say they are either new measuring instruments made by a manufacturer established in the Union or measuring instruments, whether new or second-hand, imported from a third country.
(5)
Correct and traceable measuring instruments can be used for a variety of measurement tasks. Those responding to reasons of public interest, public health, safety and order, protection of the environment and the consumer, of levying taxes and duties and of fair trading, which directly and indirectly affect the daily life of citizens in many ways, may require the use of legally controlled measuring instruments.
(6)
This Directive should apply to all forms of supply, including distance selling.
(7)
Legal metrological control should not lead to barriers to the free movement of measuring instruments. The applicable provisions should be the same in all Member States and proof of conformity should be accepted throughout the Union.
(8)
Legal metrological control requires conformity with specified performance requirements. The performance requirements that the measuring instruments must meet should provide a high level of protection. The conformity assessment should provide a high level of confidence.
(9)
Member States should as a general rule prescribe legal metrological control. Where legal metrological control is prescribed, only measuring instruments complying with common performance requirements should be used.
(10)
The principle of optionality introduced by Directive 2004/22/EC allows Member States to exercise their right to decide whether or not to prescribe the use of the measuring instruments covered by this Directive.
(11)
National specifications concerning the appropriate national requirements for use should not interfere with the provisions of this Directive on ‘putting into use’.
(12)
The performance of certain measuring instruments is particularly sensitive to the environment, in particular the electromagnetic environment. Immunity of measuring instruments to electromagnetic interference should form an integral part of this Directive and the immunity requirements of Directive 2004/108/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibilityf7 should therefore not apply.
(13)
In order to ensure the free circulation of measuring instruments in the Union, Member States should not impede the placing on the market and/or putting into use of measuring instruments that carry the CE marking and supplementary metrology marking in accordance with the provisions of this Directive.
(14)
Member States should take appropriate action to prevent non-complying measuring instruments from being placed on the market and/or put into use. Adequate cooperation between the competent authorities of the Member States is therefore necessary to ensure a Union-wide effect of this objective.
(15)
Economic operators should be responsible for the compliance of measuring instruments with this Directive, in relation to their respective roles in the supply chain, so as to ensure a high level of protection of the aspects of public interest covered by this Directive, and also to guarantee fair competition on the Union market.
(16)
All economic operators intervening in the supply and distribution chain should take appropriate measures to ensure that they make available on the market only measuring instruments which are in conformity with this Directive. It is necessary to provide for a clear and proportionate distribution of obligations which correspond to the role of each economic operator in the supply and distribution chain.
(17)
In order to facilitate communication between economic operators, market surveillance authorities and consumers, Member States should encourage economic operators to include a website address in addition to the postal address.
(18)
The manufacturer, having detailed knowledge of the design and production process, is best placed to carry out the conformity assessment procedure. Conformity assessment should therefore remain solely the obligation of the manufacturer.
(19)
It is necessary to ensure that measuring instruments from third countries entering the Union market comply with this Directive, and in particular that the appropriate conformity assessment procedures have been carried out by manufacturers with regard to those measuring instruments. Provision should therefore be made for importers to make sure that the measuring instruments they place on the market comply with the requirements of this Directive and that they do not place on the market measuring instruments which do not comply with such requirements or present a risk. Provision should also be made for importers to make sure that conformity assessment procedures have been carried out and that marking of measuring instruments and documentation drawn up by manufacturers are available for inspection by the competent national authorities.
(20)
When placing a measuring instrument on the market, every importer should indicate on the measuring instrument his name, registered trade name or registered trade mark and the postal address at which he can be contacted. Exceptions should be provided for in cases where the size or nature of the measuring instrument does not allow it. This includes cases where the importer would have to open the packaging to put his name and address on the measuring instrument.
(21)
The distributor makes a measuring instrument available on the market after it has been placed on the market by the manufacturer or the importer. The distributor should act with due care to ensure that its handling of the measuring instrument does not adversely affect the compliance of that instrument with this Directive.
(22)
Any economic operator that either places a measuring instrument on the market under his own name or trade mark or modifies a measuring instrument in such a way that compliance with of this Directive may be affected should be considered to be the manufacturer and should assume the obligations of the manufacturer.
(23)
Distributors and importers, being close to the market place, should be involved in market surveillance tasks carried out by competent national authorities, and should be prepared to participate actively, providing those authorities with all necessary information relating to the measuring instrument concerned.
(24)
Ensuring traceability of a measuring instrument throughout the whole supply chain helps to make market surveillance simpler and more efficient. An efficient traceability system facilitates market surveillance authorities’ task of tracing economic operators who made non-compliant measuring instruments available on the market. When keeping the information required under this Directive for the identification of other economic operators, economic operators should not be required to update such information in respect of other economic operators who have either supplied them with a measuring instrument or to whom they have supplied a measuring instrument.
(25)
This Directive should be limited to the expression of essential requirements that do not impede technical progress, preferably performance requirements. In order to facilitate conformity assessment with those requirements it is necessary to provide for a presumption of conformity for measuring instruments which are in conformity with harmonised standards that are adopted in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on European Standardisationf8 for the purpose of expressing detailed technical specifications of those requirements.
(26)
Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 provides for a procedure for objections to harmonised standards where those standards do not entirely satisfy the requirements of this Directive.
(27)
The technical and performance specifications of internationally agreed normative documents may also comply, in part or in full, with the essential requirements laid down by this Directive. In those cases the use of these internationally agreed normative documents should be allowed as an alternative to the use of harmonised standards and, under specific conditions, give rise to a presumption of conformity.
(28)
Conformity with the essential requirements laid down by this Directive can also be provided by specifications that are not supplied by a harmonised standard or an internationally agreed normative document. The use of harmonised standards or internationally agreed normative documents should therefore be optional.
(29)
In order to enable economic operators to demonstrate and the competent authorities to ensure that measuring instruments made available on the market comply with the essential requirements, it is necessary to provide for conformity assessment procedures. Decision No 768/2008/EC establishes modules for conformity assessment procedures, from the least to the most stringent, in proportion to the level of risk involved and the level of safety required. In order to ensure inter-sectoral coherence and to avoid ad-hoc variants, conformity assessment procedures should be chosen from among those modules. However, it is necessary to adapt those modules in order to reflect specific aspects of metrological control.
(30)
The conformity assessment of sub-assemblies should be carried out in accordance with this Directive. If sub-assemblies are made available on the market separately and independently of an instrument, their conformity assessment should be undertaken independently of the instrument concerned.
(31)
The state of the art in measurement technology is subject to constant evolution which may lead to changes in the needs for conformity assessments. Therefore, for each category of measuring instrument and, where appropriate, sub-assemblies, there should be an appropriate procedure or a choice between different procedures of equivalent stringency.
(32)
Manufacturers should draw up an EU declaration of conformity to provide information required under this Directive on the conformity of a measuring instrument with this Directive and with other relevant Union harmonisation legislation.
(33)
To ensure effective access to information for market surveillance purposes, the information required to identify all applicable Union acts should be available in a single EU declaration of conformity. In order to reduce the administrative burden on economic operators, that single EU declaration of conformity may be a dossier made up of relevant individual declarations of conformity.
(34)
The CE marking and the supplementary metrology marking, indicating the conformity of a measuring instrument, are the visible consequence of a whole process comprising conformity assessment in a broad sense. General principles governing the CE marking and its relationship to other markings are set out in Regulation (EC) No 765/2008. Rules governing the affixing of the CE marking and the supplementary metrology marking should be laid down in this Directive.
(35)
In order to take account of differences in climatic conditions or of different levels of consumer protection that may apply at national level, it is necessary to establish environmental or accuracy classes as essential requirements.
(36)
Certain conformity assessment procedures set out in this Directive require the intervention of conformity assessment bodies, which are notified by the Member States to the Commission.
(37)
Experience has shown that the criteria set out in Directive 2004/22/EC that conformity assessment bodies have to fulfil to be notified to the Commission are not sufficient to ensure a uniformly high level of performance of notified bodies throughout the Union. It is, however, essential that all notified bodies perform their functions to the same level and under conditions of fair competition. That requires the setting of obligatory requirements for conformity assessment bodies wishing to be notified in order to provide conformity assessment services.
(38)
If a conformity assessment body demonstrates conformity with the criteria laid down in harmonised standards it should be presumed to comply with the corresponding requirements set out in this Directive.
(39)
In order to ensure a consistent level of quality in the performance of conformity assessment of measuring instruments, it is also necessary to set requirements for notifying authorities and other bodies involved in the assessment, notification and monitoring of notified bodies.
(40)
The system set out in this Directive should be complemented by the accreditation system provided for in Regulation (EC) No 765/2008. Since accreditation is an essential means of verifying the competence of conformity assessment bodies, it should also be used for the purposes of notification.
(41)
Transparent accreditation as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 765/2008, ensuring the necessary level of confidence in certificates of conformity, should be considered by the national public authorities throughout the Union as the preferred means of demonstrating the technical competence of conformity assessment bodies. However, national authorities may consider that they possess the appropriate means of carrying out that evaluation themselves. In such cases, in order to ensure the appropriate level of credibility of evaluations carried out by other national authorities, they should provide the Commission and the other Member States with the necessary documentary evidence demonstrating the compliance of the conformity assessment bodies evaluated with the relevant regulatory requirements.
(42)
Conformity assessment bodies frequently subcontract parts of their activities linked to the assessment of conformity or have recourse to a subsidiary. In order to safeguard the level of protection required for the measuring instruments to be placed on the market, it is essential that conformity assessment subcontractors and subsidiaries fulfil the same requirements as notified bodies in relation to the performance of conformity assessment tasks. Therefore, it is important that the assessment of the competence and the performance of bodies to be notified and the monitoring of bodies already notified cover also activities carried out by subcontractors and subsidiaries.
(43)
It is necessary to increase the efficiency and transparency of the notification procedure and, in particular, to adapt it to new technologies so as to enable online notification.
(44)
Since notified bodies may offer their services throughout the Union, it is appropriate to give the other Member States and the Commission the opportunity to raise objections concerning a notified body. It is therefore important to provide for a period during which any doubts or concerns as to the competence of conformity assessment bodies can be clarified before they start operating as notified bodies.
(45)
In the interests of competitiveness, it is crucial that notified bodies apply the conformity assessment procedures without creating unnecessary burdens for economic operators. For the same reason, and to ensure equal treatment of economic operators, consistency in the technical application of the conformity assessment procedures needs to be ensured. That can best be achieved through appropriate coordination and cooperation between notified bodies.
(46)
In order to ensure legal certainty, it is necessary to clarify that rules on Union market surveillance and control of products entering the Union market provided for in Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 apply to measuring instruments covered by this Directive. This Directive should not prevent Member States from choosing the competent authorities to carry out those tasks.
(47)
Member States should take all appropriate measures to ensure that measuring instruments may be placed on the market only if, when properly stored and used for their intended purpose, or under conditions of use which can be reasonably foreseen, they do not endanger the health and safety of persons. Measuring instruments should be considered as non-compliant with the essential requirements laid down in this Directive only under conditions of use which can be reasonably foreseen, that is when such use could result from lawful and readily predictable human behaviour.
(48)
Directive 2004/22/EC already provides for a safeguard procedure allowing the Commission to examine the justification for a measure taken by a Member State against measuring instruments it considers to be non-compliant. In order to increase transparency and to reduce processing time, it is necessary to improve the existing safeguard procedure, with the view to making it more efficient and drawing on the expertise available in Member States.
(49)
The existing system should be supplemented by a procedure under which interested parties are informed of measures intended to be taken with regard to measuring instruments presenting a risk to aspects of public interest protection covered by this Directive. It should also allow market surveillance authorities, in cooperation with the relevant economic operators, to act at an early stage in respect of such measuring instruments.
(50)
Where the Member States and the Commission agree as to the justification of a measure taken by a Member State, no further involvement of the Commission should be required, except where non-compliance can be attributed to shortcomings of a harmonised standard or a normative document.
(51)
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Directive, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powersf9.
(52)
The advisory procedure should be used for the adoption of implementing acts requesting the notifying Member State to take the necessary corrective measures in respect of notified bodies that do not meet or no longer meet the requirements for their notification.
(53)
The advisory procedure should also be used for the adoption of implementing acts with respect to the objections to the internationally agreed normative documents whose references have not yet been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, given that the relevant document has not yet led to the presumption of conformity with the applicable essential requirements.
(54)
The examination procedure should be used for the adoption of implementing acts with respect to the objections to the internationally agreed normative documents whose references were already published in the Official Journal of the European Union and which a Member State or the Commission considers justified, given that such acts could have consequences on the presumption of conformity with the applicable essential requirements.
(55)
The examination procedure should also be used for the adoption of implementing acts with respect to compliant measuring instruments which present a risk to the health or safety of persons or to other aspects of public interest protection.
(56)
In line with established practice, the committee set up by this Directive can play a useful role in examining matters concerning the application of this Directive raised either by its chair or by a representative of a Member State in accordance with its rules of procedure.
(57)
When matters relating to this Directive, other than its implementation or infringements, are being examined, i.e. in a Commission expert group, the European Parliament should in line with existing practice receive full information and documentation and, where appropriate, an invitation to attend such meetings.
(58)
The Commission should, by means of implementing acts and, given their special nature, acting without the application of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011, determine whether measures taken by Member States in respect of non-compliant measuring instruments are justified or not.
(59)
In order to take into account the developments in the measurement technology, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amendments to the instrument-specific Annexes. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
(60)
Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of national law adopted pursuant to this Directive and ensure that those rules are enforced. The penalties provided for should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
(61)
It is necessary to provide for reasonable transitional arrangements that allow the making available on the market and putting into use, without the need to comply with further product requirements, of measuring instruments that have already been placed on the market in accordance with Directive 2004/22/EC before the date of application of national measures transposing this Directive. Distributors should therefore be able to supply measuring instruments that have been placed on the market, namely stock that is already in the distribution chain, before the date of application of national measures transposing this Directive.
(62)
Since the objective of this Directive, namely to ensure that measuring instruments on the market fulfil the requirements providing for a high level of protection of the public interests covered by this Directive while guaranteeing the functioning of the internal market cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
(63)
The obligation to transpose this Directive into national law should be confined to those provisions which represent a substantive amendment as compared to the earlier Directive. The obligation to transpose the provisions which are unchanged arises under the earlier Directive.
(64)
This Directive should be without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States relating to the time-limits for transposition into national law and the dates of application of the Directives set out in Annex XIV, Part B,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
Annotations to the whole text
Footnotes
- f1
- f2
-
Position of the European Parliament of 5 February 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 20 February 2014.
- f3
- f4
-
See Annex XIV, Part A.
- f5
- f6
- f7
- f8
- f9
Contents
- Chapter 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS
- 1Subject matter
- 2Scope
- 3Optionality
- 4Definitions
- 5Applicability to sub-assemblies
- 6Essential requirements
- 7Making available on the market and putting into use
- Chapter 2: OBLIGATIONS OF ECONOMIC OPERATORS
- 8Obligations of manufacturers
- 9Authorised representatives
- 10Obligations of importers
- 11Obligations of distributors
- 12Cases in which obligations of manufacturers apply to importers and distributors
- 13Identification of economic operators
- Chapter 3: CONFORMITY OF MEASURING INSTRUMENTS
- 14Presumption of conformity of measuring instruments
- 15Publication of the references of normative documents
- 16Withdrawal of the references of normative documents
- 17Conformity assessment procedures
- 18Technical documentation
- 19EU declaration of conformity
- 20Conformity marking
- 21General principles of the CE marking and of the supplementary metrology marking
- 22Rules and conditions for affixing the CE marking and the supplementary metrology marking
- Chapter 4: NOTIFICATION OF CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES
- 23Notification
- 24Notifying authorities
- 25Requirements relating to notifying authorities
- 26Information obligation on notifying authorities
- 27Requirements relating to notified bodies
- 28Presumption of conformity of notified bodies
- 29Subsidiaries of and subcontracting by notified bodies
- 30Accredited in-house bodies
- 31Application for notification
- 32Notification procedure
- 33Identification numbers and lists of notified bodies
- 34Changes to notifications
- 35Challenge of the competence of notified bodies
- 36Operational obligations of notified bodies
- 37Appeal against decisions of notified bodies
- 38Information obligation on notified bodies
- 39Exchange of experience
- 40Coordination of notified bodies
- Chapter 5: UNION MARKET SURVEILLANCE, CONTROL OF MEASURING INSTRUMENTS ENTERING THE UNION MARKET AND UNION SAFEGUARD PROCEDURE
- 41Union market surveillance and control of measuring instruments entering the Union market
- 42Procedure for dealing with measuring instruments presenting a risk at national level
- 43Union safeguard procedure
- 44Compliant measuring instruments which present a risk
- 45Formal non-compliance
- Chapter 6: COMMITTEE AND DELEGATED ACTS
- 46Committee procedure
- 47Amendments of Annexes
- 48Exercise of the delegation
- Chapter 7: TRANSITIONAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS
- 49Penalties
- 50Transitional provisions
- 51Transposition
- 52Repeal
- 53Entry into force and application
- 54Addressees
- Annex I
- ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS
- DEFINITIONS
- ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS
- Allowable Errors
- 1.1Division 1.1
- 1.2Division 1.2
- 1.3Division 1.3
- 1.3.1Climatic environments
- 1.3.2Division 1.3.2
- 1.3.3Division 1.3.3
- 1.3.4Division 1.3.4
- 1.4Division 1.4
- 1.4.1Basic rules for testing and the determination of errors
- 1.4.2Ambient humidity
- 2Reproducibility
- 3Repeatability
- 4Discrimination and Sensitivity
- 5Durability
- 6Reliability
- Suitability
- 7.1Division 7.1
- 7.2Division 7.2
- 7.3Division 7.3
- 7.4Division 7.4
- 7.5Division 7.5
- 7.6A measuring instrument shall be designed so as to allow the control of the measuring tasks after the instrument has been placed on the market and put into use. If necessary, special equipment or software for this control shall be part of the instrument. The test procedure shall be described in the operation manual.
- Protection against corruption
- 8.1Division 8.1
- 8.2Division 8.2
- 8.3Software that is critical for metrological characteristics shall be identified as such and shall be secured.
- 8.4Division 8.4
- 8.5Division 8.5
- Information to be borne by and to accompany the instrument
- 9.1A measuring instrument shall bear the following inscriptions:
- 9.2Division 9.2
- 9.3The instrument shall be accompanied by information on its operation, unless the simplicity of the measuring instrument makes this unnecessary. Information shall be easily understandable and shall include where relevant:
- 9.4Division 9.4
- 9.5Division 9.5
- 9.6Division 9.6
- 9.7Division 9.7
- 9.8Division 9.8
- Indication of result
- 10.1Division 10.1
- 10.2Division 10.2
- 10.3Division 10.3
- 10.4Division 10.4
- 10.5Division 10.5
- Further processing of data to conclude the trading transaction
- 11.1A measuring instrument other than a utility measuring instrument shall record by a durable means the measurement result accompanied by information to identify the particular transaction, when:
- 11.2Division 11.2
- 12Conformity evaluation
- Annex II
- INTERNAL PRODUCTION CONTROL
- 1Division 1
- 2Technical documentation
- 3Manufacturing
- Conformity marking and EU declaration of conformity
- 4.1Division 4.1
- 4.2The manufacturer shall draw up a written EU declaration of conformity for an instrument model and keep it together with the technical documentation at the disposal of the national authorities for 10 years after the measuring instrument has been placed on the market. The EU declaration of conformity shall identify the instrument for which it was drawn up.
- 5Authorised representative
- Annex III
- WATER METERS (MI-001)
- DEFINITIONS
- SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
- Rated Operating Conditions
- MPE
- 5The MPE, positive or negative, on volumes delivered at flowrates between the transitional flowrate (Q2) (included) and the overload flowrate (Q4) is:
- 6The MPE, positive or negative, on volumes delivered at flowrates between the minimum flowrate (Q1) and the transitional flowrate (Q2) (excluded) is 5 % for water having any temperature.
- Permissible Effect of Disturbances
- Electromagnetic immunity
- 7.1.1The effect of an electromagnetic disturbance on a water meter shall be such that:
- 7.1.2After undergoing an electromagnetic disturbance the water meter shall:
- 7.1.3The critical change value is the smaller of the two following values:
- 7.2Durability
- Suitability
- 8.1Division 8.1
- 8.2The manufacturer shall specify whether the meter is designed to measure reverse flow. In such a case, the reverse flow volume shall either be subtracted from the cumulated volume or shall be separately recorded. The same MPE shall apply to both forward and reverse flow.
- Units of Measurement
- 9Division 9
- Putting into Use
- 10Division 10
- CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT
- Annex IV
- GAS METERS AND VOLUME CONVERSION DEVICES (MI-002)
- DEFINITIONS
- Part I: SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
- 1Rated operating conditions
- 1.1Division 1.1
- 1.2Division 1.2
- 1.3The fuel/gas related conditions
- 1.4Division 1.4
- 1.5Division 1.5
- Maximum permissible error (MPEs)
- 2.1Gas meter indicating the volume at metering conditions or mass
- 2.2Division 2.2
- Permissible effect of disturbances
- Electromagnetic immunity
- 3.1.1The effect of an electromagnetic disturbance on a gas meter or volume conversion device shall be such that:
- 3.1.2After undergoing a disturbance, the gas meter shall:
- 3.1.3The critical change value is the smaller of the two following values:
- 3.2Effect of upstream-downstream flow disturbances
- 4Durability
- Class 1,5 meters
- 4.1.1Division 4.1.1
- 4.1.2Division 4.1.2
- Class 1,0 meters
- 4.2.1Division 4.2.1
- 4.2.2Division 4.2.2
- Suitability
- 5.1Division 5.1
- 5.2Division 5.2
- 5.3Division 5.3
- 5.4Division 5.4
- 5.5Division 5.5
- 5.6Division 5.6
- 6Units
- IISPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
- 7Base conditions for converted quantities
- 8MPE
- Note:
- Division
- Division
- Suitability
- 9.1Division 9.1
- 9.2Division 9.2
- Part III: PUTTING INTO USE AND CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT
- Putting into use
- 10Division 10
- CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT
- Annex V
- ACTIVE ELECTRICAL ENERGY METERS (MI-003)
- Note:
- DEFINITIONS
- SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
- 1Accuracy
- 2Rated operating conditions
- 3MPEs
- Permissible effect of disturbances
- 4.1General
- 4.2Effect of disturbances of long duration
- Permissible effect of transient electromagnetic phenomena
- 4.3.1The effect of an electromagnetic disturbance on an electrical energy meter shall be such that during and immediately after a disturbance:
- 4.3.2Division 4.3.2
- Suitability
- 5.1Division 5.1
- 5.2Division 5.2
- 5.3Division 5.3
- 5.4Running with no load
- 5.5Starting
- 6Units
- Putting into use
- (a)Division (a)
- (b)Division (b)
- (c)Division (c)
- CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT
- Annex VI
- THERMAL ENERGY METERS (MI-004)
- DEFINITIONS
- SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
- 1Rated operating conditions
- 2Accuracy classes
- 3MPEs applicable to complete thermal energy meters
- Permissible influences of electromagnetic disturbances
- 4.1Division 4.1
- 4.2Division 4.2
- 4.3Division 4.3
- 5Durability
- 6Inscriptions on a thermal energy meter
- 7Sub-assemblies
- 7.1Division 7.1
- 7.2Division 7.2
- 7.3Division 7.3
- 7.4Division 7.4
- 7.5Inscriptions on the sub-assemblies
- PUTTING INTO USE
- 8Division 8
- CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT
- Annex VII
- MEASURING SYSTEMS FOR THE CONTINUOUS AND DYNAMIC MEASUREMENT OF QUANTITIES OF LIQUIDS OTHER THAN WATER (MI-005)
- DEFINITIONS
- SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
- 1Rated operating conditions
- 1.1The flowrate range
- 1.2Division 1.2
- 1.3Division 1.3
- 1.4Division 1.4
- Note:
- Accuracy classification and maximum permissible errors (MPEs)
- 2.1Division 2.1
- 2.2Division 2.2
- 2.3Division 2.3
- 2.4.1Division 2.4.1
- 2.4.2Division 2.4.2
- 2.5Converted indication
- 2.6Conversion devices
- (a)Calculator
- (b)Associated measuring instruments
- (c)Accuracy for calculating function
- 2.7Division 2.7
- 2.8Division 2.8
- Maximum permissible effect of disturbances
- 3.1The effect of an electromagnetic disturbance on a measuring system shall be one of the following:
- 3.2Division 3.2
- 4Durability
- Suitability
- 5.1Division 5.1
- 5.2Division 5.2
- 5.3Division 5.3
- Instruments for direct sales
- 5.4.1Division 5.4.1
- 5.4.2Division 5.4.2
- 5.4.3Division 5.4.3
- 5.4.4Division 5.4.4
- Fuel Dispensers
- 5.5.1Division 5.5.1
- 5.5.2Division 5.5.2
- 5.5.3Division 5.5.3
- 6Power supply failure
- 7Putting into use
- 8Units of measurement
- CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT
- Annex VIII
- AUTOMATIC WEIGHING INSTRUMENTS (MI-006)
- DEFINITIONS
- SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
- Requirements common to all types of automatic weighing instruments
- 1Rated Operating Conditions
- 2Permissible effect of disturbances — Electromagnetic environment
- Suitability
- 3.1Division 3.1
- 3.2Division 3.2
- 3.3Division 3.3
- 3.4Division 3.4
- 3.5Division 3.5
- 3.6Division 3.6
- 4Conformity assessment
- Automatic Catchweighers
- Accuracy Classes
- 1.1Instruments are divided into primary categories designated by:
- 1.2These primary categories are further divided into four accuracy classes:
- Category X Instruments
- 2.1Division 2.1
- 2.2The accuracy classes are supplemented by a factor (x) that quantifies the maximum permissible standard deviation as specified in point 4.2.
- 3Category Y Instruments
- MPE
- 4.1Mean error Category X/MPE Category Y instruments
- 4.2Standard deviation
- 4.3Verification scale interval — single interval instruments
- 4.4Verification scale interval — multi-interval instruments
- 5Measurement Range
- Dynamic Setting
- 6.1Division 6.1
- 6.2Division 6.2
- Performance Under Influence Factors And Electromagnetic Disturbances
- 7.1Division 7.1
- 7.1.1Division 7.1.1
- 7.1.2For category Y instruments
- 7.2Division 7.2
- 7.3Division 7.3
- Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instruments
- Accuracy classes
- 1.1Division 1.1
- 1.2Division 1.2
- 1.3Division 1.3
- 1.4Division 1.4
- MPE
- Static weighing error
- 2.1.1Division 2.1.1
- 2.1.2Division 2.1.2
- 2.2Deviation from average fill
- Note:
- 2.3Error relative to pre-set value (setting error)
- Performance Under Influence Factor And Electromagnetic Disturbance
- 3.1Division 3.1
- 3.2Division 3.2
- 3.3Division 3.3
- Discontinuous Totalisers
- 1Accuracy Classes
- 2MPEs
- 3Totalisation scale interval
- 4Minimum Totalised Load (Σmin)
- 5Zero Setting
- 6Operator Interface
- 7Printout
- Performance under influence factors and electromagnetic disturbances
- 8.1The MPEs due to influence factors shall be as specified in Table 7.
- 8.2Division 8.2
- Continuous Totalisers
- 1Accuracy classes
- Measurement Range
- 2.1Division 2.1
- 2.2The minimum totalised load Σmin shall not be less than
- 3MPE
- 4Speed of the belt
- 5General Totalisation Device
- Performance under influence factors and electromagnetic disturbances
- 6.1Division 6.1
- 6.2Division 6.2
- Automatic Rail Weighbridges
- 1Accuracy classes
- MPE
- 2.1The MPEs for weighing-in-motion of a single wagon or a total train are shown in Table 9.
- 2.2The MPEs for the weight of coupled or uncoupled wagons weighing-in-motion shall be one of the following values, whichever is the greatest:
- 2.3The MPEs for the weight of train weighing-in-motion shall be one of the following values, whichever is the greatest:
- 2.4Division 2.4
- 3Scale interval (d)
- Measurement range
- 4.1Division 4.1
- 4.2Division 4.2
- Performance under influence factor and electromagnetic disturbance
- 5.1The MPE due to an influence factor shall be as specified in Table 11.
- 5.2Division 5.2
- Annex IX
- TAXIMETERS (MI-007)
- DEFINITIONS
- Taximeter
- Fare
- Cross-over speed
- Normal calculation mode S (single application of tariff)
- Normal calculation mode D (double application of tariff)
- Operating position
- DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
- 1Division 1
- 2Division 2
- 3Division 3
- 4A taximeter shall be able to supply the following data through an appropriate secured interface(s):
- 5Division 5
- RATED OPERATING CONDITIONS
- 6.1Division 6.1
- 6.2The manufacturer shall specify the rated operating conditions for the instrument, in particular:
- MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE ERRORS (MPEs)
- 7The MPE, excluding any errors due to application of the taximeter in a taxi, are:
- PERMISSIBLE EFFECT OF DISTURBANCES
- Electromagnetic immunity
- 8.1Division 8.1
- 8.2Division 8.2
- POWER SUPPLY FAILURE
- 9In case of a reduction of the voltage supply to a value below the lower operating limit as specified by the manufacturer, the taximeter shall:
- OTHER REQUIREMENTS
- 10Division 10
- 11Division 11
- 12Division 12
- 13Division 13
- 14.1Division 14.1
- 14.2Division 14.2
- 14.3Division 14.3
- 15.1A taximeter shall be fitted with non-resettable totalisers for all of the following values:
- 15.2Division 15.2
- 15.3Division 15.3
- 16Automatic change of tariffs is allowed due to the:
- 17Division 17
- 18Division 18
- 19Division 19
- 20Division 20
- 21Division 21
- 22The taximeter shall be equipped with a real-timeclock by means of which the time of the day and the date are kept, one or both can be used for automatic change of tariffs. The requirements for the real-time clock are:
- 23The values of distance travelled and time elapsed, when displayed or printed in accordance with this Directive, shall use the following units:
- CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT
- Annex X: MATERIAL MEASURES (MI-008)
- CHAPTER IMaterial measures of length
- DEFINITIONS
- SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
- Reference Conditions
- 1.1Division 1.1
- 1.2Division 1.2
- MPEs
- 2The MPE, positive or negative in mm, between two non-consecutive scale marks is (a + bL), where:
- Materials
- 3.1Division 3.1
- 3.2Division 3.2
- Markings
- 4Division 4
- CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT
- CHAPTER IICapacity serving measures
- DEFINITIONS
- SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
- Reference Conditions
- 1.1Division 1.1
- 1.2Division 1.2
- 2MPEs
- 3Materials
- Shape
- 4.1Division 4.1
- 4.2Division 4.2
- Marking
- 5.1Division 5.1
- 5.2Division 5.2
- 5.3Division 5.3
- CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT
- Annex XI
- DIMENSIONAL MEASURING INSTRUMENTS (MI-009)
- DEFINITIONS
- Chapter I: Requirements common to all dimensional measuring instruments
- Electromagnetic immunity
- 1The effect of an electromagnetic disturbance on a dimensional measuring instrument shall be such that:
- 2Division 2
- CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT
- Chapter II: Length measuring instruments
- Characteristics of the product to be measured
- 1Textiles are characterised by the characteristic factor K. This factor takes the stretchability and force per unit area of the product measured into account and is defined by the following formula:
- Operating conditions
- 2.1Range
- 2.2Division 2.2
- 2.3Division 2.3
- MPEs
- 3Instrument
- Other requirements
- 4Division 4
- Chapter III: Area measuring instruments
- Operating conditions
- 1.1Range
- 1.2Condition of the product
- MPEs
- 2Instrument
- Other requirements
- 3Presentation of the product
- 4Scale interval
- Chapter IV: Multidimensional measuring instruments
- Operating conditions
- 1.1Range
- 1.2Minimum dimension
- 1.3Speed of the product
- MPE
- 2Instrument:
- Annex XII
- EXHAUST GAS ANALYSERS (MI-010)
- DEFINITIONS
- SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
- Instrument Classes
- 1Two classes (0 and I) are being defined for exhaust gas analysers. The relevant minimum measuring ranges for these classes are shown in Table 1.
- Rated operating conditions
- 2The values of the operating conditions shall be specified by the manufacturer as follows:
- Maximum permissible errors (MPEs)
- 3The MPEs are defined as follows:
- Permissible effect of disturbances
- 4Division 4
- 5The effect of an electromagnetic disturbance shall be such that:
- Other requirements
- 6The resolution shall be equal to or of one order of magnitude higher than the values shown in Table 3.
- 7Division 7
- 8Division 8
- 9The components in the exhaust gas, other than the components whose values are subject to the measurement, shall not affect the measurement results by more than the half of the modulus of the MPEs when those components are present in the following maximum volume fractions:
- 10Division 10
- 11Division 11
- 12Division 12
- 13Division 13
- 14Division 14
- CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT
- Annex XIII: EU DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY (No XXXX)
- 1Division 1
- 2Division 2
- 3Division 3
- 4Division 4
- 5Division 5
- 6Division 6
- 7Division 7
- 8Additional information:
- Annex XIV
- APart A
- BPart B
- Annex XVAnnex XV